こういう英文の間違い訂正の問題全く出来ないんですけどどうすれば良いでしょうか コツとかありますか

下の文あるいは下線部には誤りが1 つある。 指摘して」 末 は下線部に妥りがなければ⑤NO ERROR を選びなさい、 しなさい。 また設問573にっいて 568 9 preeent yeareyeductors have become ne 時間 10分ち1較2 methods V "HHh language teachine @ Returning to her room, she onn| 1 @ The cost ofliving has raised three Concerned the low air fares. wo 還 %a 出結 ) (大 9 In the discussion.6ne speaKeト 。 Posed that (Simee we ive im 。 ao 蘭記sitea widh(4 Caverage individval) seidom cares abowe 5 証 amyones else fnancial problems。 クノリー ーー NR 6 5⑳ - Mkr_eeoyのの ) 人 年Sendai.bound passenger train derailed on September 4 。 和 Fukushin fure。 killing over 20 people and 。 being seriously injured 70. ke oy Du/ ) (国土結 le ⑳⑲ 人 kindly wrote me Cact said athat he understood 。 what was doin ) (名古屋外国語2 ー 者t の de ぉmy car to the た 937 raining 。 very hard. し の - Joe ) (了 8 eb 中eofthe most briliant people T have ever 。 run into especia mes to 。 be able to diseuss world affairs るNO ERROR ④ ルン bewy し ) (時竹田 Seience program reflects 。 a broad range of studies @by offerin, mber of courses that o covers major areas. 002 ) (学習 fefihters 。 using a three-meters sh the fire. 1adder to 。 get onto the roof ) (中 、 mterviews, diaries or any od eanalyzed and evaluated. ビッ ) (中喝 D by means of guestionnaires ery hittle 。 so far as they

電子式の作り方教えてください。🙇🏻‍♀️

本 HG| 次の物質の電子式を記せ。また, 共有電子対と非共有電子対が何組あるかを それぞれ記せ。 (0) 塩素Cl (⑫) 水 HO (3) シアン化水素 HCN (4) 通酸化水素 HO。

訳してください！ While a survey reported in 2001 that 71% of Europeans felt that everyone in the European Union (EU) should be able to speak o... Read More

丸は気にしないでください(><) 答え教えていただけると嬉しいです😭

間 JH OUT culture, where the use ot dictionaries 1S WideSDread。many people may have the impression that a word's meaning is simply its dictionary definition.A little thought should show however, that there must be more to meaning than this. It is true that when someone wants to find out what き Word means, an easy and practical way to do it is to look the word up ina dicionary. Most people in our caltare accept dictionaries as providing unauestionably authoritative accounts of the meanings of the words they define. [2] Thenoleof dictionaries/ in our society as authorities on meaning 1eads many people to feel that the dicionary dehnition of a word more accurately represents the word's meaning than does an individual speaker's nderstanding of the word. Keep in mind/ however。 that the people who write dictionaries arrive at their definitions by studying the ways speakers of the language use different words. Some dictionaries are relatively prescriptive\、 others more descriptive* but all must face the fact that a word means what people use it to mean。 There simply is no higher authority than the general community of native speakers of the language. This is obyiously the position one must take in descriptive analysis、 but even in prescriptive grammar, words cannot be given strange defimitions that dont correspond to actual uses of those words by the speech community. A word's meaning is determined by the people who use that word, not by a dictionary- [3] The iqea that a dictionary definition is all there is to a word's meaning runs into even more serious problems when one considers that im order to understand the dictionary definition of a word, one must know the meanings of the words used in that definition: For example. 下 the word ecfo7xere is defined as 'a blastomere that develops into ectoderm'、one must ee he 0 Me 0 Pd Side

2問教えてください😭

[4」 。 Ta word's meammng is its dictionary definition, then understanding this meaning involves understanding the meanings of the words used in the definitions. But understanding the meanings of these words must involve understanding the meanings of the words in 妨e7 definitions. And understanding 7ese definitions must involve understanding the words they use, which of course would have to involvye understanding even more definitions. The process is never-ending. [5] Sometimes the circularity* of a set of dictionary definitions is apparent by looking up just a few words. For instance, one English dictionary defines gzozze as being or having the nature of a deity*、 but defines gez/y as "divinity*. Another defines przde as the quality or state of being proud', but defines proxd as *feeling or showing pride'、Examples hke these are especially graphic\。but essentially the same problem holds for any dictionary-style definition. Dictionaries are written to be of practical aid to people who already speak the language, not to make theoretical claims about the nature of meaning. People can and do learn the meanings of some words through dictionary definitions, so Would be unfair to say that such definitions are completely unable to characterize the meanings of words, but it should be clear that dictionary definitions cant be all there is to the meanings of all the words in a language.

