赤丸をつけたところが分かりません。ちなみに、【】は副詞句・副詞節、（）は形容詞句・形容詞節、〈〉は名詞句・名詞節です。 1つ目の赤マルは、なぜthat以下が副詞節なのか(自分は名詞節だと思った) 2つ目はの赤マルは、何のofか

[At the turn of the twentieth century, a remarkable horse (named Hans) was paraded [through Germany] [by his owner Wilhelm von S M Osten, a horse trainer and high-school mathematics teacher. Not only could "Clever Hans" understand complex questions (put to him 同格のカンマ 「すなわち」 V S in plain German) 構文図解 M M O 過去分詞の名詞修 [If Tuesday falls on the eighth of the month M - but he could answer them by 0 M M what date is the following Friday?" not only A but (also) B S C S tapping out the correct number] [with his hoof]. [Using this simple V M with 「~を使って」 分詞構文「~して」 M response], it appeared [that Hans could add, subtract, multiply, and S V M add, subtract, multiply, divide divide, tell the time, understand the calendar, and both read and add ~ divide, tell the time, understand the calendar, both words spell words]. Suspicious, the German board (of education) appointed S M M V Being 省略の分詞構文 a commission, (including circus trainers, veterinarians, teachers, and 0 「~を含んだ」 M circus trainers, veterinarians, teachers, psychologists psychologists), to investigate the situation. Surprisingly, they to do C M S concluded [in 1904] <that no trick was involved>. This did not satisfy V V M S O 名詞節のthat the board, and the case was passed [to psychologist Oskar Pfungst) O S V M [for experimental investigation]. [Braving both the horse's and M 名詞節のthat observer of human behavior >. M owner's notoriously bad tempers], Pfungst finally was able to 分詞構文 「~して」 S M V demonstrate <that Hans was no mathematician, but rather a fine not[no] A but (rather) B[ATTB 20 t を使っ 教育

明日テストなので至急お願いしたいです泣 この式の増減を調べグラフを書かないといけないという問題なのですが、最後の極限を求める時にlimitの下のx→○の○の部分はどのようにして決まるのですか？＋無限だったりプラスゼロだったりと何が入るのかわかりません。

(2) f(x) = log(x + 1) - log x - - fl A. C H 2 SA x+1

Bの問題で 並べる時のA〜Fのポイントとなる文（語句）を教えてください！ 例 2番目にくるものとして、howeverとかas a resultとかはおかしいから2番目にC、Dが選ばれることがない 例のようにしてくれると助かります！お願いします！

(6)-C をして ないん 今ま 共有 : それは楽しいだろうね。 わかった, じゃあ, ユースホステ ルを調べてみるよ｡ B. <オバマ大統領の母の人生 A. アメリカ大統領バラク=オバマの母であるアン=ダナム=ソエトロは, 彼女自身印象的な人生を送ってきた。 E. オバマの父親は東アフリカのケニアという国の出身であったが、 彼の 母親のソエトロはアメリカ本土で育ち、後に両親とともにハワイに移住し た。 彼女はハワイ大学で人類学を学んだが, その後, インドネシアの村や 小さな町で生涯の仕事を見つけた。 B. 彼女はインドネシアの公用語が流暢になり、多くの女性たちと村の市 場や彼女たちの家で話をした。 職業上の仕事と人類学者としての研究をし ている間に、ソエトロは男女の平等と地域社会における女性の役割という 問題に対する意識が高くなった。 D. その結果, 彼女はインドネシアやその他のアジアの農村地域に暮らす 低所得の女性たちの経済状態を改善する手助けをする先駆者として認めら れることとなっ F. 彼女の仕事はオバマに大きな影響を与えた。 オバマが小学生の時、彼 は母親と共に数年間インドネシアで暮らしたが,後にハワイに戻り, アメ リカ人の祖父母に育てられた。 C. しかし, ソエトロの社会変化と社会正義への関心は,後に政治的キャ リアにおいて重要となる価値観を息子に与えたと言われている。 実際, 2008年の大統領選挙のキャンペーンでの「私たちは,きっと変われる｣ というスローガンは母親の影響を直接受けて生まれたものだと言うことさ えできるだろう。 ◆解説◆ A. (1)旅行の計画について聞かれたケンジの返答。 空所直後で宿泊先が決 まっていないと言っているのでBが正解となる。 (2)空所直前で けてる・ホステルでは非常に多くの人と1つの部 解答編

an unusual assignment からどうやっても和訳がわからないです。forからphysicsまで副詞の塊なのはなぜですか？

geologist, an unusual assignment <for a biologist who was self- Peter was assigned to do research on earthquakes S V₁ and spent the next six years working as as V2 O2 taught in mathematics and physics, but he was an SVC excellent choice. CD 2-70 単語チェック [ assign [asáin]~ ~動~を割り当てる ] 仕事や義務などを人に割り当てるの意味です。 名詞形の an assignment は米語で 「宿題」 の意味です。 be assigned to (V) で 「〜を命じら れる」という意味で使われます。 [ageologist [dzi:áladgist] 名 地質学者 ] geo- は 「土」 を表し, log は 「論理」から. geology は 「地質学」です。

