学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

英文がわからないです心の優しい方、英文の解き方を教えて欲しいです🙇‍♀️

35 15 20 signatures in business. However, no one used fingerprints in crime work until the late In ancient times, people used fingerprints to identify people. They also used them as 1880s. Three men, working in three different areas of the world, made this possible. (1) The first man who collected a large number of fingerprints was William Herschel. He worked for the British government in India. He took fingerprints when people (7) official papers. For many years, he collected the same people's fingerprints several times. He made an important discovery. Fingerprints do not change over time. At about the same time, a Scottish doctor in Japan began to study fingerprints. Henry Faulds was looking at ancient Japanese pottery* one day when he noticed small It occurred to him that the lines were 2,000-year-old fingerprints. Faulds wondered, "Are fingerprints unique to each person?" He began to take fingerprints of all his friends, co-workers, and students at his medical school. Each print was (). He also wondered, "Can you change your fingerprints?” shaved the fingerprints off his fingers with a razor to find out. Would they grow back lines on the pots. (2) He the same? They did. One day, there was a theft in Faulds's medical school. Some alcohol was missing. Faulds found fingerprints on the bottle. He compared the fingerprints to the ones in his records, and he found a match. The thief was one of his medical students. By examining fingerprints, Faulds solved the crime. Both Herschel and Faulds collected fingerprints, but there was a problem. It was very difficult to use their collections to identify a specific fingerprint. Francis Galton in England made it easier. He noticed common patterns in fingerprints. He used these to help classify fingerprints. These features, called "Galton details," made it easier for police to search through fingerprint records. The system is still in use today. When 25 police find a fingerprint, they look at the Galton details. Then they search for other fingerprints with similar features. (4) Like Faulds, Galton believed that each person had a unique fingerprint. According to Galton, the chance of two people with the same fingerprint was 1 in 64 billion. Even the fingerprints of identical twins are ( ). Fingerprints were the perfect tool to 30 identify criminals. For mo than 100 years, no one found two people with the same prints. Then, in 2004, terrorists (I) a crime in Madrid, Spain. Police in Madrid found a fingerprint. They used computers to search databases of fingerprint records all over the world. Three fingerprint experts agreed that a man on the West Coast of the United States was one of the criminals. Police arrested him, but the experts were wrong. The man was innocent. Another man was (). Amazingly, the two men who were 6,000 5 10 136 Lesson 日本大学 470 words 22 (3) 23 024 25 26

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

全文訳お願いします!

4 20 科学 420 words Chapter 1 The recipe for making any creature is written in its DNA. So last year, when 1-1 geneticists* published the near-complete DNA sequence of the long-extinct woolly mammoth, there was much speculation about whether we could bring this giant creature back to life. 5 東京理科大学 Creating a living, breathing creature from a genome* sequence that exists only in a computer's memory is not possible right now. But someone someday is sure to try it, predicts Stephan Schuster, a molecular biologist at Pennsylvania State University and a driving force behind the mammoth genome project. So besides the mammoth, what other extinct beasts might we bring back to life? Well, 12 10 it is only going to be possible with creatures for which we can recover a complete genome Without one, there is no chance. And usually when a creature dies, the (1) - DNA in any flesh left untouched is soon destroyed as it is attacked by sunshine and bacteria. sequence. There are, however, some circumstances in which DNA can be preserved. If your 15 specimen froze to death in an icy wasteland such as Siberia, or died in a dark cave or a really dry region, for instance, then the probability of finding some intact stretches of DNA is much higher. Even in ideal conditions, though, no genetic information is likely to survive more than a million years. - so dinosaurs are out and only much younger remains are likely to yield good-quality DNA. "It's really only worth studying specimens that are less than 100,000 years old," says Schuster. The genomes of several extinct species besides the mammoth are already being sequenced, but turning these into living creatures will not be easy. "It's hard to say that something will never ever be possible," says Svante Pääbo of the Max Planck Institute 25 for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany, "but it would require technologies so far removed from what we currently have that I cannot imagine how it would be done." But then (3) 50 years ago, who would have believed we would now be able to read the instructions for making humans, fix inherited diseases, clone mammals and be close to creating artificial life? Assuming that we will develop the necessary technology, we have 30 selected ten extinct creatures that might one day be resurrected. Our choice is based not just on practicality, but also on each animal's "charisma" - just how exciting the prospect of resurrecting these animals is. 1-3

回答募集中 回答数: 0