答えがないので答え合わせをお願いします

(61) ou must visit Kyoto. You can see a lot of national treasures there. (61) You must visit Kyoto which you can see a lot of [L] 日本語の意味に合うように, 英文を完成させなさい。 national treasures. (62) A:Oh, This is book which I want (この本は私が読みたかったものだ) To read B: You can have it if you want. I don't need it anymore. [M] ( )に入る語を [ ] から選びなさい。 ただし, それぞれ1回しか使えませ ん。 (63) (1) The park ( ) we can play soccer is near the library. ) I can get to the station from here. (2) I want to know ( (3) I don't understand ( (4) There was the time ( [how/when/where / why] ) he went there alone. ) I was very shy. (63) where hav why when

If I had enough time,I would play with my dog until he got tired.という文でgetがgotになるのはなぜですか？

並び順を教えてください🙏

John will be late for the first game, so we'll just (7 do have make I to with) ten players.

仮定法についての問題を解いてみました！ 明日授業があるので間違っていたら 教えて欲しいです🙏💧‬ 問題多くて申し訳ないです🙇‍♀️ よろしくお願いします！

EXERCISES 1 日本語の意味に合うように,( 内に適切な語を入れなさい。 過去 haveをつける! (1) もし 10分早く家を出ていたら、彼女は学校に遅刻しなかっただろうに。 0 A if she had left home ten minutes earlier, she (wouldnt) (have )( been) late for school. ooter ni smit ng nucza (2) もしそのとき病気でなかったら、私は彼らと一緒に釣りに行っていたかもしれない。 If I (had) been sick then, I (might) (have gone fishing with them. (3) もし彼が本当のことを知ったら悲しむだろう。 If he(knew ) the truth, he (would be sad. (4) もし私たちがこの鍵を持っていなかったら、ここから出られないだろう。 If we (didn't) (hase) the key, we couldn't) get out of here. 2 下線部の表現に注意して、 次の英文を日本語にしなさい。 (1) If you hadn't decided to study abroad, what would you do now? might) (could, would 助動詞の後は 必ず動詞の原形 haveがない 原形 haveがある →過去分詞 もし留学することを決めていなかったら、今何をしていただろうか。 (2) If my father hadn't met my mother then, he wouldn't get married with anyone. もし父がそのとき母に出会っていなかったら、誰とも結婚しなかっただろう。 3 日本語の意味に合うように,[ ]内の語句を並べかえなさい。 rathe (1) あなたのアドバイスがなかったら、私は試験に合格できていなかっただろう。 [ without / advice / your ], I couldn't have passed the exam. ......Without.. ...your.. advice I couldn't have passed the exam. 現在の 事実とは もし音楽がなかったなら、世界はつまらない場所になるだろう。現 were / for/t / not /if/music ], the world would be a dull place. If it 事異 I were not for music! 異なる (3) もしお金の問題がなかったら、彼は家を売らなかっただろう。 the world would be a dull place. 過去 [ if the money problem/had/been/it/for/not ], he wouldn't have sold the house. の事実” If it had not been for the money, he wouldn't have sold the house. とは異なる problem 4 英文の意味が通るように, ( 内から適切な語句を選びなさい。 ABC (1) If we had had a map, we (didn't get / wouldn't get wouldn't have gotten) lost. (2) She would have felt lonely if it (were not / had not been) for her friends. (3) If I (had / had had) breakfast, I wouldn't be so hungry and tired now. (4) (With/Without) air, all living creatures would die. (5) If it (isn't weren't / hadn't been) raining, we would play baseball. (6) If it (were not / had not been) for the pain of his back, he could be able to go to work. (1)もし地図を持っていたら、道に迷わなかっただろう。 (2)もし友達がいなかったら、彼女は寂しく感じていただろう。→過去の (3)もし朝ご飯を食べていたら、今こんなにお腹がすいたり疲れたりしてないだろう。 (4) 空気がなければ、すべての生き物は死んでしまうだろう。 + (5) もし雨が降っていなければ、私たちは野球をするのに。 (6)もし彼の腰の痛みがなければ、彼は仕事に行けるのに、現在の事実とは異なってい

赤線は本文の何をさしてますか？？

In 2020 people celebrated the 50th anniversary of Doraemon's debut. This robot cat has been loved not only by Japanese people but also by many people all over the world. He was appointed Japan's anime ambassador in 2008 because he had been playing an important role in promoting Japanese anime culture. Although Doraemon is an imaginary robot, Japan is proud of its real robots. In fact the country has led the world in the development of robotic technology for decades. It is the technology used to develop industrial robots for manufacturing. Japan has exported a large number of such robots all over the world. Japan is also famous for developing unique humanoid robots such as ASIMO and Pepper. Both robots stand upright but ASIMO can walk on two feet while Pepper can read emotions.

誤りが含まれる下線部がどれか教えていただけるとうれしいです。よろしくお願いします。

Ronald always thought of himself as the best soccer player in the region, and he (a) will participate a trial. (b) (c) (d)

誤りが含まれる下線部がどれか教えていただけるとうれしいです。よろしくお願いします。

As the show is delayed in starting, please remain to seat for a couple of minutes. (a) (d) (b)

この文で（1）になぜinがはいるのですか？私はonだと思いました。 onを選んだ理由は、歴史の上にあるって思ったからです。

There are 1.42 million lakes in the world, and 62% of them are in Canada. Along with these many lakes are thousands of rivers. Today, 70% of North America's large rivers without dams are in Canada. In short, (A) Canada is covered by a lot of water. If you think about how much water there is in Canada, it is not surprising that a small boat, called a canoe, a big role ( 1 ) the history and development of the has played a big role country. 19~ 1980 role small boat with an open top that can move quickly and (B)-

英語がおかしくないか見てほしいです！ よろしくお願いします🙇‍♀️

My family holds a Christmas party every year. This year I had chicken and cake. Santa didn't come so I got a present from my parents. After Christmas comes New Year's. I spent New Year's at my grandma's house. We play games, watch TV and relax together. Of course I don't study. So, I finish my homework early.

問4の⑤の計算はどうすれば合うのですか。 教えてください🙇‍♀️ 3枚目が答えです。

次の英文を読んで,下の設問に答えなさい。 Last year, 4.2 million babies died. That is the most recent number reported by UNICEF of deaths before the age of one, worldwide. We often see lonely and emotionally charged numbers like this in the news or in the materials of activist groups or organizations. They produce a reaction. Who can even imagine 4.2 million dead babies? It is so terrible, and even worse when we know that almost all died from easily preventable diseases. And how can anyone argue that 4.2 million is anything other than a huge number? You might think that nobody would even try to argue (that, but you would be wrong. That is exactly why I mentioned this number. Because it is not huge: it is beautifully small. If we even start to think about how tragic each of these deaths is for the parents who had waited for their newborn to smile, and walk, and play, and instead had to bury their baby, then this number could keep us crying for a long time. But who would be helped by these tears? Instead let's think clearly about human suffering. The number 4.2 million is for 2016. The year before, the number was 4.4 million. The year before that, it was 4.5 million. Back in 1950, it was 14.4 million. That's almost 10 million more dead babies per year, compared with today. Suddenly this terrible number starts to look smaller. In fact (2)the number has never been lower. Of course, I am the first person to wish the number was even lower and falling even faster. But to know how to act, and how to prioritize resources, nothing can be more important than doing the cool-headed math and realizing what works and what doesn't. And this is clear: more and more deaths are being prevented. comparing the numbers. (3). We would never realize that without