学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

of stoneの修飾先がなぜここなの? 石で作った、ではなく石で作られた墓、としてはダメですか? どっちでもいいっぽいです。ありがとうございました☺️

のは副詞の働き。 To から Egyptまでの M は, 述部を中心に修飾しています。 この トうに,前置詞向には, 動詞,形容詞,副詞,文のいずれかを修飾する副詞の働きを するものがあります。 第2文の(after death) は直前の life を修飾していますから, ①と同様,修飾語とし ての形容詞の働きをしています。 y 89 antgno yartt 2ot boton .bool nt 後の 死んだ しかしながら であった 永遠(の) 生命は Life(after death), however, was eternal. S M (副) Vi C 意訳すれば,life on earth は「現世」, life after death は「来世」と言えるでしょう。 第3文の前置詞向の働きを見てみましょう。 一格 ife それゆえに 彼らは を造った 彼らの く 墓 で 石 Therefore they built their tombs(of stone) (副) いい S Vt O M こ。 彼らは を持っていった 彼らの 所有物 た and they took their possessions 句 (等) S Vt O の身につけて 彼ら (with them)(into another world). へ あの 世 lO M M ここでの前置詞句はいずれも述語動詞を修飾しています。 ②の副詞の働きです。 副 詞的な修飾はけっこう複雑ですから, まずは名詞を後ろから修飾するのか, そうでな いかを判断することが先決です。 〈全文訳〉古代エジプト人にとっては,現世は短いが、来世は永遠のものであっ た。それゆえ,彼らは石で自分たちの墓を造り、 所有物をあの世へと持ってい ったのである。 (解説·解答→別冊: p.9) 演習 16 次の英文の下線部を訳しなさい。 Much has been written in the past few years about the bond between ま 動 people and their pets. Pets help keep us young: they decrease loneliness, and (同志社女子短大) tey give us the opportunity tolbe needed. 関:語句 bond 固/ between A and B 「A とBの間(で, の,に)」/ decrease VI を減らす/loneliness 固寂しさ きずな 33 SとVを発見する技術文の主要素をつかむ技術 関係調節の把握 共通関係の把握 の見抜き方方 埋SPの発見 副詞的 の0 that の把握 塗動詞のSP関係の把握

未解決 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

進研模試高1過去問で質問があります🙏 この問いはグレーで引いているところから答えを導き出すと思うんですが…考え方を誤っていますか?教えてください!

【必答同題) 6次の英文を読んで、あとの問いに答えよ。(配点 22) Can you die from a cultural difference ? That is the question that a filmmaker wanted to ex lore. So she made a movie about the true story of a doctor, his patient, and their two very different cultures. The doctor in the movie is an American. The patient in the movie is from Afghanistan. In 1988, this Afghan man came to the United States with his wife and ten children. In 2000, he started to feel sick. When he went to the hospital, the doctors found a serious problem. He had stomach cancer. He needed an operation. After he had the operation, he felt much better. So when his doctor told him he needed more treatment, he said no. But did he understand his American doctor ? Did his doetor understand him? Was the patient's life in danger because he and his doctor were from different cultures ? (1 That is what the filmmaker wanted to find out. Religion was, one difference between the patient and the doctor in the movie. The patient refused the treatment for religious reasons. However, according to the movie, the doctor didn't ask him why his religion did not allow itt That was-a big mistake. Actually, the patient's religion does allow tke treatment, The problem was how the doctor planned ta give him the medicine, through a needle in his arm /There were other ways to give the medicine, for example in a *pill. But the doctor never told him that, Why not ? The doctor thought that the medicine was the problem. Another difference was language. The patient did not speak English, but his daughters did. The doctor thought that the daughters told their father everything. But they didn't, They never told him he had cancer. In the movie, a family friend explained that in Afghan culture he doctor does not speak to the patient directly. He speaks to the family. And often the family does not tell the patient the truth. Se did this patient know that he was dying ? It is not clear in the movie. The Afghan man died from cancer before the movie was finished. The filmmaker makes it very clear in the movie that the doctor gave the patient excellent medical care. She also makes it clear that the doctor respected and cared about his patient very much. But was the patient's life shorter because he and his doctor came from different cultures ? (2 ) That is why the filmmaker made the movie. She wants both patients and doctors

解決済み 回答数: 2