文の構成のSVOCMなどがあっているか、また空白のところが何にあたるか分からないので教えていただけませんか？

) It has been said th P Peop gli nm S 1 3 at Ja anese Deo] 回 Sannet speak ER lish because they GS so shy, but this 5 not correct. Their English does not improve because they don't try to 86e、their 6pinions clearly. 4 ッ 絡42 2 の

It appears that the people of the “nuclear village ”were optimistic that they could find a solution to the problem of nuclear waste. この和訳... 続きを読む

１枚目が問題、2枚目は模範解答、３枚目は私の答えです。2と４が若干違うので、訂正などがあれば教えて下さい。

第2回 長文読解演習 ピー 次の文章を読んで、下の問いに答えなさい。 Universal design is a type of design that anVone can use. People of any age or abiity can use universal design products. And these products are all around us. For example, imagine the shampoo bottle that you use every day. There is a mark on the side of the bottdle. The mark means “shampoo'” or “rinse.” (un) helps blind people use the shampoo. At the samme time, it is useful for everyone because We can't open our eyes while we wash our harr. he “non-step” bus is another example of universal design. The low entrance of te bus is for the elderly and people in wheelchairs. It helps them get on the bus easilY. However。 wirh this design, it iS easier for CVeryOne tO get on the bus. It as designed for people wirh dsabiities。but it helps all people. he changing style of cellular phones is another example of universal design、 A tew years ago, (they became smaller and jighter. Then people began to send e-mails from her cellular phones,。 (2)SO he LCDs and buttons became larger and clearer. Now more people can use these functionS. Also, people who cannot hear well can communicate with e-mails. Can you fimd any other examples of universal design? ォ snampoo シャンプー」 rinse「リンス] help + 〇O+動詞の原形IO がするのに役立つ1 disab近ry 身体障害] cellular phone 「携帯電話] LCDI液晶ディ スプレー! tuncton !機態) communicafe with 一「一で連絡する」

2 の（ ）に当てはまる最も適切なものがどうしてもわかりません。 教えてください🙇‍♂️

Switzerland has been a neutral state since 1815. But how can their neutrality ( 1 ) themithereisa nuclear War in Europe? Surely the whole of Europe would be destroyed in a nuclear war. The Swiss are well prepared for that. Since 1960, every new building in Switzerland 5 must have a nuclear shelter by law. They are made of reinforced concrete, and have concrete doors 30 centimeters thick so that they can withstand anatomic ( 2 ). They must have a gas filter in case poisonous gas is used. There must also be enough space, for ,。Storing food and water supplies for three months. The cost of building the shelter is shared ) between the owner of the building and the Swiss government. Beneath every large office block and public building, there are car parks with massive blastproof concrete doors. These( 3 )carparks can be quickly aconverted into shelters for hundreds of people. They are fally( 4 ) mwithhospital beds, medicine, telephones, food and water. there is the danger of a nuclear war in Europe, the whole Swiss nation wil move quickly into these shelters. (182 主) (注) blastproof 爆風よけの

丸は気にしないでください(><) 答え教えていただけると嬉しいです😭

間 JH OUT culture, where the use ot dictionaries 1S WideSDread。many people may have the impression that a word's meaning is simply its dictionary definition.A little thought should show however, that there must be more to meaning than this. It is true that when someone wants to find out what き Word means, an easy and practical way to do it is to look the word up ina dicionary. Most people in our caltare accept dictionaries as providing unauestionably authoritative accounts of the meanings of the words they define. [2] Thenoleof dictionaries/ in our society as authorities on meaning 1eads many people to feel that the dicionary dehnition of a word more accurately represents the word's meaning than does an individual speaker's nderstanding of the word. Keep in mind/ however。 that the people who write dictionaries arrive at their definitions by studying the ways speakers of the language use different words. Some dictionaries are relatively prescriptive\、 others more descriptive* but all must face the fact that a word means what people use it to mean。 There simply is no higher authority than the general community of native speakers of the language. This is obyiously the position one must take in descriptive analysis、 but even in prescriptive grammar, words cannot be given strange defimitions that dont correspond to actual uses of those words by the speech community. A word's meaning is determined by the people who use that word, not by a dictionary- [3] The iqea that a dictionary definition is all there is to a word's meaning runs into even more serious problems when one considers that im order to understand the dictionary definition of a word, one must know the meanings of the words used in that definition: For example. 下 the word ecfo7xere is defined as 'a blastomere that develops into ectoderm'、one must ee he 0 Me 0 Pd Side

