学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

至急!!私立大学看護学部の過去問です。答えがないため、回答を作って欲しいです!!科目は英語です。

問題番号に対応 効とする。 うち受験票お researchers at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna, Austria, have found. Dogs won't give food to a human, even if that person gave them some food first, and that they would help other dogs that had helped them before. Therefore, the team Previous studies have shown that dogs can recognize cooperative and uncooperative humans, "reciprocal altruism"- that is, doing a good thing in return to a human who had given expected to find that their test subjects would put these two things together and show To start, the team trained a group of 37 dogs to press a button which would activate a them food first. *enclosure with the dispenser, while one of (2) two humans was in a separate enclosure with the button. One would press the button to food dispenser. Then, they put each dog in an would not. Each dog was paired with both humans in give food to the dog, and (4) unhelpful one. turn. After that, the researchers switched over the button and the dispenser. They expected that the dogs would press the button to give food to the helpful human but not to the though the dogs did press the button, they did it just as often when either human had the food dispenser, and even when no human was there at all. "In these kinds of studies (5) [perform / to / dogs / which/ trained / are in a particular behavior for an experiment, they will usually do the behavior a few times as they have simply learned the association between the behavior and getting a reward, and it may be enjoyable for them to do the behavior," said Jim McGetrick, a PhD student at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna who led the research. 身を正しく が本冊子 1番 2 次の英文を読んで下の設問に答えなさい。 (3) giving us some food? Are they a combination of reasons. "It is (6) Why wouldn't our best pals want to help us out by secretly all bad boys and girls? McGetrick believes there is possible that the dogs did not understand enough about the task to realize that only one of the humans was providing them with food," he said. It could also be because they didn't fully understand the button and dispenser system, or because they were too focused on the food to notice whether a particular human was pressing the button or not. "Having said all that, even if they did completely understand the task and were fully attentive to the actions of the humans, there is still a good possibility that they wouldn't have given food back in return," he added. "It could be that providing food to a dog as they do not typically do that in everyday life." After all, humans are the ones who human is something very strange for (7) already have food, from a dog's perspective. why would your pet need to worry about (8) making sure you have enough? However, all the humans in the study were people the dogs didn't know. "It is quite 5

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

赤丸をつけたところが分かりません。ちなみに、【】は副詞句・副詞節、()は形容詞句・形容詞節、〈〉は名詞句・名詞節です。 1つ目の赤マルは、なぜthat以下が副詞節なのか(自分は名詞節だと思った) 2つ目はの赤マルは、何のofか

[At the turn of the twentieth century, a remarkable horse (named Hans) was paraded [through Germany] [by his owner Wilhelm von S M Osten, a horse trainer and high-school mathematics teacher. Not only could "Clever Hans" understand complex questions (put to him 同格のカンマ 「すなわち」 V S in plain German) 構文図解 M M O 過去分詞の名詞修 [If Tuesday falls on the eighth of the month M - but he could answer them by 0 M M what date is the following Friday?" not only A but (also) B S C S tapping out the correct number] [with his hoof]. [Using this simple V M with 「~を使って」 分詞構文「~して」 M response], it appeared [that Hans could add, subtract, multiply, and S V M add, subtract, multiply, divide divide, tell the time, understand the calendar, and both read and add ~ divide, tell the time, understand the calendar, both words spell words]. Suspicious, the German board (of education) appointed S M M V Being 省略の分詞構文 a commission, (including circus trainers, veterinarians, teachers, and 0 「~を含んだ」 M circus trainers, veterinarians, teachers, psychologists psychologists), to investigate the situation. Surprisingly, they to do C M S concluded [in 1904] <that no trick was involved>. This did not satisfy V V M S O 名詞節のthat the board, and the case was passed [to psychologist Oskar Pfungst) O S V M [for experimental investigation]. [Braving both the horse's and M 名詞節のthat observer of human behavior >. M owner's notoriously bad tempers], Pfungst finally was able to 分詞構文 「~して」 S M V demonstrate <that Hans was no mathematician, but rather a fine not[no] A but (rather) B[ATTB 20 t を使っ 教育

