学年

教科

質問の種類

現代文 高校生

文学国語の朝井リョウさんの18歳の選択についての質問です。 バランスを失ってずるりと口からこぼれ出てしまった。」とは、どのようなことか、言い換えてみよう。13・10 「私の両手はあっという間にいっぱいになってしまった」とはどういうことか?14・13 「きれいなものは... 続きを読む

3 で 志望 結果的に、私は、第一志望の国立大学に落ちた。つまり、浪人をするか、どうにか合格 していた第二志望の私立大学へ進学するか、選ばなければならなくなった。 担任の先生、母、私。狭い部屋だった。第一志望を目指し、浪人。二志望に、進学 - 三人で面談をしていたとき、私の目の前にはそんな二つの選択肢があった。 両親や、当時の担任の先生は、浪人を現実的に考えてもいいのではないか、と言った。 もう一年間努力をすれば届かないわけではないかもしれないし、単純に金銭的な問題もあ った。そのあたりのことを考慮しても、一年間浪人をして、第一志望の大学をもう一度目 指すことが正しい選択なのではないか、という話になった。 あのとき私は、キャスター付きの椅子に座っていた。だからだろうか、心の奥底で決め ていた、いつか言おう、いつか言おうと考えていた言葉が、バランスを失ってずるりと口 1 からこぼれ出てしまった。 「浪人はしたくありません。」 なぜなら、と続けつつ、私は唾を飲み込んだ。 「書きたい話がたくさんあるからです。もう一年なんて我慢できません。」 自分の声が自分の耳に入ってきたとき、私は、なんて寒くて、若くて、青くて痛々しく 1 て、勘違いに満ちた発言だろうと思った。今思い出しても、恥ずかしくてたまらない。だ 十八歳の選択 5 語句 2 「バランスを失ってず るりと口からこぼれ出 てしまった。」とは、 どのようなことか、言 い換えてみよう。 世界を跨ぐ とある 考慮(遠慮・配慮) 勘違い(勘案・勘定)

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

至急!!私立大学看護学部の過去問です。答えがないため、回答を作って欲しいです!!科目は英語です。

問題番号に対応 効とする。 うち受験票お researchers at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna, Austria, have found. Dogs won't give food to a human, even if that person gave them some food first, and that they would help other dogs that had helped them before. Therefore, the team Previous studies have shown that dogs can recognize cooperative and uncooperative humans, "reciprocal altruism"- that is, doing a good thing in return to a human who had given expected to find that their test subjects would put these two things together and show To start, the team trained a group of 37 dogs to press a button which would activate a them food first. *enclosure with the dispenser, while one of (2) two humans was in a separate enclosure with the button. One would press the button to food dispenser. Then, they put each dog in an would not. Each dog was paired with both humans in give food to the dog, and (4) unhelpful one. turn. After that, the researchers switched over the button and the dispenser. They expected that the dogs would press the button to give food to the helpful human but not to the though the dogs did press the button, they did it just as often when either human had the food dispenser, and even when no human was there at all. "In these kinds of studies (5) [perform / to / dogs / which/ trained / are in a particular behavior for an experiment, they will usually do the behavior a few times as they have simply learned the association between the behavior and getting a reward, and it may be enjoyable for them to do the behavior," said Jim McGetrick, a PhD student at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna who led the research. 身を正しく が本冊子 1番 2 次の英文を読んで下の設問に答えなさい。 (3) giving us some food? Are they a combination of reasons. "It is (6) Why wouldn't our best pals want to help us out by secretly all bad boys and girls? McGetrick believes there is possible that the dogs did not understand enough about the task to realize that only one of the humans was providing them with food," he said. It could also be because they didn't fully understand the button and dispenser system, or because they were too focused on the food to notice whether a particular human was pressing the button or not. "Having said all that, even if they did completely understand the task and were fully attentive to the actions of the humans, there is still a good possibility that they wouldn't have given food back in return," he added. "It could be that providing food to a dog as they do not typically do that in everyday life." After all, humans are the ones who human is something very strange for (7) already have food, from a dog's perspective. why would your pet need to worry about (8) making sure you have enough? However, all the humans in the study were people the dogs didn't know. "It is quite 5

回答募集中 回答数: 0