2問教えてください😭

[4」 。 Ta word's meammng is its dictionary definition, then understanding this meaning involves understanding the meanings of the words used in the definitions. But understanding the meanings of these words must involve understanding the meanings of the words in 妨e7 definitions. And understanding 7ese definitions must involve understanding the words they use, which of course would have to involvye understanding even more definitions. The process is never-ending. [5] Sometimes the circularity* of a set of dictionary definitions is apparent by looking up just a few words. For instance, one English dictionary defines gzozze as being or having the nature of a deity*、 but defines gez/y as "divinity*. Another defines przde as the quality or state of being proud', but defines proxd as *feeling or showing pride'、Examples hke these are especially graphic\。but essentially the same problem holds for any dictionary-style definition. Dictionaries are written to be of practical aid to people who already speak the language, not to make theoretical claims about the nature of meaning. People can and do learn the meanings of some words through dictionary definitions, so Would be unfair to say that such definitions are completely unable to characterize the meanings of words, but it should be clear that dictionary definitions cant be all there is to the meanings of all the words in a language.

なぜdifficultではなくhardなのか 詳しく教えてください。

デ Tm afraid IFm rather ( ) of hearing.| Wonld you speak a Hittle louder and more clearly, please? | | 月 ル角CGC( 。 ⑥⑯ challenging @② 衣" 人 @ hard ⑳ iroubled シス

なぜ2番になりますか？ 教えてください！！

/ am の At the conference, the ambassador ppealed for a nuclear ( agreement. 0⑩ /arm @ arms @⑳ hand ⑳ hands )

見にくくてすみません💦 問1の答えをお願いしたいです🥺

| 2 | 火の玉を読んで, 設問に答えなさい。ただし。 ポのついでいる本に関し とめて注があります。 9 (ご部省略) what then is populismz The answer to this simple question ia bi Clear But one can, 』 suppose, say (hat populism reflects a deep suspicion of th blishment: that this establishment in the view of most populists does not just ionw of fordgncrs (though this N more Idy to be fimd on the figh than the they are sceptical* of the facts 4s provided to them by the cstablishmeni es (and again this is truer of the right than the lef() they dont muell intellectuals. Nor in general do they Jike big cties and the metropoltan types who h e in them: They are (to use a term made popular by Dayid Goodhart) the'66議 イ | people who want to be part of somewhere [ ウ | thoseWhoe生計議 ndeed, the faut line* i and in most place or communi和yefsually a small town or in the Countryside socialy GO jess educated, and those who come from Anywhere: footloose*。 often urban 6 umiversity educated and who tend to feel at home nmearly evenywhere。 *somewheres' we have t0 understand, for it iS they | エ | who eonetute de PT what he sees as the populist revolt

教えてください　 お願いします🙇‍♀️

[31 ( )内の語(名) を適切に並べかえて. 英文を完成させましょう。 1. 若田光一さんは私のヒーロこ ーの一人です。 Wakata Koichi ( one / is / of/ my heroes ). kt eo† 品ッ heroes 2. 僕にとって, ギターを弾く ことは難しい。 Tjs 呈代cult (me /for / nlay the guitar / to )、. 3. メアリーがそのケーキを作ったこ とは明らかです。 北is clear (the cake / Mary / that / made ) ーートーcker 1 My sgde fhe cake 。