数字で表せるもの＝単数扱いですか？

Section 122 The t f → 族 第12章·主語と述語動詞の一致 形は複数でも単数扱いする表現 左頁 (整理して覚える1036)参照 the United Nations 「国際連合」 the United Nations は多くの国々で構成された1つの団体なので,単数扱いとなる。 Fleld 画 Peyle/pobece 「時間,年齢,距離,金額,重量」などを表す語句は1つのまとまりと見なすので,単数 扱いが原則。Fifty miles is a long distance. 「50マイルは長距離だ」 主語 fty minutes は時間を表す語句で1つのまとまりと見なすので、単数扱いにな%。 徳大) → 松族 atln ●「時間」を表す語句が主語一単数扱い Field 2 語 〈関西学院大) 選択肢 |時間」 を表すtime は不可算名詞なので、 times となっている③とOは不可。 Eie Section 123 注意すべき主語と述語動詞の一致 the +形容詞= (形容詞+ people)一複数扱い な人る 45 Fleld 整理して覚える」 037 (the +形容詞)[…な人々」1d (=(形容詞+ people))の表現例 the rich[wealthy] 「金持ち」。 口 the old[elderly] 「老人」。 〈南山大) the poor 「貧しい人々」 口the young 「若者」, 口 the digabled 「障がい者」, 口 the injured [wounded] 「負傷者」。 口the sick「病人」, 口the living 「生きている人」 の注意 主語になる場合は複数扱いとなる。 コ they,had ol Fileld 〈立命館大) 口 the dead「死者」 een a 〈先行詞+主格の関係代名詞+動詞 ) の場合一先行詞に一致 5 n 46 Feld 主格の関係代名詞に導かれる関係詞節内の動詞は先行詞に一致させる。 *people に続く主格の関係代名詞節内では先行詞 people に動詞を一致させる。先行詞 (京都産業大) ので、節内の動詞② was を were に訂正する。 編3イディオム M4 会話表現 ボキャプラリー 1 文法 ロ ロロロ

4択問題です。教えてください。よろしくお願いします。

II. 次の( )内に入れるのに最も適当な表現を選び、記号で答えなさい。 1. Tom took a nap on the bench with his legs ( C. crossing a. cross b. crossed d. to cross 2. The factory laid ( a. off ) 200 workers because of the drop in sales. d. down b. away C. out 3. The bombblew( b. away )the wall to bits. c. forth a. in d. up 4. The number of cancer patients to whom the newly developed medicine had proved to be effective ( ) still limited. C. is a. are b. were d. was 5. The manager wouldn't ( a. allow )the employees to smoke in the office. b. make C. let d. have 6. Yuri prepared the three-year sales forecast ( used for a meeting with her superiors. b. that ) her department manager a. what C. but d. because 7. In the meeting, one of my classmates looked for a chair ( b. sitting on a. to sit on C. sitting down d. to sit down )for three hours. I had a very good time talking with my friend. We talked ( a. away 8. b. off C. Out d. up Some of the electricity generated in this power plant ( b. are sold 9. ) to other state. a. has been sold C. sell d. sells 10. Kate: Do you know what Mary did this morning? She wrote a letter. b. She was writing a letter. c. A letter was written by her. d. A letter was written by Mary.

このthanって前置詞ですか？？ than inと続いていいのでしょうか？ 教えてください🙇‍♀️🙇‍♀️

Even advanced nations of Western background, if they happen to be small, frequently find it necessary to utilize foreign languages for many purposes. A Danish scholar, for instance, will find it more sensible to publish in English for a world audience than in Danish for a limited number of fellow Danes.

4択問題です。教えてください。よろしくお願いします。

I. 次の( )内に入れるのに最も適当な表現を選び、記号で答えなさい。 1. Tom took a nap on the bench with his legs ( a. cross b. crossed C. crossing d. to cross )200 workers because of the drop in sales. 2. The factory laid ( a. off b. away C. out d. down ) the wall to bits. d. up 3. The bomb blew ( a. in b. away c. forth 4. The number of cancer patients to whom the newly developed medicine had proved to be effective ( a. are ) still limited. b. were c. is d. was 5. The manager wouldn't ( a. allow )the employees to smoke in the office. b. make c. let d. have 6. Yuri prepared the three-year sales forecast ( used for a meeting with her superiors. a. what )her department manager b. that c. but d. because 7. In the meeting, one of my classmates looked for a chair ( a. to sit on b. sitting on c. sitting down d. to sit down 8. Ihad a very good time talking with my friend. We talked ( a. away )for three hours. b. off C. out d. up 9. Some of the electricity generated in this power plant ( b. are sold )to other state. a. has been sold c. sell d. sells 10. Kate: Do you know what Mary did this morning? a. She wrote a letter. b. She was writing a letter. c. A letter was written by her. d. A letter was written by Mary.

