学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

この文で赤い下線のmakeとhasが共通関係となっていると書かれているのですが、andで繋がってなくても良いのですか?

with 名詞・名構文の 仮定法の 表現の把握 なの 文 人文の 比較表現の把握 78 比較級/〈as + 原級〉は「比べる相手」をチェック 次の英文の下線部を訳しなさい 合 The saying “Early to bed and early to rise, makes a man healthy, wealthy, and wise," which has been attributed to Benjamin Franklin, American statesman and all-around genius, has greatly strengthened the superstitious belief that sleep is more restful before midnight. 解 (-two biw) aldinog mood ad Jon bloow du (千葉大) 比較級や〈as ~〉を見ると,機械的に「より~」 「同じくらい〜」などと訳 法 してしまいがちですが、後ろに比較する相手がないと,訳としてピンとこない ものです。これは,〈比較級 + (than ~ )〉や〈as + 原級 + (as ~)〉において( ) 内が省略されるケースでも、何と比べているのかを文脈からとらえることが,英文の 構造を理解するためのポイントになるからです。 例題は長い1つの文ですが,まずこの文のSとVを確定してみましょう。 ことわざ(という) 早寝すること ~・・・にする 人(を) healthy, The saying "Early (to bed) makes a man c① S (副) S① (不) (Vi) Vt O かつ 早起きすることは and (等) early (to rise), (副) S② (不) (Vi かつ wealthy, c② and wise," c③ (等) ここで, The saying (ことわざ)に対して“ とがわかります。 の中身が同格関係を作っているこ 内の節がそのことわざです。 「早寝早起き」で1つの概念とと りますから、3単現 makes が使われています。 この後の which は関係代名詞の継続 saying で V は genius の後の has strengthened だとキャッチできますね。 用法で, そこからgenius までが挿入節になっています。 とすれば,文のSは The ~ 例題: 語句 saying ことわざ/ wealthy 形豊かな/ be attributed to N 「Nの作と思わ 「れている」 / statesman 图 政治家/ genius 天才/ superstitious 形 迷信的な/ ned 大いにを強くしてしょうに 通信的な 信念 has greatly strengthened the superstitious belief (副) という Vt (現完) 睡眠 もっと 休息を与える [that sleep is more restful omob a lon (同格節)→(接) 以前に S Vi (比) rolgirl on od yam C it = sleep 真夜中よりも以後 真夜中 (before midnight) [than it is (after midnight)]]. (省略) この課のポイントは同格のthat節 (→47課) 内の more restful という比較級の部 分のとらえ方です。 more と呼応する than ~が省略されています。 とすれば, than に続く 「比べる相手」 を文脈からキャッチしなければなりませんね。 節内の主語は sleep ですが, than の後に主語を置くと,こちらも sleep と考えられ るので、同一物(人) に関する状態の比較になります。つまり「睡眠はほかの何かより restful」というのではなく、 「睡眠は真夜中前のほうが〜よりもrestful」とすると, 真夜中前 (before midnight) と比較されるのは after midnight と見当がつきますね。 than の後に it (= sleep) is after midnight を補うと形が整います。 〈全文訳〉 「早寝早起きは人を健康にし、豊かにし、かつ賢明にする」というこ とわざは、アメリカの政治家であり、かつ多才な天才であったベンジャミン・ フランクリンの作と言われているが,睡眠は真夜中前のほうが休息がとれると いう迷信を大いに強固にしてしまっている。 演習 78 次の英文の下線部を訳しなさい。- (解説・解答 別冊: p.47) Like many native Italians, my parents were very open with their feelings and their love | would never hug their fathers. I guess they were afraid of not appearing | strong and independent. But I hugged and kissed my dad at every not only at home, but also in public. Most of my friends opportunity ~nothing could have felt more natural. (産能短大) 語句 native 形生粋の/hug Vt を抱きしめる / independent 自立した/ opportunity 与える

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

以前画像3枚目の様に修飾限定予告のthatというものを習ったので今回もその形なのかと思い、それらのと入れずに訳してしまったのですがこのthoseの識別は文脈判断ということでしょうか? 教えて頂きたいです。よろしくお願いいたします。

