学年

質問の種類

数学 高校生

英語の長文ってどうやったら読めるようになりますか

1 次の英文を読んで、問 (1) ~ (5) に且本語で答えなさい。 Lobola is the African custom of paying fora bride. Although it is an old custom, not In fact, it is being debated in Botswana. everyone in African cultures is happy with it. Many people, including many women, support payment of lobola. They explain that in Tswana culture, a marriage means joining a family, not just marrying an individual. The idea of marrying into a family is very African. just the man.Through marriage, the young woman's family loses their daughter as she then becomes a part of her husband's family. Lobola is a way to show thanks. It is a form of generosity in African culture. In its traditional form, they also explain, the groom's family gave cattle to the bride's family. But it didn't matter whether the family owned cattle or not. A woman does not get married to A man only had to pay what he could afford if he had no cattle, he could give something else, even the smallest form of payment. The tradition of lobola was a matter of pride. Today, lobola is often given in cash. purchase of a bride. Lobola is meant to join two families together. They know that But its supporters say it is not about the some people abuse the custom. But they believe that the tradition should not be tossed out because it has many positive effects. Rather than get rid of it, many believe it should just be explained better. However, many others say this custom should be stopped. They think it has become commercialized. Families make lots of demands on the groom. They think this makes lobola look very bad. They argue that in Africa's past, a girl was an asset at home. and other household chores. She did the cooking When a family lost that child through marriage, it demanded payment. Today, they think that lobola has changed into a useless tradition. In this custom, a man is buying the right to control a woman. They say women are individuals with rights. In today's world, parents do not have to be paid for a bride because their male and female children are equal. They all work and make contributions to the household. They believe that paying lobola makes it seem like a man is buying a pair of shoes or a bicycle, instead of getting married. They also argue that it is often a financial burden for couples. It is too difficult for many people to pay the price asked. So, is lobola a rich tradition, bringing families together? Or is it an ugly custom of buying women? This debate continues in Botswana, as does the custom.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

共通テスト  fact と opinion の違いがよく分かりません。 例えば問3の「他の店舗で従業員を探すのに苦労している」は意見ではなく、実際に起きていることであるため事実であると思うのですが... ご解説宜しくお願いしますm(_ _)m

you found a B You have to prepare for a debate in class on convenience stores, and good article shown below. Family Stores to Open 24 Hours Family Stores announced today that they would follow other convenience stores and allow their stores to open 24 hours a day, starting from August 1 Family Stores operate on a type of franchise system where the manager of a -store is also the owner of the store. This means that the manager of a store can make the important decisions about how tó run the store and whether to open 5 for 24 hours. Although other convenience stores have had problems with opening for 24 hours, Family Stores believe that they can be successful because of the location of their stores. Shinji Yamada, the President of Family Stores, said, “Most of our stores are in residential areas inside Tokyo. We think that in these areas there is less competition with supermarkets so that there is enough demand to 10 keep our stores open.” Also, Family Stores have been very active in promoting automated services and self check-outs. “Many convenience store groups have had problems finding staff to work late at night and so have stopped the 24-hour service," said Mr. Yamada. “However, with our self-service check-out system, our stores may 15 not need to hire extra staff because the customers can serve themselves.” 12 Comments Sena Ishida 12.June 2019, 22:47 This is great news. My local convenience store used to offer 24-hour service, but they stopped because they couldn't find anybody to work late at night. ! hope the self-service system of Family Stores is successful,but I'm worried that it might lead to people not paying for their items.

解決済み 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

見辛かったらすみませんが、問2の英作文の添削をしていただきたいです🤲

2015年度 英語 13 They should not have to lose their livelihoods. Secondlv. although I agree 次の英文は、英語のディベートの授業での対話です。この対話を読み,下の問い に答えなさい。 with Keiko that climate change is a serious problem, I think air travel is a much less damaging source of carbon pollution than, for example, burnimg MR. ROBERTS: Good morning, everybody. Today we have the first of our Coal. We should address these more serious causes first. Finally, the most student debates. The topic this morning is air travel, and the argument is. 法 important reason is the issue of freedom. People in a democracy expect the “Domestic air travel in Japan should be discouraged." Keiko will first argue right to travel as they wish. It has made our lives more convenient and in favor of the proposal and Junko will speak against. Over to you, Keiko. created more opportunities for everyone. We should not reduce our quality of life. Thank you for listening. KEIKO: Good morning, everybody. I am going to speak today in favor of the proposal. Limitless air travel inside Japan is a luxury that we can no longer MR. ROBERTS: Thank you to our two speakers. Now, are there any afford. The main reason is that it is extremely damaging to the questions from the audience? environment. The carbon gases produced by aircraft are very high and are a 頭人 proven cause of global warming. Therefore, we should try and reduce air 問1 次の(1)~(5)の文について, 本文の内容と一致するものには○.一致しないも travel as much as possible to protect the environment, not only for Japan but のには×を,それぞれ解答欄に記入しなさい。 also for the whole world. Secondly, air travel is actually unnecessary within the four islands of Japan. Now, while I appreciate that travel to Okinawa is (1) Keiko's main reason for opposing domestic air travel is the damage it a different case, there are efficient train services throughout Japan that are causes to the environment. h fast and environmentally friendly. These make an excellent alternative to air (2) Keiko thinks that air travel is cheap and efficient. flights, so there is really no need to use airplanes in most cases. Finally, (3) Keiko recommends that people travel between Okinawa and mainland there is an economic reason. Air travel is expensive for passengers because Japan by ship. the price of fuel keeps increasing, but airline companies are still struggling (4) Junko thinks that climate change is not an important problem. to make profits. Moreover, regional airports often cannot attract enough (5) Junko thinks that a lot of jobs will be lost if air travel is reduced. customers, and, overall, the industry is not cost-effective, It's time to admit that air travel is too damaging and expensive to be sustainable. Thank you. 問2 次の質問に英語で答えなさい。 Which of the two speakers do you more agree with? Give at least one JUNKO: Thank you, Keiko. I am going to disagree with the proposal for three reason for your answer. (解答欄:13.8cm×4行) reasons. Firstly, I think there is a strong economic case to support flying. Many jobs depend on air travel, not just the pilots and cabin staff, but also people who work in airports or for airlines, or who rely on fast transport.

回答募集中 回答数: 0