学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

最初の例文のforなんですけどinでもいいですかね? 現在からの時間(未来)ならinと習ったので、、 後同じ場所の walk〜とあるんですが、文構造が理解できないので教えてくれると助かります

as ~ 表現 / should の特別用法 無視しないのと同じか無視しても十分に (well) よろしい (may)」です。「どっちでも同 ~ as は本当はイコールつき不等号 (≧) なので、直訳は「メールを無視するのは、 じだけど、まあ強いて言えば」 というなげやり・あきらめ妥協などのニュアンスで、 | may に毛が生えたオススメ度 51%という感じです。 ※よく「~したほうがよい」と訳されますが、これでは「かなりオススメ」と誤解されてしまいます さらに 05-80 The bus won't get here for another 10 minutes, and it's just a 15-minute walk from here, so we might as well walk. ※ may as well ~ ≒ might as well あと10分はバスが来ないし、 ここから歩いてもたった15分だから、歩いてもいいね。 might as well ~ as... 「・・・するくらいなら~するほうがましだ」 You might as well throw your money into the sea as lend it to him. 彼に金を貸してやるくらいなら海に捨てるほうがましだよ。 bluodeater ve You might as well throw your money into the sea as lend it to him. お金を海に捨てる 彼に貸す 直訳 「海に金を捨てるのは、彼に金を貸すのと同じかそれ以上に十分によろしい」 → ① 「彼に金を貸すのは、海に投げ捨てるようなもの」 bnen → ② 「彼に金を貸すくらいなら、 海に捨てたほうがましだ」 erimetab-ebioeb 05-81 ※どちらの訳でもOKですが、 ②で使われることが多いです/ 「海に捨てたほうがまし」と言われて本当に捨 てるわけはないので (may ではなく) might で仮定法(あくまで仮の話)のニュアンスを出すことが多いです +a might as well~の2つの可能性 might as well s... の後半のas以下が省略されて、may[might] as well ~as... 「~してもいいだろう」 と見た目が同じになることもあります。ただ実際には 「51%の 軽い提案(~してもいいだろう)」 というありえる話なのか、「オーバーな提案 ( 〜するよう 「なものだ)」というありえない話なのかで区別できます。 That's a terrible investment. You mighGONE005-82 as throw your money away. あれはひどい投資だ。 お金を捨てるのと同じだよ。※as 以下省略のオーバーな提案

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

英文の方写真汚くて申し訳ないです汗  3パラグラフ目の印のしてあるaround が、和訳中のどの部分に当たるか分かりません。教えていただきたいです。

テーマ 専門性☆☆☆ 英文レベル★★★ 30 DNAはウイルスから? 文 11 What with the threat of bird flu, the reality of HIV, and the genera unseemliness of having one's cells pressed into labour on behalf of something alien and microscopic, it is small wonder that people don't much like viruses. But we may actually have something to thank the little 5 parasites for. They may have been the first creatures to find a use for DNA, a discovery that set life on the road to its current rich complexity 12 The origin of the double helix is a more complicated issue than it might at first seem. DNA's ubiquity -all cells use it to store their genomes - suggests it has been around since the earliest days of life 10 but when exactly did the double spiral of bases first appear? Some think it was after cells and proteins had been around for a while. Others say DNA showed up before cell membranes had even been invented/ The fact that different sorts of cell make and copy the molecule in very different ways has led others to suggest that the charms of the double 15 helix might have been discovered more than once. And all these ideas have drawbacks. "To my knowledge, up to now there has been no ⚫ convincing story of how DNA originated," says evolutionary biologist Patrick Forterre of the University of Paris-Sud, Orsay. 13 Forterre claims to have a solution. Viruses, he thinks, invented » DNA as a way the defences of the cells they infected. Little more than packets of genetic material, viruses are notoriously adept at* avoiding detection, as influenza's annual self-reinvention attests. Forterre argues that viruses were up to similar tricks when life was young, and that DNA was one of their innovations. To some researchers 25 the idea is an appealing way to fill in a chunk of the DNA puzzle. 270 •

解決済み 回答数: 2
英語 高校生

31行のitは何を指していますか?itがthingを指しているのかとも思ったのですがそれだとundurstandの後に名詞の穴ができてしまっておかしいのではないかと思いました。教えて頂きたいです。

25 out of twenty native Alaskan languages, 冬の最 Although language extinction is sad for the people involved, why should the rest of us care? What effect will other people's language loss have on the future of people who (A): speak English, for example? Replacing a minor language with a more widespread ・ゆる可能 124) = permit . 20 one may even seem like a good thing, allowing people to communicate with each other more easily. But language diversity is as important as biological diversity. といい hot all ~70% Andrew Woodfield, director of the Centre for Theories of Language and Learning 1-14 in Bristol, England, suggested in a 1995 seminar on language conservation that people do not yet know all the ways in which linguistic diversity is important. "The fact is, no one knows exactly what riches are hidden inside the less-studied languages," he says. Woodfield compares one argument for conserving unstudied endangered plants - that they may be medically valuable with the argument for conserving endangered languages. We have inductive evidence based on past studies of well-known danguages that there will be riches, even though we do not know what they will be 単語 をだすことが It seems (B) 30 paradoxical but it's true. By allowing.languages to die out, the human race is destroying 便 4714 things doesn't understand," he argues. (243) Stephen Wurm, in his introduction to the Atlas of the World's Languages in Danger 1-1

解決済み 回答数: 1