学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

至急!!私立大学看護学部の過去問です。答えがないため、回答を作って欲しいです!!科目は英語です。

問題番号に対応 効とする。 うち受験票お researchers at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna, Austria, have found. Dogs won't give food to a human, even if that person gave them some food first, and that they would help other dogs that had helped them before. Therefore, the team Previous studies have shown that dogs can recognize cooperative and uncooperative humans, "reciprocal altruism"- that is, doing a good thing in return to a human who had given expected to find that their test subjects would put these two things together and show To start, the team trained a group of 37 dogs to press a button which would activate a them food first. *enclosure with the dispenser, while one of (2) two humans was in a separate enclosure with the button. One would press the button to food dispenser. Then, they put each dog in an would not. Each dog was paired with both humans in give food to the dog, and (4) unhelpful one. turn. After that, the researchers switched over the button and the dispenser. They expected that the dogs would press the button to give food to the helpful human but not to the though the dogs did press the button, they did it just as often when either human had the food dispenser, and even when no human was there at all. "In these kinds of studies (5) [perform / to / dogs / which/ trained / are in a particular behavior for an experiment, they will usually do the behavior a few times as they have simply learned the association between the behavior and getting a reward, and it may be enjoyable for them to do the behavior," said Jim McGetrick, a PhD student at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna who led the research. 身を正しく が本冊子 1番 2 次の英文を読んで下の設問に答えなさい。 (3) giving us some food? Are they a combination of reasons. "It is (6) Why wouldn't our best pals want to help us out by secretly all bad boys and girls? McGetrick believes there is possible that the dogs did not understand enough about the task to realize that only one of the humans was providing them with food," he said. It could also be because they didn't fully understand the button and dispenser system, or because they were too focused on the food to notice whether a particular human was pressing the button or not. "Having said all that, even if they did completely understand the task and were fully attentive to the actions of the humans, there is still a good possibility that they wouldn't have given food back in return," he added. "It could be that providing food to a dog as they do not typically do that in everyday life." After all, humans are the ones who human is something very strange for (7) already have food, from a dog's perspective. why would your pet need to worry about (8) making sure you have enough? However, all the humans in the study were people the dogs didn't know. "It is quite 5

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

所々分からない部分があるので教えて欲しいです よろしくお願いします🙏

Work Complete the sentences below to match the Japanese. If everyone ( ) best-before dates properly, we ( waste. ) all children ( I( 1. 誰もが賞味期限を正しく理解していれば、フードロスをいくらか防ぐことができるのに。 2. すべての子どもたちに食物の安全な取り扱いについて学ぶ機会があればなあ。 3. 水問題についてまるで他人事のように話すべきではない。 4. この最新のオーブンレンジがなければ、より多くのフードロスが生じるでしょう。 We should not talk about water issues ( business. ) ( ) ( ) not ( there would be more food waste. ) a chance to learn about safe food handling. ) prevent some food 3.〈状況〉水問題について議論するハルトの様子を描写します。[be] Haruto is discussing water issues as if he ) they were none of our B Complete the sentences below using the verbs in the brackets. 1. <状況> もし自分がお金持ちならどんなことをするかを述べます。 [be, donate] If I rich, I 2.〈状況〉フードロスを減らすためにできるとよいことを述べます。 [plan, avoid] I wish everyone _unog srij their meals and 4. 〈状況〉もしその村に井戸がなかったら,と考えます。 [be, have If it for the well, villagers ) this latest microwave oven, to fight against food waste. impulse buying. an expert. access to drinking water.

未解決 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

高1英語grammar話法についての説明なのですが、 水色マーカーの文において、なぜknowは現在形なのにwasは過去形になっているのでしょうか。 時制の一致が行われていない気がしています。 解説をお願いします。 (どんな時に合わせないのかが分からないです。)

S 1 時制の一致 1. I know (that) Tom is tired. 2. I knew (that) Tom was tired. 3. I know (that) Tom was tired. 4. I knew (that) Tom had been tired. 11 時制の一致の原則: 主節が表す時制が基準となって, 従属節の動詞の形が決まる。 主節の動 過去形であれば,それに合わせて従属節の動詞も過去形 (2) や過去完了形 (4) になる. 時制の一致と助動詞 BASER 注意 la) 過去形になるもの: will would, shall→should, can→could, may might I am afraid that I may hurt her feelings. →I was afraid that I might hurt her feelings. b)変わらないもの:should, must, need, had better, ought to, used to 2 時制の一致の例外: 次のような場合,原則として 「時制の一致」 は適用されない. 5. We learned that the earth goes around the sun. 6. Jim said that he jogs every morning. 7. He didn't know that World War ⅡI broke out in 1939. a) 真理・ことわざ (5) : 時に関わらず不変の事がらなので、 現在形のまま b) 現在も変わらない事実習慣習性(→6): 現在形のまま C) 歴史上の事実 (7) : 過去に起こったということが明らかなので、 過去形のまま d) 仮定法: 非現実のことを述べるので,主節の時制の変化による影響を受けない. He says that he would become a poet if he were born again. + He said that he would become a poet if he were born again. 11 斜体の 1) Jim 2) Yuji 3) She 4) I we 5) I he 6) I se 7) My 8) I t 2 次の 1) M 2) A 3) M 4) 5) 6) 3 1

未解決 回答数: 1