学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

なぜここにaが入るのか教えてください!

Littering in this facility is subject to a maximum fine of $500. どの a litter (...) itar (リタあ)] 動(.. )ゴミを投げ捨てる 《DO NOT LITTER 「ポイ捨て禁 (アメリカの至る所で見られる表示。 清涼飲料水の缶にも 書いてある)》 《liter [li:tar (リータ)] (リットル (単位))》 D e or facility (ファスィリティ)] • ロー名 U (空き缶 紙くずなどの) 投げ捨てられたゴミ 名 ①C 施設, 設備 ② SF (生まれながらの) 適性, 才能(natural ability/aptitude) 【特定の用途に適したもの】 □ facilitate... 動 F... を容易にする (make... easier) abe subject ①を受ける場合がある②... を受ける必要がある...は sibdzikt(サブジクトゥ)] 動詞ではなく(動) 名詞。 ◇ ALL BAGS ARE SUBJECT [is] TO SEARCH (すべての手荷物はチェックを受けます) 〔空 港の手荷物検査所の標示] ≫ maximum 形 最大 [最高] の (highest/top/utmost)( minimum/ lowest 最小 [最低]の) nakamam (マクスマム) ] ☐ 名 S 最大 最高 ( minimum 最小 [最低]) fine? ain(ファイン)] ( <和口 公 名 罰金 <fine' No.1010) 【fin (FINish) → 決着させる(お金)】 □ get a fine 動 罰金を取られる fine... 動... (違反者)に罰金を科す この施設内でのゴミの投げ捨てには,最高500ドルの罰金 が科せられることがあります。

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

(2)の、They have easier to access.のhaveはここではなんの働きをしているのですか?

Lesson Our Lost Friend ➤ p.150 Vocabulary discuss~L/B) ~を話し合う The British Museum welcomed the delegation/ and discussed their proposal In the end, / the museum offered to let Hoa Hakananai'a return, / but only as a 2 loan. // They refused to give it back permanently. // The museum did not deny / that the moai had been taken without the islanders` permission, / so why didn't they immediately agree to return it? // From the point of view of the museum, / there are good reasons to keep the statue. // the security and controlled Since Easter Island does not have ② environmental conditions that the British Museum has, the statue is safer in London. // The statue can now be seen by many more people than on a remote island. // Scholars have easier access to the statue. // Moreover, some people argue / that the moai deserves to be a world heritage object. // 5 These reasons make sense. // However, the fact remains / that Hon Hakananai'a was taken without permission and is still held against the people's will. // So, many people / -not only the Rapa Nui- / question the museum's reasoning. // proposal lóan dený point of view good reasons. 貸与物 を否定する ~を Section 3 正当な理由 Reading Points 以下のことを考えながら読んでみよう。 it back colo (2) 大英博物館が所有を主張する根拠に 多いのは、どのような事実があるからですか、 6 scholar access □argue動~だと主張する héritage object make sense (0) (167 words) their prom h the en offer to that 12 ★G-2 6 son des Will K €

未解決 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

至急!!私立大学看護学部の過去問です。答えがないため、回答を作って欲しいです!!科目は英語です。

問題番号に対応 効とする。 うち受験票お researchers at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna, Austria, have found. Dogs won't give food to a human, even if that person gave them some food first, and that they would help other dogs that had helped them before. Therefore, the team Previous studies have shown that dogs can recognize cooperative and uncooperative humans, "reciprocal altruism"- that is, doing a good thing in return to a human who had given expected to find that their test subjects would put these two things together and show To start, the team trained a group of 37 dogs to press a button which would activate a them food first. *enclosure with the dispenser, while one of (2) two humans was in a separate enclosure with the button. One would press the button to food dispenser. Then, they put each dog in an would not. Each dog was paired with both humans in give food to the dog, and (4) unhelpful one. turn. After that, the researchers switched over the button and the dispenser. They expected that the dogs would press the button to give food to the helpful human but not to the though the dogs did press the button, they did it just as often when either human had the food dispenser, and even when no human was there at all. "In these kinds of studies (5) [perform / to / dogs / which/ trained / are in a particular behavior for an experiment, they will usually do the behavior a few times as they have simply learned the association between the behavior and getting a reward, and it may be enjoyable for them to do the behavior," said Jim McGetrick, a PhD student at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna who led the research. 身を正しく が本冊子 1番 2 次の英文を読んで下の設問に答えなさい。 (3) giving us some food? Are they a combination of reasons. "It is (6) Why wouldn't our best pals want to help us out by secretly all bad boys and girls? McGetrick believes there is possible that the dogs did not understand enough about the task to realize that only one of the humans was providing them with food," he said. It could also be because they didn't fully understand the button and dispenser system, or because they were too focused on the food to notice whether a particular human was pressing the button or not. "Having said all that, even if they did completely understand the task and were fully attentive to the actions of the humans, there is still a good possibility that they wouldn't have given food back in return," he added. "It could be that providing food to a dog as they do not typically do that in everyday life." After all, humans are the ones who human is something very strange for (7) already have food, from a dog's perspective. why would your pet need to worry about (8) making sure you have enough? However, all the humans in the study were people the dogs didn't know. "It is quite 5

回答募集中 回答数: 0