学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

答えの冊子無くしちゃいました💦答え合わせのためにも助けてください😀

口02 IfI have 2enough money, I would pay you g what I owe. Lo1or your help, I 』 could not be th ne project. 口03 If Tom。had been more careful in driving, he 。wouldn't have Crashing 口04 IwishI have time to talk, but I'm afraid I'm 。too busy today. Would , )water, nothing on earth could live. 2 Without 口10 の Except O But 3 Having ( ) the sun and water, all living things would not survive. EX O But for 2 If not 3If with Chapter の If they were not for He came running all the way to school: ( hed have been late. の unless 口12 O however 2 because 3 otherwise (神奈川 )water, no animal could live on earth. 2with bluou 口13 Ifit were not ( の for 3 about の of (広島容 )your help, I would have given up. deian s'abluoo 口14 Ifit( The hakPala 2 had not been 起s bluow S Owere not belas vert das bluarls ③ had not been for のwere without (第。 botas bad ® What a mess! It's about time you ( 0r would )your room! 2will clean 3 have cleaned 口15 O cleaned の clean 〈平安女学物 1n anch trouble now. ) the post man would come!” you waiting for a letter from your girlfriend?” 2If only VilO Why 口16 ( “Are RAA Jaol O When の Please (近動 od f'manw S ed faow D EXERCISE B 英文には誤りが1箇所ずつある。番号を指摘し,正しく直しなさい。 pomg poas aaccept his invitation to the 9V w ( : party. 01 のlfI。wereyou, I g) 2 will 〈立正大 8ibon as e atay at. he 3 〈東海大) T0 2②. 3 ARAL 9m0 bad ) の into the wall. 1 blaorl fce, we would never have fin 〈名城大) OUOe mi teomis fycnd 2 の mind Coming back tomorrow? 3 you 〈南山大) the の 口05 But od ) PP く東洋大) ロ

未解決 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

長文どなたか教えてほしいです。 不安なんで…

ロ には 唱】 火のスピーチ放入を読んで、下紀の癌に和えなさい。 なおの人た家 本文の後に注があります。 As an old science reporter Tnd myselfin a diHfenlt position todai 0 Tighrtech executives on the topic of artifcial inteligence or AI Fnn surecoll 際。 far more about AI than 1 do. Stil. 1 think I can contribute some historical perspectHVe. Thave been writing science columns since many cf you were kids ( Z ) Hmrote my frst column on AT back in 1963。 Tm( イ ) because when T say *artifcial intelhgence"Tm talking about something that Tm not sure really exists. Those of you who have read my articlealand books on the subject know that Tbehieve in what we call imealk AT' and that 1 aminotieal onvineed by what we call srongALy oto Whats the difference? Lets say we program a computer to say Rhank youl in situations where real people would feel grateful. 1 think we could make eally sound like a thankful person。 Tm sure that such a machine and tuned so well that it could fool me were blindfolded But here's the question: Did the program actually feel thankf me? Or did the team who wrote the program thank me? Was According to the strong AL approach, the computer really couldibe ex According to weak AI, iCs just a machine making sounds。 Tim reminded of an old classic comedyy routine imagined a future world in which computers made 。 people really worried about that in the 1960s. In this ima handled every decision that humans didmt like making. One fmring other computers. So the comedy routine consists of a conm ose computer ecplaine to worker computer why itmust be fred The reason this comedy routine is interesting js not just bec because it expresses fears about strong AI。 ICs int 50 years ago- That's right。 a halfrcentury ago。 people uman decisions.They thoughtit might happ8mi the future.( ウ ).the predicted robotdominant、 Im my opinion, no matter how impressed none of us realiy believes that truly selfraware di exist. Tknow youre ll experts on AI but ileEs rogram, no matter how sophisticeted,( 王 ) marmyi jn or reject God. or say “Tlove you and mean it W cperatipg the machine-or who wrote the Dio As a real. thinking person who has obaerved tk research for many yearsu Tbelieve there will alaya bela efieve that no matter how sophisticated ATbeoon as a thinking person。T also know that 1 can be wi the future of science. Perhaps momeday those of yo

未解決 回答数: 1