学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

難しくて分からないので教えてください🙇‍♀️

3 )内から適切なものを選びなさい。 (1) Sarah lost her cellphone, so I ( cannot / must not ) call her. (2) We've just finished cleaning.( Must / May ) we go home now? (3)I( can / must ) study for tomorrow's test. I haven't learned any of the words yet. (4) You( should not /might not ) park yourbike here. ton (5)( Could / Should ) you help me with my homework? nted (6) Sophie studied hard. She ( cannot / must ) have failed the test. (7) He( should reply / should have replied ) to the email yesterday. (8) There ( used to / would ) be a big castle on the hill. (9) You( may / may not ) have noticed, but Ken winked at you at the party. 4( )内に入るものを選択肢から1つずつ選び, 記号で答えなさい。 ma (1) Baseball is ( )all over the world. (2) This novel was written ( )Soseki Natsume. (3) The Korean rock band has ( )warmly received in Japan. (4) The mountain is covered ( )snow. (5) It is( ) that Americans show their feelings openly. 【選択肢】 ア.with イ. enjoyed ウ. by エ, said オ、 been )内の語(句)を正しく並べかえなさい。 5 日本語に合うように, ( (1)最初に先生の許可を求めておくべきでした。 We(for / have/should / our teacher's / asked) permission first. (2)『ワンピース』は何か国語に翻訳されていますか。 How many languages ( One Piece I been / into/ has/translated )?

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

なぜコンマがつくのか教えてください! コンマがなくても、情報を追加してることには変わりないのではないでしょうか?

B カンマで情報を追加する(非制限用法) 日 pp.271~274 ③ My brother Jeff, who is a chef, lives in Newcastle. 174] us.OW ertけ 175 ④ We stayed at the Grand Hotel, which some friends recommended to 5) I'mgoing to spend two weeks in New York, where my brother lives. 175 ⑥ We looked at two apartments, both of which were excellent. 176] allst ybody19va labas ]el 177| ⑦ She is hardworking, which he is not. Vak O / en-boog \aniblil.] ai inaM 177] 8 My dad is cooking dinner, which doesn't happen very often. 3~8非制限用法:カンマがつく形(非制限用法)は先行詞に追加の情報を加える。 は,関係詞に that を使ったり省略したりすることはできない。 f.[制限用法] She has a son who isa college student. (彼女には大学生である息子が1人いる) ーどの息子かを絞り込むために「大学生である」を加えている。ほかにも息子がいる可能性がある。 [非制限用法] She has a son, who is a college student. ー「彼女には息子が1人いる」と言い切ってから,「その息子が大学生である」という情報を追加して 1Surいる。e 3, who: 固有名詞に追加説明を行う際には,この形が必須。 ④, which: 先行詞は the Grand Hotel。 6, where: 先行詞は New York(関係副詞の非制限用法)。 6, both of which :「その両方」。ほかに half of which(その半分), neither of which(そのどちらも~な い), none of which(そのどれも~ない)など。先行詞が人なら some of whom(そのうちの何人か)など ITips ®この形で gets mo ortt ni abTOW ert odsse ll ot se の形。 Bach had twenty children, some of whom became composers. (バッハには20人の子どもがいて,その何人かは作曲家になった) の8, which は先行する表現や文の内容全体も受けることができる。 の先行する表現(hardworking)を受けている。 8先行する文全体 (My dad is cooking dinner) を受けている。 し うぶ

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

回答募集中 回答数: 0