学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

答え→4、4、3、1、2で合ってると思いますか⁇ 違うと思ったらどこがどう違うのか教えて欲しいです‼︎お願いします🤲

u an article to help you prepare for te jsh teacher gaVe 9 e co Englisl ith one of the comment S Your part O debate in the next class. 信 is shown beloW- 1のせこ ild's Roomn uorv @ amoe Of Chil Signifit By Cathy Becker | | | | s friends to their own room, | hild with a shared room. | 1 f this article Wr son said,“Tf a child invite: 品 than 8C de when 8 friend visits." Johnson | gs children | sharing 8 TOOT brin in reality is the opposite. The | Doctor Johni theyTl learn about manners faste Also, it give them a SenSe of pri also said, Many parents used to feel closer. Howeyer。 we know now that 8 ッ ]ack of personal SDace CauS8 conflict and argument8. | | Tn other words, children that have their own roomm are better at | nandling responsibility and mature 8OOn6r than children that dont. They can customize and choose what they want in their roorn。 glving hem control over their environment that teaches them about control and decision making. It also gives them: Self-confidenee, which is crucial for a child. It seems to be a comnmon trend to give them their own roonn as early in their childhood as possible. On the other hand, not all parentS agTee・ One parent said, “Contrary to recent popular belief, there are advantages to sharing 8 room. Children will learn to 匠6goti8te and commpromise Another parent added, “By sharing 8 rOOm children will draw a lne and take ownership of their belongings, Which is great for character building. Also, it helps them accept others and their differences.“ @ CommentS Ajieia Grant 了have 2 daughters and they share a room at the moment、One is neat and the oher js messy, so theyre always arguing! Were thinkmg ot

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

英語の長文問題です。問3、問4の答え2.4、2であってると思いますが⁇ 問3の根拠→L4〜6、L39〜42 問4の根拠→全体的に見てそう判断しました。 答え違くない⁇と思ったら何番になるかも教えて下さい💦お願いします🤲

1 m bits 8 ,。 eating ha Y。 ing people'8 6 cle to re8 旭 You are studying 科Yan 0 her gaV@ nutrition. Your もGaC open人 od re8i informafion available at fast fo Americans the busy jifestyle of eve that than COO 2 to be higher in fat and ls Many health experts beji Ss more CO Jeads to eating out at restaurant: king and eating od tend 6 tf home. Unfortunately, restaurant fo rts_ believe that | に exDe choi eals. Health Jesterol than home-cooked Tn 1 i can make ition 1 eopJe becomn, re aware of nutr better choices_when_selecting_what to_eat。 Many restaurants provide petker choi 3 ent e goVernrn iti ntent. Th nformation such as calories and nutrition CO 1 the le are uS1ng asked a study team to examine whether peoP nformation they are given. 陣 局/ mn fact, Jaws and regulations have been created 了 tried to peopes eating habits. Some local governments have ( ules abou adver好sennents for unhealthy food. They have also made r に rOaC what foods and drinks are sold at schools. One successful app taken was to force food companies to use labels explaining what 上沼と7 exacy was in the food they sold. The laws required that the calories る contained jm food and drinks have to be shown. This was good for Sixahom、 foogd naz peope buy and cook at home. Many local governments SCarted reguiring that restaurants show the calorie information. Tn 7acz one Survey found that 54% of large restaurant chains showed 太e calorje mformation on their menus. Tjhe sudy ream hoped to find that the information required by d their awW2areCTCSS Of d about nutrition > 交 10 15 20 25

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

星マークの付いている文(Are there limits beyond which offensive or hateful speech deserves to be suppressed by state power?)のところの訳(2枚目星マーク)が意訳なのか、どうし... 続きを読む

| | Read the PaSsage and answer the questions below. In the summer of 1990, a group of teenagers in the city of St Paul, Minnesota, burned a cross in front of the house of an African-American family. The teenagers were arrested and charged with violating a St. Paul law called the “Bias-motivated Crime Ordinance.” The law made which one knows or has reasonable grounds to know arouses anger, alarm or ツ it iegal to place “on public or private property a symbol .… resentment in others on the basis of race, color, creed, religion or gender.” The teenagers challenged the legal basis of their arrest。 and in 1992、 the US Supreme Court declared the St. Paul aw an unconstitutional violation of freedom of speech. A European court would almost certainly have decided the case differently. Domestic national courts in Europe, as well as the European Court of Human Rights, are far more likely than their American counterparts to | 16 | “extreme speech"- speech that offends personal dignity on the basis of factors such as race ethnicity。 religion and sexual orientation. HateG crime prohibitions are familiar throughout Europe - laws that would not stand a chance of being accepted as constitutional in the United States. The differences between American and European approaches to the law raise pressing questions about the nature and limits of expressive freedom in democratic nations. What role, if any, should the law play in democracies in policing speech? there imits beyond which offensive or hateful speech deserves to be suppressed by state power? Do efforts to punish extreme speech produce a healthier democracy? ② One way to determine the extent to which free speech should be guaranteed would be to take into consideration the cultural and historical 2 ン 。 に

未解決 回答数: 1