学年

質問の種類

数学 高校生

英語の長文ってどうやったら読めるようになりますか

1 次の英文を読んで、問 (1) ~ (5) に且本語で答えなさい。 Lobola is the African custom of paying fora bride. Although it is an old custom, not In fact, it is being debated in Botswana. everyone in African cultures is happy with it. Many people, including many women, support payment of lobola. They explain that in Tswana culture, a marriage means joining a family, not just marrying an individual. The idea of marrying into a family is very African. just the man.Through marriage, the young woman's family loses their daughter as she then becomes a part of her husband's family. Lobola is a way to show thanks. It is a form of generosity in African culture. In its traditional form, they also explain, the groom's family gave cattle to the bride's family. But it didn't matter whether the family owned cattle or not. A woman does not get married to A man only had to pay what he could afford if he had no cattle, he could give something else, even the smallest form of payment. The tradition of lobola was a matter of pride. Today, lobola is often given in cash. purchase of a bride. Lobola is meant to join two families together. They know that But its supporters say it is not about the some people abuse the custom. But they believe that the tradition should not be tossed out because it has many positive effects. Rather than get rid of it, many believe it should just be explained better. However, many others say this custom should be stopped. They think it has become commercialized. Families make lots of demands on the groom. They think this makes lobola look very bad. They argue that in Africa's past, a girl was an asset at home. and other household chores. She did the cooking When a family lost that child through marriage, it demanded payment. Today, they think that lobola has changed into a useless tradition. In this custom, a man is buying the right to control a woman. They say women are individuals with rights. In today's world, parents do not have to be paid for a bride because their male and female children are equal. They all work and make contributions to the household. They believe that paying lobola makes it seem like a man is buying a pair of shoes or a bicycle, instead of getting married. They also argue that it is often a financial burden for couples. It is too difficult for many people to pay the price asked. So, is lobola a rich tradition, bringing families together? Or is it an ugly custom of buying women? This debate continues in Botswana, as does the custom.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 中学生

【至急】 表の、理由/具体例 のところに入れる英文を教えてください! 私は賛成派意見です

本文の意味 の歩きスマホ:ありかなしか? のスマホでメッセージなどを打ちながら運転することはほとんどの場所で違法であるが、スマ ホをいじりながら歩くことはどうだろうか。 92017年、ハワイのホノルルでは、道路を横断するときにメッセージを送っていたり、い かなる電子機器であろうとそれに目を落としたりすることを禁止した。 のあなたはもっと多くの都市でこのような法律を作るべきだと思いますか。 名詞 ユース Step 2 次のテーマに対して、 賛成か反対かを決め、 それぞれの理由を A~D から選びましょう。 テーマ We need laws for electronic device use on the street. 回賛成 口反対 理由(A A Being safe is more important than texting. 安全でことはメッセーを送るより大切 B We can make our own decisions. 達、新じしんの考えで=決める C The police should work on more important things. Hいさっは、 もっと無代のことに取り<む D Making a law is the most effective way. な果町 E F ほかに考えられる理由があれば、 E、 F に書こう。 Step 3 自分の意見と理由を組み合わせて、投稿文を書きましょう。 書き終えたら、 下の例文を読んで参考になる表現を取り入れて修正しましょう。 例文 Introduction I do not think we need laws for electronic device use on the street. I 意見 havé two reasons. First, sometimes we really need to use those devices outside. Ifyou are looking ata map, it is bother to stop looking when you cross the street. Body · 理由 具体例 Second, we can make our own decisions. Bike accidents are common, but many people choose to ride them anyway. Conclusion We cannot ban everything. I do not think we need such a law. まとめ

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

共通テストの問題でこのタイプのリスニング問題の時にはじめに読む時間が与えられるのですが、その時間に何を確認しておいた方がいいとかありますか?

D間対応) 問1(a) ワークシートの空欄 にあてはめるのに最も適切なものを,六 1 の講義を聞き,それぞれの問いの答えとして最も適切なものを,選択肢のうちから つの選択肢(O~6)のうちから一つ選びなさい。 びなさい。状況と問いを読む時間(約 60 秒) が与えられた後,音声が流れます。 司流します。(20 点) OT20-0 0 a raise of around $7 2 alowering of around $7 a raise of around $8 の a lowering of around $8 状況 a raise of around $15 a lowering of around $15 あなたはアメリカの大学で, 賃金と生産性の関わりについて, ワークシート にメモを取りながら,講義を聞いています。 Shoer r 問1(b) ワークシートの表の空欄 2 7 にあてはめるのに最も 適切なものを,四つの選択肢 )のうちから一つずつ選びなさい。 ワークシート O The relationship between wages and productivity OT20-2 選択肢は2回以上使ってもかまいません。 は2回 Example of one American company's wage change: 0 higher 3 の benefit lower cost Now: Overall result: Wage change 問1 (c) 講義の内容と一致するものはどれか。最も適切なものを, 四つの週 1 Future: 肢(O-)のうちから一つ選びなさい。 8 O Benefits and costs for companies 0 Stronger labor laws are forcing companies to increase wages. Effect on company: Change: O higher or Employees By downsizing, companies can afford to pay skilled workers more. lower | cost or 4) benefit 3 Higher wages have a negative impact on productivity and profits. all 2 wage 3 の Productivity has increased greatly and wages have been increasing benefit higher motivation current 4 replacement Bral 5 effort 7 6 worker skill future

未解決 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

回答募集中 回答数: 0