英語です。教えてください。助けてください。

2009 Crown Pance and de on My 』 took UNe hrone Naruhito(C new cm "Reiwa" wared. "Rewar mesns。 People bring their hears togelhcr to build cal Thc em mame ystem began in anciemt Chima。 jr showed a mk dominancc er a ceraim pedod。 Japans firt em Tika(A人も) jkbcgan in 645 eore tmc Meii cm, cm names changd fien。 Toy changed afer happy went bad ent jike cerhgakes。 Retwa is te 2480h era mam Im Rewa thee will bc big evene jike the Tokyo Olympics amd tme Ok Exposiion。 4What event ame you looking forward oin Rewg Srwearamee own) Ma -os電 [yr 4dWe we Tee oymete eowke Rxpown 平り始まったころの日本 Ne%は守。 | sam Re人EDが <OGプMO提了でした mo凶 委 pr memo- 計 ーー 凍EsHHSH 人 Woを人を6をきい wget還きすか to Wesem Weep でar rp We wwre dy nodeber ottWWwChe spore dey し2 KWの*のっいたのをきたして、()。のをにしをきい、 (のGE( )A還をかえて章くこと What emr are you ooking rard toin Reiean| ⑪ 》なはつうNEます6 (eewaly 7tme 7go ebed 7dm/wiae/yom79 9 WW人のを和しますを

to beはどうしてここに入るのでしょうか？

@ yourself

何番になりますか？お願いします！

英 語 (2 一12) (寺生 | | - | ) 第1間 炎の英壇を読み あとの問い (問1 12) に答えなさい。なお[1] 一 16 は段落を示しています。 *印の語 (名) には注がついています。 (解答番号 は1一 12 |) UMの ontribute to the *diversity ) js lost when ]anguages (and cultures) then becomes important to understand what can and is bei protect fhe world's anguages. Yet, 中」 once we have recognized how languages CI of our world and (| disappear mg done to ges, this simply is not Bossible. There are too many ]anguages with too few speakers and n ot enough time. Understanding this, there are generally two active approaches to Yendangered janguages. The 近rst js gz2ge peser7o7 and the second is gge 7e/7277zZ7O7。 [2] Language preservation often occurs when the ]anguage has bee reduced to Yery few jving speakers. Im this type of Work linguists to record as much information about the language and culture as i Dossible knowing that once these Temaining Speakers are gone th (5) Ianguage js dead. (| this kind of work jnguistic "salvage work 8 49m second it is sometimes calle

答えがないので1から4まででどれがあっているか教えて欲しいです。 ⚠私はあっていないと思います。

英 語 (2 一12) (角答番号 | 1 | - | se | ) 第 1 間。 次の共丈を読み。あとの思い (問1 12) に答えなきい。 なお,【[1】 一 [6 は自落を示しています。*印の語 (名) には注がついていますc (半生 AMWりの 仙回上層| 還記 ibute to the *diversity 中 」 Once we have recognized_how W languages contri of our world and ( 日 ) is lost when languages (and cultures) diSappear i then becomes important to understand what can and jS being done to protect the world's languages. Yet。 no matter how much we might want (3) to ビー all of the world's languages, this simply jS not possible. There d not enough tme. are too many languages with too few Speakers an active approaches to Understanding this, there are generally two endangered Ianguages。 The frst is Zngigge preservgfion and the second is /27g42ge 『7ey7Z77<77O77。 [2] Language preservation often occurs when the language has been reduced to Very few living speakers. In this type of work, “lmguists try itO record as much information about the language and culture as ijS

岩手大のいつかの過去問です。黄色でマーカーを引いたところの文構造と和訳を教えてほしいです。believed to beやandの使われ方が特に分かりません。 どなたか解説よろしくお願いします。

Have you hcard he welLknown claim hat onl-7 pereent ofany spoken messageia還の3 1 sherieiel us that a fuN 93 pefeent ef any message is communicared nonverbally/Tiis contcndon is 6f cours absGNute Rubbisi Thc 7-pcrccnt formula is endorscd by many professional communicaton traincrs They cell us that of hc 93 pcrcent figure refering to nonverbal Gommunicaton 53 pcrcenr is through body language and the Other 38 percent is through One GTNOice T anndcd acommunicatons workshop recendy in 《siicdh the faeiitorl uite 9 cy mphasizcd ythese seadsdcs/ wasy to put it indelicatey dumbfounded9 Tchallenged her by asking "Do you mcan that if stood jn front ofithis class and spoke yere consistent with my rp in Chinse,&s jong aymy body language and tone of rmessagey You would al understand me?9 She uecd all he communicadon Kils at her command to virtually slap me down. /She supported hcr claims by quoting the research done by the eminent psychology professor Albert Mehrabian。 The rest_of the class impresscd that this principle was being put fortn as the の7 resulr of a scientific study and not just as a myth or rumor。 nodded in agreement 1 acquiesced*。 remaining unconvinccd. 1 consulred my friend Google and did some research。 Yes。experiments were の7 conducted by Albert Mehrabian、 currcntly profcssor emeritus* of psychology at the Universiny of California at Los Angcles. But thc rcscarch in qucstion was done in 3 1967.using one word at a ime to measure [yhat thc hstcncr beliced to be the fcchng of he spcakerkndl determine iF the Istener hiked the spcaker The cxperiment was never intended to measurelhow well the jkteners understood what the spcaker was nying Q communicate. Achrabian has published his work and findimgs in thc book Sicr AMesge。(On gz his website、 Mchrabian states: “SAgr Afessgges contains a detailed discussion of my indings on inconsistent messages QP feelings and atiitudes (and the relatve importance Tam ob beginning Unformnaele 39