学年

質問の種類

化学 高校生

⑸の解き方を教えてください

108 2018年度 化学 〔II〕 以下の問いに答え, 17 24 しいものを各解答群の中から1つ選び、記号をマークしなさい。 て にあてはまる答として最もふさわ 水質汚濁の指標としてpH, 濁度化学的酸素要求量 (COD), 生物学的酸素 要求量(BOD),全有機炭素濃度 (TOC) 浮遊物質量 (SS) など数多くある。中で も COD が汚濁指標としてよく用いられている。 COD は, 酸化剤によって水中 の主として有機物を酸化させ、そのとき試料水 1Lあたり消費される酸化剤の量 を,それに相当する酸素の質量(mg/L) に換算した値で表示される。 COD の測定は世界的には二クロム酸酸化法 (COD cr) を採用する場合が多い が,日本ではより環境負荷の少ない過マンガン酸酸化法 (COD Mn) が用いられて 8 ag d s.e いる。 0:01 8.0 S.OF (1) 環境問題に関心のある MJ 君は,飲み忘れて気のぬけた炭酸飲料(二酸化炭 素は完全に除かれている)をそのまま流しに捨てた場合の水質汚濁について COD Mn 法を用いて調べた。 まず、この飲料を脱イオン水で300倍に希釈し た。 (ア)を使ってその水溶液を正確に10mLコニカルビーカーにはかり 取り,ここに脱イオン水を加えて約100mLとし,(イ)を加えて酸性にし 次に、(ウ)を加えてよく振りまぜた後、数分間放置した(この操作は 試料中に含まれる塩化物イオンが反応するのを防ぐ目的で行った)。さらに (ア)を用いて 5.0mmol/Lの過マンガン酸カリウム水溶液10mL を加え, 沸騰水浴中で30分間加熱した。 ここに 12.5mmol/Lのシュウ酸ナトリウム水 3 溶液10mLをア)を用いて加えて混合した。 (エ)に5.0mmol/L 過マ ンガン酸カリウム水溶液を入れ, コニカルビーカーに少しずつ滴下すると, 9.0mL加えたところで(オ)ので、滴定の終点とした。 (09/01 %)*9

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

至急!!私立大学看護学部の過去問です。答えがないため、回答を作って欲しいです!!科目は英語です。

問題番号に対応 効とする。 うち受験票お researchers at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna, Austria, have found. Dogs won't give food to a human, even if that person gave them some food first, and that they would help other dogs that had helped them before. Therefore, the team Previous studies have shown that dogs can recognize cooperative and uncooperative humans, "reciprocal altruism"- that is, doing a good thing in return to a human who had given expected to find that their test subjects would put these two things together and show To start, the team trained a group of 37 dogs to press a button which would activate a them food first. *enclosure with the dispenser, while one of (2) two humans was in a separate enclosure with the button. One would press the button to food dispenser. Then, they put each dog in an would not. Each dog was paired with both humans in give food to the dog, and (4) unhelpful one. turn. After that, the researchers switched over the button and the dispenser. They expected that the dogs would press the button to give food to the helpful human but not to the though the dogs did press the button, they did it just as often when either human had the food dispenser, and even when no human was there at all. "In these kinds of studies (5) [perform / to / dogs / which/ trained / are in a particular behavior for an experiment, they will usually do the behavior a few times as they have simply learned the association between the behavior and getting a reward, and it may be enjoyable for them to do the behavior," said Jim McGetrick, a PhD student at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna who led the research. 身を正しく が本冊子 1番 2 次の英文を読んで下の設問に答えなさい。 (3) giving us some food? Are they a combination of reasons. "It is (6) Why wouldn't our best pals want to help us out by secretly all bad boys and girls? McGetrick believes there is possible that the dogs did not understand enough about the task to realize that only one of the humans was providing them with food," he said. It could also be because they didn't fully understand the button and dispenser system, or because they were too focused on the food to notice whether a particular human was pressing the button or not. "Having said all that, even if they did completely understand the task and were fully attentive to the actions of the humans, there is still a good possibility that they wouldn't have given food back in return," he added. "It could be that providing food to a dog as they do not typically do that in everyday life." After all, humans are the ones who human is something very strange for (7) already have food, from a dog's perspective. why would your pet need to worry about (8) making sure you have enough? However, all the humans in the study were people the dogs didn't know. "It is quite 5

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

至急!!私立大学看護学部の過去問です。答えがないため、回答を作って欲しいです!!科目は英語です。

プペンシルで解 people than ever can find an audience time filled with disasters, online, "conspiracy theories seem to be growing crazier by the day. We also tend to believe in such things under increased stress, which is unfortunate because many of these ideas are Some conspiracy theorists pride themselves on being "critical freethinkers," but a new damaging our democracies and ourselves. study showing a connection between lower critical thinking skills and increased conspiracy (2) theory belief suggests this may not be the case. "Conspiracy theories refer to attempts to explain the ultimate cause of an important event (social, political, climatic, etc.) by accusing a hidden group of perceived evil, powerful people or organizations of having secretly planned and carried out these events," say Paris Nanterre University psychologist Anthony Lantian and team in their paper. two studies, the researchers tested the critical thinking skills of 338 a French version of the Ennis-Weir Critical Thinking Essay Test. They then scored the students' tendencies towards conspiracy beliefs and their personal Across undergraduate students (4) the objective analysis and assessment of their own critical thinking skills. Critical thinking. evaluation of a situation requires a collection of cognitive skills. These include the ability to distinguish between relevant versus irrelevant information, think systematically, see other perspectives, recognize and avoid logical *fallacies, look beyond the obvious, be aware of and avoid biases, and change your mind in light of new evidence. "The more people believe in conspiracy theories, the worse they perform on a critical thinking ability test," Lantian said. "This test is characterized by an *open-ended format highlighting several areas of critical thinking ability in the context of argumentation." (6) All this is not to say that those with high critical thinking skills can't also be sucked into believing things that may not necessarily be true. The way (7) [is wired /a/ makes / thinking/ social species / our / as] us very vulnerable to believing those we identify with as part of our own cultural group- no matter how much education we have had that boosts science literacy. Trust plays a massive role in who we believe. We also have a tendency to believe each of us is above average at detecting misinformation, which can't possibly be true. Researchers have also linked this need to feel special to greater belief in conspiracies. Lantian and team point out that while their study suggests critical thinking lowers Deople's chances of believing in untrue conspiracy theories, the findings don't determine if (8) (9) た場合,そ 数学【数学 験番号 【化学 b てお 3 In a more (1) ① 次の英文を読んで、下の設問に答えなさい。 1 - (3) the po no a E

回答募集中 回答数: 0