学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

訳してください。

SSTOYS ) swould 【oould7 might] V (原形) .、 らぅ…なのに」 If S' V' (過去形) ご・ 語 「もしこなら…なのに」 IS も の拉ぐな気持おき天す 、 六現在の事実と癌うことを全定して、話者の様々なきい K さき の に: 9 GSG G は ひ 1 ImOrG touriStS from Brazil、 FI spoke P well aS English、 Tc uld guide + * で "OrtuSu SS 8S 、 5 SS 1 N SC < On FTwere you、1 would_chooSe Spamish as a SC かI 節中の動詞が be 動詞の場合は、主語が単数でも遂例 WerS が用いられる 「こならいいのに」 1 wish S' V' (過去形) で rwish were biingual in Italian and Japeno 8 ri は ン But for ~ た表3 「もるしこがなければ』」 ff it were not for ~ [Without こ/ But for て ] xButfo っAa もをL誠きゃ WS のNSReJ 1 は ts 大書かなけはばいミミ でうさ も は き穫できざぶひひてても炊 difRcult、 Fit wwere not for dictionaries, learning 8 1angua8e would_be Very 回 「てなら…でしょう」ぐ would V (原形) ..、、* could.misht も用いられる Ernie is from Montreal, so he would be very helpful in puttimg thiS paSsage into SS 3, 9 「もし万-こならば」 If S' should [were to] V' (原形) ご were to の方がより実更性の有しい電 you should visit Egypt what language would you speak there? 可能性は低いがありえると思う場合は、would よりも wil を用いることがある ITwere to get a chance to study at collese again、1would like to 1earn Swahili | 詞「てこしていただけますか」 1 wonder if You Could V' (原形) て xx本吾な罰をきす T wonder iぜyou could be my Spanish interpreter、 「まるでこのように」 as if S' V' (過去形) < Kim speaks Thai as iFshe were from Thailand、 5 上還 「そろそろこしていい頃だけど」 It's (about) tme S' V (通形) 尼's about Gime you got down to studying 、 0 Chmese 実行していないととをせきたてる に 気持ちを表す、 TS (sbout tme foryouto gat * own to studying chinese は [。

未解決 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

長文どなたか教えてほしいです。 不安なんで…

ロ には 唱】 火のスピーチ放入を読んで、下紀の癌に和えなさい。 なおの人た家 本文の後に注があります。 As an old science reporter Tnd myselfin a diHfenlt position todai 0 Tighrtech executives on the topic of artifcial inteligence or AI Fnn surecoll 際。 far more about AI than 1 do. Stil. 1 think I can contribute some historical perspectHVe. Thave been writing science columns since many cf you were kids ( Z ) Hmrote my frst column on AT back in 1963。 Tm( イ ) because when T say *artifcial intelhgence"Tm talking about something that Tm not sure really exists. Those of you who have read my articlealand books on the subject know that Tbehieve in what we call imealk AT' and that 1 aminotieal onvineed by what we call srongALy oto Whats the difference? Lets say we program a computer to say Rhank youl in situations where real people would feel grateful. 1 think we could make eally sound like a thankful person。 Tm sure that such a machine and tuned so well that it could fool me were blindfolded But here's the question: Did the program actually feel thankf me? Or did the team who wrote the program thank me? Was According to the strong AL approach, the computer really couldibe ex According to weak AI, iCs just a machine making sounds。 Tim reminded of an old classic comedyy routine imagined a future world in which computers made 。 people really worried about that in the 1960s. In this ima handled every decision that humans didmt like making. One fmring other computers. So the comedy routine consists of a conm ose computer ecplaine to worker computer why itmust be fred The reason this comedy routine is interesting js not just bec because it expresses fears about strong AI。 ICs int 50 years ago- That's right。 a halfrcentury ago。 people uman decisions.They thoughtit might happ8mi the future.( ウ ).the predicted robotdominant、 Im my opinion, no matter how impressed none of us realiy believes that truly selfraware di exist. Tknow youre ll experts on AI but ileEs rogram, no matter how sophisticeted,( 王 ) marmyi jn or reject God. or say “Tlove you and mean it W cperatipg the machine-or who wrote the Dio As a real. thinking person who has obaerved tk research for many yearsu Tbelieve there will alaya bela efieve that no matter how sophisticated ATbeoon as a thinking person。T also know that 1 can be wi the future of science. Perhaps momeday those of yo

未解決 回答数: 1
1/2