Reading Advantages3 です。 穴埋めが分からないので教えてください。

ble? a. president b. cleaner B. Complete the paragraph with items from the box. Two items are extra. actually commented expected made the headlines media neighboring potentially riddle significant spectacularly visible worship shapes (3) in the local (4) "This stone is for people who celebrate with fire." Archaeologists in England thought they had made an amazing discovery in July 2003, when tourists on a beach found ancient carvings on a large block of stone. The archaeologists believed that the discovery of the stone, which had been imported from Norway in the 1980s and used to make a wall, was (1). The carvings of two snakes, a dragon, and other Experts translated the stone to say, very (2) However, two months later, the archaeologists were surprised when the (5) of the carvings was solved by a fifty-year-old local builder, Barry Luxton. The man, who had seen a photograph in a newspaper, told them that he was (6) the one who had made the shapes - in 1995! Luxton said that over a period of three days he had made the carvings for a celebration on a (7) beach that was going to be held by a group of druids people who nature. However, the block did not end up being moved to the other beach and (8) was eventually covered by sand. Recent bad weather blew the sand away, making the carvings (9) again. Luxton was surprised; he really never (10) that his work would become so famous. Review 1 - 5 25

One common idea among psychologists has been that people could deal with suffering more effectively if they were able to understand and a... 続きを読む

※色々書き込んでいて見にくくてすみません い these studiesが示しているものを答えよ という問題で答えは3でした。 これはstudyとexperimentが同じ意味だからですか？ 違えば説明お願いしたいです。

easily, there can be a benefit to changing direction and trying something (D) our new. But our bias toward the familiar) can make it difficult to comfort train Psychologists have designed experiments participants to solve a problem one way, and then offer the option of switching to a much faster method. (Overwhelmingly, according to Pope,) zone. that people tend not to take the shortcut. "They continue with the learned variou (of approach, despite its inefficiency" Pope says that various versions of these tests have reached a similar conclusion, suggesting to the psychological x community that this inflexible thinking is an innate part of being human. 5 But Pope and Ionescu argue that this conclusion is premature, because these studies have only considered WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich and Democratic) humans. To investigate cognitive b flexibility in a non-WEIRD population, Pope traveled to Namibia to meet the Himba people. 6

(1)の並べ替えの問題なのですが、解説が付いていなくて分かりません。どなたか教えてください。 私は2番にしたのですが、答えは1番でした

Humans have spent tens of thousands of years/developing ways to send signals of interest that are easy to interpret. Interestingly, many of the signals that are easiest to interpret are also, in some sense, the costliest to send. Biologists believe that [assist / costly signals / evolution / in the mating (1) - market/ sometimes leads to / that]. The peacock's tail serves an example. A male peacock does not get a lot of direct benefit from a huge, heavy, colorful tail that advertises his presence to enemies and makes it harder to escape from

問3について質問です。 当方、全くいい案が浮かばなかったのですが、皆さんがこのような英作文に当たったらどう対処しますか❓ 具体例としてはニホンカワウソやツシマヤマネコ、トキ、コウノトリが挙げられるようですが私はどの生き物も英語で書けません。(/ω＼*) ちなみに私はホ... 続きを読む

次の英文を読み, 設問に答えなさい。 Jaguars had called the American Continents their home since the Ice Age when their ascendents crossed the Bering Land Bridge that once joined what is now Alaska and Russia. They lived in the central mountains of the southwestern United States for hundreds of years until they were almost driven to extinction in the mid- 20th century after hunters shot the last one in the 1960s. Currently, jaguars are found in 19 different countries. Several males have been observed in Arizona and New Mexico over the last 20 years, but breeding pairs have not been seen or reported north of Mexico. Natural reestablishment of them is also unlikely because of urbanization and the U.S.-Mexico border blocking jaguar migration routes. Now, after more than a 50-year absence, conservation scientists are suggesting the jaguar's return to their native environment in a study that outlines what the rewilding effort may look like. The authors of the new paper suggest a suitable area for jaguars spanning 2 million acres from central Arizona to New Mexico. The space would provide a big enough range for 90 to 150 jaguars, the researchers explained. They also argued that bringing jaguars back to the U.S. is crucial to species conservation as they are listed as near-threatened on the IUCN Red List, and reintroduction could also help restore native ecosystems, the Associated Press reports. "The jaguar lived in these mountains long before Americans did. If done

この問題のアに当てはまるのが、理由・原因のfromとのことなのですが、理由のforはなぜ入れられないのですか？ イ~ウでforが入らずに残るので消去法から外れたりはしないです💦

Richard Waverly was a 37-year-old history teacher. One day he was driving to skipping breakfast. He was also work, tired after a late night and hungry in a bad mood following a quarrel with his wife. At a busy junction, he lost control, drove into a telegraph pole and was thrown through the windscreen. The 5 paramedics said he was dead before he hit the pavement. This story is fictitious, but when psychologist Jesse Bering narrated it to volunteers, he discovered something you probably couldn't make up. Asked questions イ "do you think Richard knows he is dead?" and "do you think he wishes he had told his wife he loved her before he died?", large numbers of volunteers answered yes. For many, who had already professed a belief in the afterlife, this was no big surprise. However even people who totally rejected the idea of life after Heath-so-called extinctivists also answered yes. - ア