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

223の前文の内容全体を受けると 224の前文の内容の1部を受けるの意味がわからないです。教えて欲しいです。🙇‍♀️💦

果はのにらっ思し、そこで幸せに暮らした。 のthat 非制限用法の関係副詞 where は,「そしてそこで(and there)」の意味を Focus (中部大 He learned to speak fluent Japanese in only one year 大 表す。 223 alao空所の後ろが完全な文の形になっているから、 関係代名詞は使えない。 ) surprised me. O that 人 623 非制限用法の which-前文の内容全体を受ける 2who 訳彼はたった1年で流暢な日本語を話すようになり,そのことに私は驚 3 いた。 10 非制限用法の関係代名詞 which は、前文の内容(全部または一部)を先行 詞とすることがあり, そしてそのことは [を]~ の意味を表す。 3which の it 6 this |答 く芝浦工業大) (a) John said that he did not know her, but it was not true. V 224 Focus most (b) John said that he did not know her, ( 224 非制限用法の which一前文の内容の一部を受ける true. )was not 答 >この文の which の先行詞は「ジョンが彼女を知らない」という内容。ここでは.. he did not know her, which was not true.と,〈人〉(her) の後ろに which が 続いているが、〈人〉 に続くからといって, ②whoを選ばないこと。 の 訳 ジョンは彼女を知らないと言ったが、それは本当ではなかった。 D as 2 who 3 what のwhich MpA2AS く実践女子大) fen bos a son [ahol graduated friom 1he Uurversiry of Thyo ir attedT PFinder 075 関係詞の制限用法と非制限用法 関係詞節が後ろから先行詞を修飾する用法→例文 (a) 関係詞節が先行詞を補足的に説明する用法→例文(b) Aの) 制限用法 回人eいるRgaうs (が軟に行た wy 0 非制限用法 (a) I have two daughters who are unmarried. (私には未婚の娘が2人いる)(娘がほかにもいるという含みがある》 (b) I have two daughters, who [=andthey] are unmarried. (私には娘が2人おり, どちらも未婚だ)(娘は2人しかいない) * 非制限用法で用いられる関係詞は, which, wh0, whom, whose, when, w that は非制限用法では使えない。 wod ai aidiT er ken has a Safaha gndaaied from the Coてvesiyof Tthro 固句 220 accidentally 「誤って」 223 fuent「流暢な」 りゅうちょう

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

272番と273番の問題なのですが、疑問代名詞と疑問副詞の違いがわからないです💦

ロロ ロロ ロロ ロロ ロロ Focus 059 Part 1 文法 間接疑問 I really want to know ( future. 272 将来私に何が起こるのかをほんとうに知りたい。 3 which の how てES Owhat 2 that Focus 部問詞の後は〈S + V> という平叙文と同じ語順になる。 lbdd ad ) he looks so happy these days. 3 when why T0i gollo9 03<大阪国際大) く杏林大) (大曜は) >次のように考える。 □ 273 I wonder ( (a) I really want to know (私は~をほんとうに知りたい) O how 2what 278 -する。このとき(b)は(S + V) の語順になるが, What(S) + will hannen (V という平叙文の語順なので,そのまま(a)の最後に置けばよい。 274 Don't forget to ask Jackie ( ) from the station to her oOTOG Jfa house. 273 間接疑問 (疑問副詞) ① how far is it 2 how far it is 訳最近彼はなぜあんなにうれしそうなのかしら。 答 ③ itisfar ④ is it far *(a) I wonder (b)を間接疑問((S + V)の語順)にすると, why he looks となる。 + (b) Why does he look so happy these days? と考える。 く安田女子大) 279 274 間接疑問 (疑問副詞) 彼女がライバル会社のことを話したとき,どの会社のことを言っていた かわかりますか。 275 he hotal2 答 2 訳駅から家までの距離はどのくらいか, ジャッキーに忘れずに聞いてね。 mo >(a) Don't forget to ask Jackie her house? と考える。(b) を聞間接疑問にすると, how far it is となる。 + (b) How far is it from the station to Do you know ( she spoke of rivals? 15cw )when 275 疑問詞の位置 (Do you know +疑問詞 ?) O she 2 company 3 referring to ④ which の2053 Do you know (which company she was referring to) whem 答 (5) was she spoke of rivals? >(a) Do you know |? + (b) Which company was she referring to when く東京経済大》 と考える((b) は過去進行形の疑問文)。(b) を問接疑問にすると, which compan. 二酸化炭素を減らす最良の方法は何だと思いますか。 281 276 G7 uy she was referring to となる。 ed ) way to 容 worl TS 276 疑問詞の位置(疑問詞+ do you think ?) reduce CO2? の the 答 326750④ (What do you think is the best) way to reduce CO:? 2 do 3what の best 5 is you ⑦ think PFinder 086 〈疑問詞+do you think ?〉 型の表現 く拓殖大》 (a) How old is he? (彼は何歳ですか) 日口

回答募集中 回答数: 0
1/3