学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

わかりません

Step 2 1 次の各文の 1. Tom |内に入れるのに最も適当なものを、一つずつ選びなさい。 be living in London now; he moved to Tokyo two months ago. ② would 3 can 4 cannot (愛知工大) ① ought to 2. After a lot of practice he was ① able ② easy 3. Under the circumstances it ① might to understand spoken English. 3 good ④ possible ought 4. I promised that I would lose weight, so I ① don't have to ② must ③ have You must not ③ No, you have to 7. Miki and her family no answer. ① could go be best to wait for a few weeks. needed ④ seemed 5. The room is full of gas, so you ① didn't ② needn't 6. A: Do I have to finish this work today? B: must be strike a match. ③ couldn't ③ should go eat snacks between meals. ④ mustn't ④ mustn't (センター試験) would be ② No, you may not ④ No, you don't have to lout of town. I have called several times, but there is (東京経大) 10. 彼女は長い間歩いておなかがすいているにちがいない。 She (be / after/ hungry/must/ walking) for a long time. (芝浦工大) (日本大) Notes, 8. performance 「演技,芸当 」 3. under the circumstances 「そういう状況では」 9. unlike ... 9. in time 「間に合って (治療が可能な段階で)」 「…..と違って」 (近畿大) 2 ► ( 内に与えられた語句を並べかえて文を完成させなさい。 8. Monkeys learn tricks (give great performances / they will / that / be able to / so easily) in a short time. (名古屋工大) (南山大) 9. 他の病気とは異なり,ガンは適時に適切な手当てをしても治るとは限らない。 Unlike other (be/by/cancer / cured / diseases / may / not / proper) treatment in time. (金沢工大 ) Par 1 ( 大阪学院大 ) 文法編 7

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

3枚目の問いの答えを教えてください。 よろしくお願い致します。

Radio Host: durlar aind Roger Ali: Radio Host: Roger Ali: Radio Host: Roger Ali: Radio Host: Roger Ali: Roger Ali: Radio Host: Roger Ali: Radio Host: Welcome back. As I mentioned before the break, Roger Ali is with us today to talk about artificial intelligence. Thank you for being here, Dr. Ali. Thank you for having me. I'll be honest with you. When I hear the words "artificial intelligence," the first thing I think of is the character HAL from the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey. ch tud goons bad Radio Host:ome In other words, the search engine draws conclusions about what we're looking for on the Internet. Roger Ali: Sure. Many people remember HAL. In the movie, he's the computer that controls the systems of a spacecraft. He also speaks with the people on the spacecraft. And he's not very happy when the people decide to turn off the computer. In the movie, HAL becomes very dangerous. That's right, but fortunately, artificial intelligence in the real world isn't like HAL. Well, that's good! Can you tell us what is happening in the field of AI? Many interesting things. For example, when we search for something on the Internet, the search results that we see are chosen carefully. The search engine has learned which websites are the most popular, the most reliable, and so on. This prevents us from seeing a lot of websites we're not really interested in. Tosa Right, so it only shows us the information it thinks we want to see, which includes go advertisements as well. We usually see only ads for products that the computer thinks we might want to buy. You said, "It thinks," but is the search engine really thinking? IST That depends on your definition of thinking. The search engine is capable of learning machine learning-and it does have knowledge. Knowledge about the Internet. Are learning and knowledge part of your definition of thinking? They're part of it, but human beings are capable of so much more. We have our senses hearing, smell, sight, touch, taste-and our emotions. We notice a lot about the world, and we use our judgment to make decisions. That's true, and most computer scientists know that we can't replace human beings with computers. We don't intend to make robots for every kind of job, either. That's just not practical.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

解説読んでも全然ピンとこないです。解説お願いします。全文お願いします。

英文分析 1. [only + 副詞 (句・節)〕 + 疑問文の形式の倒置形 文の形の倒置形でしたね。 本文も, not only で始まっていますから、 後ろが does it only は否定的な意味を持つ副詞で, 〔only + 副詞 (句・節)〕で始まれば後ろが疑問 provide という疑問文の形式の倒置になっています。 また、本文では [not only A but B) の熟語が使われていますが, but Bがずいぶん と後ろにありますから見落とさないようにしてください。 2. 仮定法らしき文の中に疑問文の形がでてきたらifの省略の合図 本文では S provide no substitutes までがSVOの一つの完全な文なのに、突然 should が出てきます。 そこでifの省略を予測できたかどうかがポイントです。(if S should V〕の倒置は他の倒置より難しい場合があります。というのは普通の仮定法と は違い主節には次のように様々な形を取りうるからです。 If S+should+V, + 直説法 : S will V / Scan V / S may V / SV * 「直説法」・・・あることを事実として述べるときの動詞の形。 +仮定法 : Swould / could/might V + 命令文 : V 本文では, if a mother or father should be unable to care for his or her child の if が省略されて倒置になっています。 また,主節に直説法の文が置かれていて, おまけに 助動詞が入っていませんから、難しく感じたかもしれません。 3. could/would / might は,形は過去形でも意味は現在 本文最後の箇所に突然 could が登場します。 これは 「can の弱め」として使われてい ます。 if節のない仮定法と考えてもOKです。 つまり「よい環境に無かったので結束 していなかったが、もしよりよい環境ならば、おそらく結束していただろう」という意 味です。 つまり in better circumstances が if節の代わりになっていると考えればいい わけです。 このようにif節のない仮定法はよく出てきますが、ほとんどの場合,主語 か副詞 (句)がif節の代わりになっていますので覚えておいてください。

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

全文訳お願いします!

4 20 科学 420 words Chapter 1 The recipe for making any creature is written in its DNA. So last year, when 1-1 geneticists* published the near-complete DNA sequence of the long-extinct woolly mammoth, there was much speculation about whether we could bring this giant creature back to life. 5 東京理科大学 Creating a living, breathing creature from a genome* sequence that exists only in a computer's memory is not possible right now. But someone someday is sure to try it, predicts Stephan Schuster, a molecular biologist at Pennsylvania State University and a driving force behind the mammoth genome project. So besides the mammoth, what other extinct beasts might we bring back to life? Well, 12 10 it is only going to be possible with creatures for which we can recover a complete genome Without one, there is no chance. And usually when a creature dies, the (1) - DNA in any flesh left untouched is soon destroyed as it is attacked by sunshine and bacteria. sequence. There are, however, some circumstances in which DNA can be preserved. If your 15 specimen froze to death in an icy wasteland such as Siberia, or died in a dark cave or a really dry region, for instance, then the probability of finding some intact stretches of DNA is much higher. Even in ideal conditions, though, no genetic information is likely to survive more than a million years. - so dinosaurs are out and only much younger remains are likely to yield good-quality DNA. "It's really only worth studying specimens that are less than 100,000 years old," says Schuster. The genomes of several extinct species besides the mammoth are already being sequenced, but turning these into living creatures will not be easy. "It's hard to say that something will never ever be possible," says Svante Pääbo of the Max Planck Institute 25 for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany, "but it would require technologies so far removed from what we currently have that I cannot imagine how it would be done." But then (3) 50 years ago, who would have believed we would now be able to read the instructions for making humans, fix inherited diseases, clone mammals and be close to creating artificial life? Assuming that we will develop the necessary technology, we have 30 selected ten extinct creatures that might one day be resurrected. Our choice is based not just on practicality, but also on each animal's "charisma" - just how exciting the prospect of resurrecting these animals is. 1-3

回答募集中 回答数: 0
1/2