学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

なぜLeading anthropologistsで有力な人類学者になるんですか?解説お願いしますm(_ _)m

1購 強調 代動詞の do STEP UP 35 られる。 を結びつけている.ここは, 内容か 的すぐにわかる. が、「能力の成長[増大]」 と意をとるとうまくいく。 詞の that で主格である。 については,以下を参照。 * as far back as.. . STEP UP 36) 当なる原級比較表現と考えると意味がとれないas as~の表現があ z それは as ~の部分に主に数詞とか,数量に関わる語句がきている場合 話者が予想し想定していた基準と,くい違いがあったことを強調する as as+A(数詞)「A(と同じほど)も」 る。 に意思を伝え合うわれわれの衝動, そしてそうする能力の増大であった。 表現である。したがって, as as の には,意味に応じていろいろな ものがくる.主なものとして,次のようなものがある。 ③下線部(b) Leading anthropologists are now of the opinion that it was not so much aggressiveness asability to cooper. ate that gave the earliest forms of mana superiority over others of the ape family, and co-operation entails communi- cation. as long as two hours( 2 時間も) as many as ten mistakes (10個もの間違い) as much as five pounds ( 5 ポンドも) as far as 1000 miles(はるばる 1000 マイルも) * テーマ 29.30 not so much .. ( というよりもむしろ~)で結 で強調されている点を 1 as ~~ びつけられた名詞句が, 強調構文 It was that ~ ここでは far back が来ているので「 もさかのぼるほど前に」と意をと 見抜くことがポイント. that以下が gave(V) +the earliest forms of man (0) +a superiority (0) となっていることから, 先の下線部(a) と同様,主語 が強調されていることがわかる. この文も本講のテーマに関わっていたわけ る。 …, or hominids の or の用法には注意 ,or ~の形の時に,「つま リ/言いかえれば~」の意味になる場合がある。本文もこの用法, 不 had mastered は, 過去の時(ここでは75万年前)よりも前の時を示 したかったので, 過去完了形が用いられている。「すでに習得していた」の ,なお, 6の what had been ..も同じように考える。 だ。 なお,強調構文ではこの下線部のように, 強調されている部分に, not .… but ~/not only but also ~/not so much. . . as ~/ rather uier といった相関的に用いられる表現が入り込んでいる場合も多い、こ 表現上,知っておいてよい知識だ。 得していたものがあった。 らしか判断できないので, 難しいところ. ..と co-(S) +(V) .. .う 130 131

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

問3について ④みたいな選択肢のとき、ついついwhenを 「~とき」と訳してしまいます。 模範解答は「いつ、他者のそばに立つべきか」と書いてあったのですが、なぜこのときはwhenを「いつ、~」と訳してるんですか?どういうときに「いつ」と訳せばいいんでしょうか? あと、「~... 続きを読む

第6問(配点 24) A findings to your classmates. social positions. Personal Space and Culture Hall also told an interesting story illustrating cultural influenee, He was Sitting alone on a chair in the lobby of a hotel when an unfamiliar Arabian man came within arm's length) The man looked as if he was waiting for someone and stood in front of than an Asian person. strangers. him. Due to his personal space being violated, he felt very uncomfortable and tried to show his discomfort, but the Arab did not seem to notice at all) Hall had no idea why the man was standing so close, thinking that even in a public place like a hotel lobby, someone's personal space should be respected by others. Afterward, when he 0 taik with your friends even when thev are closer than this distance. However, you met his Arab friend, Hall asked why the man had acted so rudely. His friend said, “That's just an American idea. Arabs believe that personal space does not exist for anyone in a public place like a hotel lobby." Furthermore, a distance of less than 1.5 feet (46cm) from you is called *“intimate In a globalized society, knowledge of cultural influence on interpersonal distance aistance." Since physical contact with others is likely to occur within this distance, is necessary in daily life/ People from different cultural backgrounds have a personal only those who have a very close relationship with you are allowed to come nearer space of a different size, and it is very likely that you will mistakenly violate their than that. By contrast, when you step into a stranger's space formed by intimate personal space. This may sometimes cause(serious trouble, Therefore, understanding distance, they may feel that you are trying to frighten them or physically attack them. the sense of interpersonal distances in other cultures will help avoid conflict with Hall classifies “personal distance” and “intimate distance” as someone's personal others. space. The space outside of your personal space can also be divided into two types, depending on the distance./ A distance of between 4 feet (1.2m) and 12 feet (3.7m) from you is called “social distance," and a distance of more than 12 feet away from you is called"distance." in non-situations, in business or parties, place at a social . On the other hand, a public distance is a public speech. You also to keep this distance when meeting people in important The point here is that , , the same for all , but are by your or, , by the culture you belong to. , that people in South , in , space than people in Asia, a South will allow a to get closer 3- 31 3- 30

解決済み 回答数: 2
英語 高校生

答えが無くて分からないので教えて欲しいです

SIMなし合 22:01 Cop 【1】次の英文を読んで, 設問 1~12に答えなさい。 なお, *印の語(句)には文末に注 がついています。 Modern examinations of working conditions in British and U.S. industry in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries concentrate mainly on the experiences, Complaints, and overall difficulties of working-class laborers. The first complaint that a majority of industrial workers had was that their workdays* were too long. The average (ア) of hours in a shift varied from industry to industry, from place to place, and from era to era. Workers in British and American textile mills* in the early to middle 1800s generally worked twelve to fifteen hours, six days a week, ( イ) only Sundays off. Their average workweek* was seventy-eight hours. In contrast were the hours of workers who labored in American steel mills in the late 1800s. The length of their shifts was determined by the fact that the blast furnaces* they tended almost always operated twenty-four hours a day. Thus, (oit became customary* for steel mills to have two twelve-hour shifts. However, many of the steel workers labored seven days a week. (a)That gave them a workweek of sighty-four hours. Moreover, sometimes they had to work extra hours on top of this demanding schedule. (オ )the minor differences in the length of workweeks from one industry to another, the average worker put in twelve-to fourteen-hour days at least six days a week, This harsh schedule remained more ( カ) less standard well into the twentieth century. It was not until 1920 that a fifty-hour workweek was introduced in the United States. Anda forty-hour week did not become the rule in most industries until 1938. Low wages was another common complaint of industrial workers. In 1851, the average wage earned by American industrial workers in general was seven to ten dollars per week. That same year New York's Daily Tribune* reported that a worker's family of five required just over ten dollars a week just for basics such as rent, food, and fuel. Most ordinary workers could not afford many simple comforts that middle-class workers enjoyed. (o This miserable situation lasted in America for decades and improved only slowly. As late as 1912, a study found that only 15

回答募集中 回答数: 0