学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

1の〔c]がなぜconnectingがだめなんですか?

き,次 2 次の対話を読み, あとに続く問いに答えなさい。 Miho Bob : I heard Ken got [a]. What happened? (3) stay 4 keep : Well, during the soccer practice, he fell down and [b] his leg badly. He's had an operation, but he has to stay in a hospital for ten days. Miho : That's too bad. Why don't we go to the hospital just to say 'Hi'? That will help him feel better. Bob Good idea. ①きっと彼は病院で何もすることがないだろうね。Kazuki, ②君のマンガをいくつ か持って行ったら? Kazuki: Sure. Also, I think it's important for him to feel [ c ] with us. I don't want him to feel lonely. Miho That's right. We should send him daily video messages. ③( would, tell, news, be, about, him, class, to, fun, the ) ! Kazuki OK, I'll ask all of the students in our class to prepare their messages. This is going to make him feel good. RE. 編 内から選び、 適切な形にして書きなさい。 同じ語は1度しか使えない。 breconnected injure / connect / break から 1 1. [a]~[c] に入る語を injured hal injured in broke broke 2. 下線部①,②の日本語を英語にしなさい。 • 16 connecting I'm sure he has nothing to do in the hospital why don't you bring some of your mange? )内の語を並べかえて、意味の通る文にしなさい。 ただし, 文頭にくる語も小文 3. 下線部③の ( 字にしてある。 To tell him news about the class would be tun. ! Lesson 9-41

未解決 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

most の後ろのof themは省略していいのですか?? また but most have never before been so deeply convinced of the importance of their work.この文の訳し方がよくわからなく読めません... 続きを読む

講義音声 17 40 比較 《否定語+ 現在完了 [仮定法] + 比較》 の as [than] now の省略 UNESCO employees have been long devoted 〈to increasing S V M₁ C 40/88 international cooperation (in the areas (of education, science, and M2 culture))〉, but most have never before been so deeply 接 S 助 M1 M2 V convinced 〈 of the importance (of their work)〉. M3 1. 比 + 仮 こと 例 るの い。 C 仮 ださ 日本語訳例 例 ※1 *2 国連教育科学文化機関の職員は,教育, 科学, 文化の分野で国際協力を拡大するこ ※4 ※3 ※3 *5 と に長い間尽力してきたが,職員の大半は,自らの仕事の重要性を今ほど深く確信 したことはかつてなかった。 *6 直訳 ※1 UNESCO の訳は 「ユネスコ」 でも可です。 ※2 ※3 employees の訳は 「従事している人々」 「従事者」は可ですが 「従業員」は不適切です。 さざ have been devoted to ~ の訳は 「〜に献身してきた」 「~に打ち込んできた」 「~に身 [時 間]を捧げてきた」 「〜に専心してきた」 「〜に専念してきた」 「~に力を注いできた」 などでも可 とします。 ただし, 「~に没頭してきた」 は不自然です。 ※4 increasing ~は「(協力)を増やすこと」 「~の増加」 は不自然です。 「(国際的な協力)を高 止めることは可です。 「~を加速させること」は誤訳です。 ※ 5 目には most は most of them (=the employees) なので 「職員の大半」 とします。 ※6文の後半はas now 「今ほど」 を補って訳してください。 so deeply の soは省略されている as now に呼応する so なので, 「それほど (深く~を確信した)」 と訳さないように注意してください。 して 本 thei と訳 2. W 「私 で 辞書 「疲

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

九州大学英語2019年の英作文の添削をお願いします🙇‍♀️ 大問4が要約と英作文、5が和文英訳です!🙇‍♀️🙇‍♀️🙇‍♀️

〔4〕 九州大-理系前期 Read the following newspaper article and follow the instructions below. (36) 16 2019年度 英語 in Engligi taul" According to the Kanagawa Prefectural Police Station, a 20-year-old female university student caused a traffic death. The student was riding on a power- She moved off from an assisted bicycle when the accident happened. intersection and started riding on the sidewalk. At that moment, a 77-year-old lady was walking on the sidewalk and moved toward the bicyclist. The student hit the lady. The collision caused the lady to fall and strike her head. She was transported to hospital, but died of her injuries two days later. At the time of the incident, the student was apparently holding a smartphone in her left hand and a drink in her right while steering the power- assisted bike. Moreover, she had an earphone in her left ear. Therefore, police arrested the student for breaking the new law and riding recklessly. Police are investigating whether the student noticed that the old lady was walking toward her. They suspect that she was not paying sufficient attention because she was operating her smartphone right up until the collision. Her court appearance date has not been decided yet. The Mainichi, December 16, 2017 Instructions: Write two well-developed paragraphs in English. In the first paragraph, summarize the main points of the newspaper article above in lo approximately 100 words. Use different vocabulary and sentence structure from the original passage as much as possible. In the second paragraph, write your opinion about what should be done to reduce accidents like this in approximately 50 words. hosidinlong unich lor, condadnoah

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

至急!!私立大学看護学部の過去問です。答えがないため、回答を作って欲しいです!!科目は英語です。

問題番号に対応 効とする。 うち受験票お researchers at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna, Austria, have found. Dogs won't give food to a human, even if that person gave them some food first, and that they would help other dogs that had helped them before. Therefore, the team Previous studies have shown that dogs can recognize cooperative and uncooperative humans, "reciprocal altruism"- that is, doing a good thing in return to a human who had given expected to find that their test subjects would put these two things together and show To start, the team trained a group of 37 dogs to press a button which would activate a them food first. *enclosure with the dispenser, while one of (2) two humans was in a separate enclosure with the button. One would press the button to food dispenser. Then, they put each dog in an would not. Each dog was paired with both humans in give food to the dog, and (4) unhelpful one. turn. After that, the researchers switched over the button and the dispenser. They expected that the dogs would press the button to give food to the helpful human but not to the though the dogs did press the button, they did it just as often when either human had the food dispenser, and even when no human was there at all. "In these kinds of studies (5) [perform / to / dogs / which/ trained / are in a particular behavior for an experiment, they will usually do the behavior a few times as they have simply learned the association between the behavior and getting a reward, and it may be enjoyable for them to do the behavior," said Jim McGetrick, a PhD student at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna who led the research. 身を正しく が本冊子 1番 2 次の英文を読んで下の設問に答えなさい。 (3) giving us some food? Are they a combination of reasons. "It is (6) Why wouldn't our best pals want to help us out by secretly all bad boys and girls? McGetrick believes there is possible that the dogs did not understand enough about the task to realize that only one of the humans was providing them with food," he said. It could also be because they didn't fully understand the button and dispenser system, or because they were too focused on the food to notice whether a particular human was pressing the button or not. "Having said all that, even if they did completely understand the task and were fully attentive to the actions of the humans, there is still a good possibility that they wouldn't have given food back in return," he added. "It could be that providing food to a dog as they do not typically do that in everyday life." After all, humans are the ones who human is something very strange for (7) already have food, from a dog's perspective. why would your pet need to worry about (8) making sure you have enough? However, all the humans in the study were people the dogs didn't know. "It is quite 5

回答募集中 回答数: 0