実理 K The starting point for today's *meritocracy, of course, is the idea that intelligence exists and can be measured, like weight or strength or fluency in French. The most obvious difference between intelligence and these other traits is that all the others are presumably changeable. If someone weighs too much, he can go on a その人 →Heyで受けるのが一般的 5 diet; if he's weak, he can lift weights; if he wants to learn French, he can take a course. But in principle he can't change his intelligence. There is another important difference 原則として MV between intelligence and other traits. Height and weight and speed and strength and サフィス体例 関係性が強い文がくる even conversational fluency are real things; there's no doubt about what's being 間違いなん measured. Intelligence is a much murkier concept. Some people are generally (2) m2 Vogue 10 smarter than others, and some are obviously talented in specific ways; they're chess 天才 S masters, math *prodigies. But can the factors that make one person seem quicker than another be measured precisely, like height and weight? Can we confidently say that one person is 10 percent smarter than another, in the same way we can say he's 10 へんて、いつだっ S percent faster in the hundred-yard dash? And can we be confident that two thirds of 櫂へん 言いかえ 15 all people have IQs within one standard deviation of the norm that is, between 90 ように and 110 - - as we can be sure that two thirds of all people have heights within one standard deviation of the norm for height? Yes, they can, and yes, we can. besure least, are the answers that the IQ part of the meritocracy rests on. Those, at (3)-

解決済み 回答数: 2
英語 高校生

なぜ、suggesting になるのかがわかりません💦

英語 About seven years ago I started learning how to paint as a hobby: I was pretty terrible. Everything looked flat, I did not have the right proportions, and my colors were totally off. My friends and colleagues suggested that I stop wasting my time (a ) something I wasn't good at. "Focus on your day job," they said. I kept at it practicing, taking classes, finding the right teachers who could teach and challenge me Over five years, painting started to become intuitive", and surprisingly, I am now considered "good." Today, the same friends say I was born with this talent. "You're in the wrong profession," one said recently. The same thing happened when I started piano and singing lessons a couple of years ago. Comments shifted from. "Stop wasting your time and focus on what you know," to "You've got a musical talent." (A These comments originate from long-held beliefs that growth is largely not possible for adults. Even when there is evidence of learning, it can be caused by talent from birth, like the comments that I received suggested. Most scientific studies on adulthood focus on cognitive maintenance or decline, rather than growth. (b) that even scientists may think that development is severely limited in adulthood. The prevailing" mentality is represented by proverbs, such as "use it or lose it," or worse, "old dogs can't learn new tricks." A few recent studies, such as ones by Arne May and Denise Park, ( C ) suggest that learning new skills, such as juggling or photography, for even three months may strengthen brain functioning in adults. (B) I would take these studies one step further to argue that an important cause of cognitive

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 中学生

合ってるか不安です💦 答えがないので答え合わせがしたいです🙇‍♀️ よろしくお願いします

次のメグ (Meg) とおば (Aunt) の対話文を読んで、後の問いに答えなさい。 Aunt : Meg : I want to be a nurse. ? Aunt : Why? Meg Aunt : Because I want to help sick people. But I have another reason, : 'What is it? Meg the next : Look.enty yea Aunt Meg : Aunt to this article, AI will take many jobs away. It says many jobs will disappear in years. However, it also says medical jobs will not disappear. sca I think so, too. AI help nurses a lot and it plays an important role in hospitals. But I think Al can not read patients' feelings well. When nurses take care of patients, it is important to understand their ② You like communicating with people, so ③ it can be your strength as a nurse. I think you'll be a good nurse. Thank you. I'll study hard to be a good nurse like you. : I wish we will work together someday. 注) medical 医療の patient 患者 take care of 〜の世話をする。 (1)下線部①にはメグへの質問の文が入ります。 ふさわしい1文を考え、英語で書きなさい。 What do you want. to be (2) 下線部②に最も適する1語を、下の選択肢から選び、記号を書きなさい。 ア. meanings イ. jobs ウ. patients H feelings (3) 下線部③のitは具体的にどのようなことを指していますか。 日本語で書きなさい。 コミュニケーションをとること (4)本文に関する次の質問の答えとして最も適するものをア~エから選び、その記号を書きなさい。 Question : Why does Meg's aunt think that medical jobs will not disappear ? ア. Because Al always help nurses a lot and it plays an important role. イ. Because it's necessary for nurses to work with Al in hospitals. ウ Because the article says medical jobs will not disappear. H Because it's not easy for Al to read patients' feelings. (5) 本文に関する次の質問に、それぞれ3語以上の英語で答えなさい。(語数に、ピリオド等の符号は含めませ ん) ① Yes,it does ① Does the article say that many jobs will disappear in next twenty years? ② What will Meg do to be a good nurse like her aunt? ② shell study hard.

解決済み 回答数: 2
1/8