数学の空間ベクトルについての問題です。 写真の黄色いマーカーが引いてある問題なんですけど、いまいち言っていることが分からなくて…これはどのように答えたらいいのでしょうか⁇ 答えがないので申し訳ないのですが、、どなたかわかる方ご回答いただけないでしょうか。よろしくお願いします。

ケトルを * とすれば ⑰の` < 呈寺fg (一の とれを直線 (0 のベク トル表示あるいは助 数(parameter), g を直線 (の の方向ペク トルと言 方向ベクットルはもちろん一意的に には定まらない・ もっあぁる) を取ると都合のよいととが多い。 -二 座標を使って表わしてみよう・ 了P。 の座標ベクトルを 本 -り ・9 6 とすれば, ターカーの一yy) したかって イニ ol セー ター NN 二京 PP。 を通る直線の方程式にほかならない: 縛 表示と一次方程式による表示とを相互に移し委到るご う後は 問題によって都合のよい表示を使う ととにまあ 問 1 つぎの方程式の: 計式の表わす直線の の19 0拓 2 ip) は コa

写真の部分の訳し方が分からないです💦

Part 1 IReading Comprehension I Choose the correcile for each_paragraph、 司り7 NSPウ|六 ヽ

下線部6の指す意味がわかりません教えてください😭🙇‍♀️🙇‍♀️

dt oorTow, atronger than 1 ④(be) today.! Tim the strongest。 This is ⑤(the phyase / his radkets / he / on7 pute ) After he won the singles title at the Beiing Paralympics in 2008, he many challenges、( ⑦ ),he believed that becoming a professional had an important meaning for him、 Fe SaVS: 7 ope oz dzsの7ed cん77ez ro277 0ecome iferesfed it のeelcoir ferris 77/ の/y 6672722S 0 o77y 7O の77。 6042 o7so 7o safe peop/e by のining-

私は将来、人を喜ばせることが出来る仕事をしたいです。の英文は、写真のであっていますか？

Write a paragraph about yourself.

あなたについての段落を書きなさいって意味ですか？

Write a paragraph about yourself.

・ independence の形容詞形 ・ prepare の形容詞形 ・responsibility の形容詞形 ・corporate の名詞形 この4つがわかりません 教えてください🙇‍♂️

空いてるところは枠の中のどれになるのでしょうか？ ちなみに空いてるのは、cell membraneとlysosomeです。

Rbosome Labelthe Plant Cell echondn Gola ん 内 fdzpkmiz FRcfculum Vocab Box: (12) Ribosome _ | GolgiApparatus Cell Membrane Nucleus Nucleolus Lcellwal Cytoplasm Lysosome Mitochondria Endoplasmic Reticulum | Amyloplast Vacuole =

非制限用法の先行詞を教えて下さい。 添付写真の赤線の赤線の非制限用法の先行詞しを教えて頂くことは出来ますか？ which つまり、人では無いので requests でしょうか？ よろしくお願いします。

Wedding Planning Made Easy TYNDALE (9 September)一Robert Marsh knows firsthand that plannine a weddins can be a Hme-consuming and enerey-draining endeavor. “My fiancee and 1 he explains、 “had tO crisscross Tyndale to find vendors that suited our budeet and style requirements. It Occurred tO me that there had to be a better way of making the neCceSSaTy Weddine DreDarations.“ 一一. Barely a year into his marriaee, he created Nuptials Paradise,a company that aims (O simplify wedding planning. Located at 248 Palmchat Drive. site of the former Harrison Grocery Store. the company has Dartnered with 50 weddins industry professionals. 一[2] 一. “Our Customers love the convenience Of beine able to book the services they need at one location.” says Mr. Marsh. “Vendors, in tuTn, have easier access {O a laree number of clients.” 一 [3] 一. Mr. Marsh says that he has received requests frOom VariOuS Deople interested in ODening their Own businesses under his brand name、 which would make them_ distributors of hiS services. Evidently, he is OpDen {O (hat DOssibility. “Just months after havins OpDened Nuptials Paradise.′ he Says、 “it became aDDarent tO me that there Was a gTeat need fOr my Sservices. 1 cannot be everywhere at Once、sO I certainly would welcome some help.” 一 [4] 一.

丸は気にしないでください(><) 答え教えていただけると嬉しいです😭

間 JH OUT culture, where the use ot dictionaries 1S WideSDread。many people may have the impression that a word's meaning is simply its dictionary definition.A little thought should show however, that there must be more to meaning than this. It is true that when someone wants to find out what き Word means, an easy and practical way to do it is to look the word up ina dicionary. Most people in our caltare accept dictionaries as providing unauestionably authoritative accounts of the meanings of the words they define. [2] Thenoleof dictionaries/ in our society as authorities on meaning 1eads many people to feel that the dicionary dehnition of a word more accurately represents the word's meaning than does an individual speaker's nderstanding of the word. Keep in mind/ however。 that the people who write dictionaries arrive at their definitions by studying the ways speakers of the language use different words. Some dictionaries are relatively prescriptive\、 others more descriptive* but all must face the fact that a word means what people use it to mean。 There simply is no higher authority than the general community of native speakers of the language. This is obyiously the position one must take in descriptive analysis、 but even in prescriptive grammar, words cannot be given strange defimitions that dont correspond to actual uses of those words by the speech community. A word's meaning is determined by the people who use that word, not by a dictionary- [3] The iqea that a dictionary definition is all there is to a word's meaning runs into even more serious problems when one considers that im order to understand the dictionary definition of a word, one must know the meanings of the words used in that definition: For example. 下 the word ecfo7xere is defined as 'a blastomere that develops into ectoderm'、one must ee he 0 Me 0 Pd Side

2問教えてください😭

[4」 。 Ta word's meammng is its dictionary definition, then understanding this meaning involves understanding the meanings of the words used in the definitions. But understanding the meanings of these words must involve understanding the meanings of the words in 妨e7 definitions. And understanding 7ese definitions must involve understanding the words they use, which of course would have to involvye understanding even more definitions. The process is never-ending. [5] Sometimes the circularity* of a set of dictionary definitions is apparent by looking up just a few words. For instance, one English dictionary defines gzozze as being or having the nature of a deity*、 but defines gez/y as "divinity*. Another defines przde as the quality or state of being proud', but defines proxd as *feeling or showing pride'、Examples hke these are especially graphic\。but essentially the same problem holds for any dictionary-style definition. Dictionaries are written to be of practical aid to people who already speak the language, not to make theoretical claims about the nature of meaning. People can and do learn the meanings of some words through dictionary definitions, so Would be unfair to say that such definitions are completely unable to characterize the meanings of words, but it should be clear that dictionary definitions cant be all there is to the meanings of all the words in a language.