学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

至急!!私立大学看護学部の過去問です。答えがないため、回答を作って欲しいです!!科目は英語です。

問題番号に対応 効とする。 うち受験票お researchers at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna, Austria, have found. Dogs won't give food to a human, even if that person gave them some food first, and that they would help other dogs that had helped them before. Therefore, the team Previous studies have shown that dogs can recognize cooperative and uncooperative humans, "reciprocal altruism"- that is, doing a good thing in return to a human who had given expected to find that their test subjects would put these two things together and show To start, the team trained a group of 37 dogs to press a button which would activate a them food first. *enclosure with the dispenser, while one of (2) two humans was in a separate enclosure with the button. One would press the button to food dispenser. Then, they put each dog in an would not. Each dog was paired with both humans in give food to the dog, and (4) unhelpful one. turn. After that, the researchers switched over the button and the dispenser. They expected that the dogs would press the button to give food to the helpful human but not to the though the dogs did press the button, they did it just as often when either human had the food dispenser, and even when no human was there at all. "In these kinds of studies (5) [perform / to / dogs / which/ trained / are in a particular behavior for an experiment, they will usually do the behavior a few times as they have simply learned the association between the behavior and getting a reward, and it may be enjoyable for them to do the behavior," said Jim McGetrick, a PhD student at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna who led the research. 身を正しく が本冊子 1番 2 次の英文を読んで下の設問に答えなさい。 (3) giving us some food? Are they a combination of reasons. "It is (6) Why wouldn't our best pals want to help us out by secretly all bad boys and girls? McGetrick believes there is possible that the dogs did not understand enough about the task to realize that only one of the humans was providing them with food," he said. It could also be because they didn't fully understand the button and dispenser system, or because they were too focused on the food to notice whether a particular human was pressing the button or not. "Having said all that, even if they did completely understand the task and were fully attentive to the actions of the humans, there is still a good possibility that they wouldn't have given food back in return," he added. "It could be that providing food to a dog as they do not typically do that in everyday life." After all, humans are the ones who human is something very strange for (7) already have food, from a dog's perspective. why would your pet need to worry about (8) making sure you have enough? However, all the humans in the study were people the dogs didn't know. "It is quite 5

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

赤で囲った部分 noneとかbothとかが代名詞で使われるイメージがないのですが 具体的にはどういう感じでしょうか

整理して覚える | 039 否定には, すべてを否定する 「全否定」 と, 一部を否定する 「部分否定」という表現がある。 否定するものが2つ [2人] の場合と3つ [3人] 以上の場合ではそれぞれ表現が異なる。 Shishoqata 3つ [3人] not ... any 以上 2つ [2人] not ... either (+単数名詞) = neither (+単数名詞) 「どちら (の〈名詞>) も···ない」 .. 代名詞・形容詞を用いた全否定と部分否定の表現 「すべて [どれも] ・・・ない」 eee not any +名詞 = no +名詞 「すべての 〈名詞〉が[どの〈名詞> も] ではない」 「・・・ない」 none (of A ) 「(AD) 何一つ・・・ない / (A の) だれ 一人・・・ない」 部分否定 not .... both (+複数名詞) 「どちら (の〈名詞>) も・・・というわけ ではない」 not ... all (+1) not every +単数名詞 「すべて(の〈名詞) が…というわけ either, neither, both, any, all は代名詞としても形容詞としても用いられるが, no と every は形容詞としてだけ用いられることに注意。 は「2色のど 否定は <not./ ●全否定3つ [3人]以上の場合 「すべてのペットの持ち込みを許可していない」という3つ以上のすべてを否定する全 否定なので,〈not … any + 名詞〉 と 〈no + 名詞> で文意を完成させる。 min before ●部分否定一3つ [3人] 以上の場合 「誰もが・・・ するわけではない」から、部分否定の③ Not all か④ Not everyone が正解 になる。 述語動詞が wants なので三人称単数の ④ Not everyone が正解。 every ... 「すべての・・・」は全体を構成するひとつひとつに注目する表現で, every のあとに C は単数名詞が続き、さらに 〈every +単数名詞〉 は単数扱いとなる。 everyone, everything も同様に単数扱いとなる。 733 ③ Not all は複数扱いになるので, Not all (people) want to go ... となる。 F ●全否定 2つ [2人] の場合 ではない」という両方を否定する全否定。2つの場合の 名詞) > か〈neither (+名詞)〉なので.④either が正解。

未解決 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

しっかり理解のところ 名詞 whom/which to do はないんですか? 名詞 前置詞 whom/which to do だけですか?

249 発展 Pets should not be given more food will gain too much weight. 1 which 3 than Section 075 250 発展 ② that ④ what (a) Mary needs a well-equipped office to work in. (b) Mary needs a well-equipped office ( )( ) to work. しっかり理解 | 011 名詞+前置詞+ whom/which to do olms i [terlas Nood 〈名詞+前置詞+ whom/which to do〉の表現は,以下のような変形で理解すればよい。 (例1) I am looking for a partner with whom to work. 「私は一緒に働くパートナーを探している」 I work with a partner. 「私はパートナーと一緒に働く」(文) ATO (例2) Wealth is just a means by which to enjoy life. 「富とは人生を楽しむための手段にすぎない」 → a partner with whom I work 「私が一緒に働くパートナー」(関係詞節) → a partner with whom to work 「一緒に働く (ための) パートナー」 * I work が to work に変わったと考える。 Section 076 251 is dou MAP 例外のない規則など存在しない。 You enjoy life by a means. 「あなたはある手段で人生を楽しむ」(文) → a means by which you enjoy life 「あなたが人生を楽しむ (ための)手段」(関係詞節 → a means by which to enjoy life 「人生を楽しむ(ための)手段」 * you enjoy life が to enjoy life に変わったと考える。 You should give this CD to ( ) wants it. 1 who ② whom ③ whoever 4 whomever 24 <東京家政学院

回答募集中 回答数: 0