学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

答えと解説お願いします!!

Scientists **complain about noise **pollution. It damages animals, plants, and people. animals and plants need beautiful music. But they don't like big, *4terrible noises. 学習日 9) The Magic of Music 音楽の不思議な力カ 1 The history of music is very old. People all over the world have always loved it s there anyone who doesn't like music? Probably the answer is no. Music is one of the most necessary things in life. Maybe people can't live without music. Do animals and plants like music, too? Do they understand music? 5 2 Oneday Mrs. Evans read a very interesting story in the newspaper. A *1 "university professor found out that her plants became stronger when music was played for them. At first she thought thatit was a joke, but she wanted to try it 2) herself. She built two rooms in the garden and put the same kind of vegetables in both rooms. The temperature of the rooms was the same and both of them were very quiet. Music was played in one room. The other room was silent. She was 3) 10 surprised to find that the next day the vegetables that she played music for became taller than the ones in the silent room. 3 In the United States, there was a farmer who kept many cows. The farmer was very interested in music. When he stayed at home, he always listened to music on the radio. One day he took his radio to the farm. When he was *2milking his cows, 15 the radio was playing beautiful music. He found that the cows gave more milk *than 1usual on that day. He wanted to know the reason, and three months later he 4) learned that he could get more milk when the cows listened to beautiful, quiet music. 4 Today many scientists say that animals and plants also enjoy music. Like Us, 20 *4 *5 They say that we must think about many kinds of noises we are making every that We day. 1 313 words I

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

答えの冊子無くしちゃいました💦答え合わせのためにも助けてください😀

口02 IfI have 2enough money, I would pay you g what I owe. Lo1or your help, I 』 could not be th ne project. 口03 If Tom。had been more careful in driving, he 。wouldn't have Crashing 口04 IwishI have time to talk, but I'm afraid I'm 。too busy today. Would , )water, nothing on earth could live. 2 Without 口10 の Except O But 3 Having ( ) the sun and water, all living things would not survive. EX O But for 2 If not 3If with Chapter の If they were not for He came running all the way to school: ( hed have been late. の unless 口12 O however 2 because 3 otherwise (神奈川 )water, no animal could live on earth. 2with bluou 口13 Ifit were not ( の for 3 about の of (広島容 )your help, I would have given up. deian s'abluoo 口14 Ifit( The hakPala 2 had not been 起s bluow S Owere not belas vert das bluarls ③ had not been for のwere without (第。 botas bad ® What a mess! It's about time you ( 0r would )your room! 2will clean 3 have cleaned 口15 O cleaned の clean 〈平安女学物 1n anch trouble now. ) the post man would come!” you waiting for a letter from your girlfriend?” 2If only VilO Why 口16 ( “Are RAA Jaol O When の Please (近動 od f'manw S ed faow D EXERCISE B 英文には誤りが1箇所ずつある。番号を指摘し,正しく直しなさい。 pomg poas aaccept his invitation to the 9V w ( : party. 01 のlfI。wereyou, I g) 2 will 〈立正大 8ibon as e atay at. he 3 〈東海大) T0 2②. 3 ARAL 9m0 bad ) の into the wall. 1 blaorl fce, we would never have fin 〈名城大) OUOe mi teomis fycnd 2 の mind Coming back tomorrow? 3 you 〈南山大) the の 口05 But od ) PP く東洋大) ロ

未解決 回答数: 1