Grade

Subject

Type of questions

English Senior High

英語わかる方教えてください😭

[3]次の英文を読み, 各問いに答えなさい。 [思•判・表] (教科書 P.131~133 参照) Going Abroad We are told that going abroad can help us learn English and learn about other cultures, but there is a much more important reason to travel overseas. it helps us grow. First, - we learn to understand other people more. Foreigners are seen as people who are different from us, but if we become a foreigner, we must adapt to the social norms of another culture. Baseball legend Ichiro Suzuki said, [3] (5点x3) (1) @ (3) “Becoming a foreigner has taught me to be considerate and compassionate. These feelings only come through experience." Second, we are challenged with a variety of situations overseas. In facing these, we can find our true nature. Michelle Crichton, author of Jurassic Park, said, “Often I feel I go to some distant region of the world to be reminded of who I really am." ( ① ) whether you take a trip, study abroad, work abroad, or even perhaps marry someone in another country, take ②the challenge of becoming a foreigner. It may change your life. ' (1)筆者が鈴木イチロー選手の言葉を引用しているのは,以下のどの根拠を補強して説明するためですか。 ふさわしいものを選択肢から選び、記号で答えなさい。 ア. 海外へ行くことで,最新のスポーツや映画を楽しむことができる イ. 海外へ行くことで,さまざまな状況で試され成長できる ウ.海外へ行くことで,他者をもっと理解するようになる (2) ( 1 )に当てはまる語を選択肢から選び, 解答欄に書きなさい。 [ However / But / So / For example ] (3)下線部②「外国人になってみること」というのは具体的にどういうことですか。 下記のうち、本文中で述べられていない ものを1つ選び、記号で答えなさい。 ア. 海外で働くこと エ. 人生を変えること イ. 国際結婚をすること オ. 海外旅行に行くこと ウ. 海外留学をすること

Resolved Answers: 1
English Senior High

問4の⑤の計算はどうすれば合うのですか。 教えてください🙇‍♀️ 3枚目が答えです。

次の英文を読んで,下の設問に答えなさい。 Last year, 4.2 million babies died. That is the most recent number reported by UNICEF of deaths before the age of one, worldwide. We often see lonely and emotionally charged numbers like this in the news or in the materials of activist groups or organizations. They produce a reaction. Who can even imagine 4.2 million dead babies? It is so terrible, and even worse when we know that almost all died from easily preventable diseases. And how can anyone argue that 4.2 million is anything other than a huge number? You might think that nobody would even try to argue (that, but you would be wrong. That is exactly why I mentioned this number. Because it is not huge: it is beautifully small. If we even start to think about how tragic each of these deaths is for the parents who had waited for their newborn to smile, and walk, and play, and instead had to bury their baby, then this number could keep us crying for a long time. But who would be helped by these tears? Instead let's think clearly about human suffering. The number 4.2 million is for 2016. The year before, the number was 4.4 million. The year before that, it was 4.5 million. Back in 1950, it was 14.4 million. That's almost 10 million more dead babies per year, compared with today. Suddenly this terrible number starts to look smaller. In fact (2)the number has never been lower. Of course, I am the first person to wish the number was even lower and falling even faster. But to know how to act, and how to prioritize resources, nothing can be more important than doing the cool-headed math and realizing what works and what doesn't. And this is clear: more and more deaths are being prevented. comparing the numbers. (3). We would never realize that without

Resolved Answers: 1
Chemistry Senior High

解説にある③の質量パーセント濃度とモル濃度が異なるというのはどこで分かるのかと、浸透圧が大きいと溶媒が葉腋中に侵入しようとする現象を抑える力が大きくなるのに袋が膨らみやすいというのはどういうことですか?

問5 図1のように, 液体Aを半透膜の袋に入れ, 液体Bが入ったビーカーに入れ てしばらく放置した。 これに関する記述として誤りを含むものはどれか。 最も 適当なものを,後の①~④のうちから一つ選べ。 ただし, 半透膜は水は通すが, 溶質粒子は通さないものとする。 5 液体A は 半透膜 の袋 液体 B CHIM 図1 液体Aを半透膜の袋に入れ、液体Bに浸した装置 紅 HM HOR Aにデンプン水溶液, Bに水を用いると, 袋は膨らむ。 ②A に 0.10mol/Lのスクロース (ショ糖) 水溶液, B に 0.20mol/Lのスク ロース水溶液を用いると, 袋はしぼむ。 +す。 Bの方が濃度が大きいからAから水が移動 →袋はしぼむ ④ Aに質量パーセント濃度が2% のスクロース水溶液, Bに質量パーセン ト濃度が2% のグルコース水溶液 (ブドウ糖) を用いると, 袋の大きさは変 化しない。 A に 0.10mol/Lのスクロース水溶液, Bに水を用いて 40℃にした場合と ④A 0.10mol/Lのスクロース水溶液,Bに水を用いて40 20℃にした場合では、 A を40℃にした場合の方が20℃にした場合より袋 は膨らみやすい。

Resolved Answers: 1
English Senior High

赤い下線のところがどういう構造になっているか分からないです、教えてくださいm(_ _)m

moving from " (1) 点) There are historians and others who would like to make a neat division between "historical facts" and "values." The trouble is that values even enter into deciding what count as facts-there is a big leap involved in 'raw data" to a judgement of fact. More important, one finds that the more complex and multi-levelled the history is, and the more important the issues it raises for today, the less it is possible to sustain a fact-value division. But this by no means implies that there has simply to be a conflict of prejudices and biases, as the data are manipulated to suit one worldview or another. What it does mean is that the self of the historian is an important factor. The historian is shaped by experiences, contexts, norms, values, and beliefs. When dealing with history, especially the sort of history that is of most significance in philosophy, that shaping is bound to be relevant. As far as possible it needs to be articulated and open to discussion. The best historians are well aware of this. They are alert to many dimensions of bias and to the endless (and therefore endlessly discussable) significance of their own horizons and presuppositions. A great deal can of course be learned from those who do not share our presuppositions. Our capacity to make wise, well-supported judgements in matters of historical fact and significance can only be formed over years of discussion with others, many of whom have very different horizons from our own. It is possible to I have a 12-year-old chess champion or mathematical or musical genius, but it is unimaginable that the world's greatest expert on Socrates could be that age. The difficulty is not just one of the time to assimilate information; it is (2)

Resolved Answers: 1