学年

質問の種類

数学 高校生

何故こうなるのか、波線部からわかりません 教えてください🙇

基本 例題 31 an+1=pan+(nの1次型の漸化式 00000 次の条件によって定められる数列{az} の一般項を求めよ。 a1=3, an+1=2an-n CHART & SOLUTION 漸化式 an+1=pan+(nの1次式)(カキ1) 1 階差数列の利用 [2] ani-f(n+1)=plan-f(n)} と変形 ②の変形については右ページのズーム UP を参照。 下の解答は①の方針による解法で,別解は②の方針による解法である。 解答 an+2=2an+1-(n+1), an+1=2an-n an+2-αn+1=2(an+1-an)-1 基本 29 30 与えられた漸化式で、 をn+1とおく。 辺々引いて また bn=an+1-an とおくと bn+1=2bn-1 b=az-α= (2·3-1)-3=2 ...... ・① ①から bn+1-1=2(6-1) α=2α-1 を解くと 更に b-1=1 α=1 ゆえに、数列{bm-1}は初項1,公比2の等比数列となり bn-1=1・2n-1 すなわち bn=2n-1+1 よって≧2のとき n-1 an=1+2 (2-1+1)=3+- k=1 =2"-1+n+1 a = 3 であるから,この式は n=1のときにも成り立つ。 したがって an=2"-1+n+1 1-8 if b=21+1を求め an+1=2an-n lan+1-an=27-1+1 から an+1を消去して an=2-1+n+1 と求めてもよい。 ◆ n=1 とすると 2°+1+1=3 した後は 2"-1-1 +(n-1) 2-1 別解 an+1=2an-n を変形すると an+1-(n+2)=2{an-(n+1)} また a-(1+1)=3-2=1 ゆえに, 数列{an- (n+1)) は, 初項1 公比2の等比数列 となり an-(n+1)=1•2η-1 したがって a=2"-'+n+1 この変形については ページのズームUPを 参照。

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

問4の⑤の計算はどうすれば合うのですか。 教えてください🙇‍♀️ 3枚目が答えです。

次の英文を読んで,下の設問に答えなさい。 Last year, 4.2 million babies died. That is the most recent number reported by UNICEF of deaths before the age of one, worldwide. We often see lonely and emotionally charged numbers like this in the news or in the materials of activist groups or organizations. They produce a reaction. Who can even imagine 4.2 million dead babies? It is so terrible, and even worse when we know that almost all died from easily preventable diseases. And how can anyone argue that 4.2 million is anything other than a huge number? You might think that nobody would even try to argue (that, but you would be wrong. That is exactly why I mentioned this number. Because it is not huge: it is beautifully small. If we even start to think about how tragic each of these deaths is for the parents who had waited for their newborn to smile, and walk, and play, and instead had to bury their baby, then this number could keep us crying for a long time. But who would be helped by these tears? Instead let's think clearly about human suffering. The number 4.2 million is for 2016. The year before, the number was 4.4 million. The year before that, it was 4.5 million. Back in 1950, it was 14.4 million. That's almost 10 million more dead babies per year, compared with today. Suddenly this terrible number starts to look smaller. In fact (2)the number has never been lower. Of course, I am the first person to wish the number was even lower and falling even faster. But to know how to act, and how to prioritize resources, nothing can be more important than doing the cool-headed math and realizing what works and what doesn't. And this is clear: more and more deaths are being prevented. comparing the numbers. (3). We would never realize that without

解決済み 回答数: 1