一貫した内容を表すように下線部から不適切な一語を削除する問題です😵😵 教えていただきたいです🙏🙏

had supreme authority, day-to-day governance was carried out by local lords。 Their impact on how people's lives was also much more limited, since they did not attempt to regulate them so closely, nor did they attempt to provide most of the goods and services that modern states provide.

3行目のbroughtがなぜpeopleを修飾するものになるのか教えてください！！

TW 9189 ⑤ The novelist presents us with people. He tells us what kind of people they are, whether they are good, bad, or indifferent. Within the limits of a book he tells us what happens to the people brought to our attention. The story depends on what they do, and particularly what they do in relationship with each other. LOMT auLr Sug G: V STe co ngldo

上のアンダーラインは、proveの所がなぜturn outになるのか分かりません。 下のアンダーラインは(h)がなぜ1になるのか分かりません。 教えていただけると嬉しいです🙇‍♂️

People are amazed when the techniques are displayed in the media or at live events. They represent a fornm of mental connection many times false that can 訳 (g) prove quite comforting to the people whose minds are supposedly being “read." While there is nothing magical about these techniques, they are effective. Therefore, you should try to learn and practice them until you become skillful at both using them and recognizing when they are being used. In this way you can (h) benefit from 訳 their power while avoiding being tricked. ローL

4択問題です。教えてください。よろしくお願いします。

く練習5>(TOEIC 対策)次の( )内に入れるべき最も適切な語句を記号で選びなさい。 1. Presentation files ( )prior to the meeting to allow the staff to prepare CDs for each session ahead of time. (A) submitting (B) submitted (C) submit (D) will be submitted 2. The governor and industry leaders, including those of banking, ( state's growing real estate, housing, and construction industries. (A) discussing (B) will be discussed(C) are discussing(D) has discussed ) the 3. Some of the electricity generated in this power plant ( )to other states. (A) to sell (B) are sold (C) is sold (D) sel 4. Only senior citizens who have no family to take care of them can ( ) for the public housing downtown. (A) applied(B) apply (C) be applied (D) applies 5. The number of cancer patients to whom the newly developed medicine has proved to be effective ( ) still limited. (A) are (B) is (C) to be (D) can (ヒント) 1.プレゼンテーションのファイルは、スタッフが前もって各セッションのCD を準備で きるよう会議に先立って提出されるだろう。(※ 括弧の直後の prior は副詞。prior to~で、 「~に先立って」の意。) 2.知事と銀行業を含む経済界のトップたちは、州の成長しつつある不動産、住宅、建設産業に ついて話し合っている。(※ 括弧の直後には the state's growing real estate (州の成長しつ つある不動産)という名詞がある。また、主語は複数。) 3.この発電所で発電される電気のいくらかは、他州へ売られている。(※括弧の直後にあるの は前置詞 to で、名詞ではない。generated は electricity を修飾する過去分詞でこの文全体 の動詞(V)ではない。some of A は、Aが単数か複数かで扱いが決まる。) 4. 世話をしてくれる家族がいない高齢の市民だけが、中心街の公共住宅に申し込むことができ る。(※ 括弧の直後にあるのは前置詞 for で、名詞ではない。しかし、apply (申し込む)は 自動詞なので、受動態が作れない。(apply for ~:~に申し込む) また、Only からthem までが主部(S)。) 5.新しく開発された薬の効果があると証明されたがん患者の数は、まだ限られている。 (※ この文は受動態。主語は(the) number で単数です。主部は The number of cancer patients to whom the newly developed medicine has proved to be effective (新しく開発された薬の効果があると証明されたがん患者の数)です。)

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.