学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

丸で囲った所モンタナ州以下より大きくない国土に、、でもよいのでしょうか? no bigger than 以下より大きくない。という意味ですよね?

比較表現 (81) no 次の英文の下線部を訳しなさい) With a population nearly half of the U.S.'s squeezed into an area no room left in its no bigger than Montana, Japan has virtually crowded cities. Developers have built towering skyscrapers and even artificial islands in the sea, but the space crunch keeps getting worse. mall as A is no bigger than B. という文を考えてみましょう。 法 この場合, no は big を否定し, 同時に 「差 (AがBより大きい, あるいは BがAより大きい)」を否定しているのです。図式化すると、以下のようになります。 [ no bigger than (関西学院大) no が差を否定するのは I am 3 years older than you. において, 3 years を「ゼロ」 つまり"no" にすると「差がない」のがわかりますね。ですから,以下のように,結 果的にAとBは差がなくて同じという意味になります。 A is no bigger than B. = A is as small as B. big を否定して, small の方向でということです。一般的な形でまとめてみましょう。 < no +比較級 + than> <as+反意語の原形+as> 詰め込まれている に 地域 ほどに 小さい と同じ モンタナ州 squeezed (into an area) no bigger than Montana,) P(通分) M では,第1文カンマまでを no bigger than に注目して検討しましょう。 の状態で 人口が およそ半分の 合衆国の (With a population (nearly half of the U.S.'s) ( 付帯状況)→ O M = as smalt as no blyger Than 以下切り焼くない 語句 population 人口 / squeeze O (into N) 「O を(Nの中へ) 押し込める」 / virtually ほとんど / the crunch 危機 / keep Ving 「Vし続ける」

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

(21)の答えが3になるのがなんでか少し分からないです…わかる方いますか??

(21) (22) (23) Any Change? Long ago, humans did not use money. Because they often could not produce everything that they needed, they traded some of their goods for goods made by others. Gradually, the goods that they exchanged were replaced by cash. For hundreds of years, metal coins and paper bills that can be exchanged for goods and services have been produced. Cash is convenient for many people because it is easy to carry. At the same time, though, it ( 21 ). Another disadvantage is that criminals have been able to produce fake coins and bills. In the middle of the 20th century, plastic credit cards were introduced. They had security features to prevent them from being used by anyone except their owners. At first, their use was limited to wealthy people. Over time, however, they became ( 22 ). In the last few years, apps for smartphones that can be used in the same way as credit cards have also become popular. Because of this, some people are suggesting that we may soon see the end of cash. Supporters of a "cashless" society in which all payments are made electronically argue that it would have several benefits. For example, people would not have to worry about keeping their wallets safe. However, some people are concerned that they might be unable to pay for the things they need because of a software error or a broken smartphone. Moreover, some people do not have bank accounts or credit cards, so their only option is to use coins and bills. ( 23 ), it seems as though societies will continue to use cash. 1 can be lost or stolen can be recycled 1 thinner and lighter 3 harder to use 1 For now 2 Until then 2 4 2 4 3 is used for shopping online is understood by almost everyone more colorful and exciting more widely available With luck 4 By contrast

解決済み 回答数: 1