-
![]()
-
![]()
Mookzemcmwearょうに
の
Tem benowr
PT my
rh moee eround the eunr
の @ mr sm
S Ar sm jet the eerth
Ne am
9 @ wwatoher Diyou buy thie beeyeaterdeyr thet bag
ーー PT
the day betom
(0 ぐ Hesaito wm"Plemse dont make noieer
@ Re 5 ーー memke noieer
rcienoe
[回 のEXを郭んで。 あとの各問いに答えよ。
We dlame history, the glory of the past。 more ofeen under fichion than ud
ー iri mumt be afnhated with one or the other。 TFnok that ia hmtory ia lowe
rewt somewhere in betveen the two main divisiops of the kinds of books then 革
"mually admitted that history ia cfoser to fction than to ecionee
This does not mean that a historimn moAes up his factsr hke a poet or story teler
However we might get into trouble iTwe insisted too strongly that a writer of fction
pkes up んis facts He creates aworid。 But this new world is no totaly diierent
fom our own 一 indeed, had better not be 一 and a poetis an ordinary man。 with
grdinary senees by and through which he has enrned. He does not see things that We
annot see (he may see better or in a shightly different way)。 Hi charactere use wordml
that we use (ofherwise we could not behieve in them) 。 It is only in dreams that human
beingm create really strange new worids 一 yet even in the most fantastic dream the
events and creatures of the imagination are made up out of elements of everyday
experience. They are merely put together in strange new ways
人 good historian does not, of course, make up the past. He considers himself
responsibly bound by some concept or oriterion of aceuracy or facts. Nevertheless。it is
3mportant to remember that the historian must alvays make up something. 。He
reteither fnd a generel pattern in_ or impoee one on events: or he must LE
jp kaors why the pereone jn hia story did the things they did。 He may have as genaral
theoryorphiosophyr euch as fhat Provadence les human atiare。and make hishistory
硬 hat Orhe may abjure an such pattern imposed as it were from the outside or
