学年

質問の種類

物理 高校生

教えてくれると幸いです

10. 水圧 3分 次の文章中の空欄 |に入れる指数として最も適当な数字を下の①~⑤のうちか ら1つ選べ。 水圧は水面からの深さによって変化する。 水深1.0mの場所の水圧と, 水深2.0mの場所の水圧を比 べた場合, 水圧は 9.8×10 Pa だけ異なる。 ただし, 水の密度を1.0×10°kg/m3, 重力加速度の大き さを 9.8m/s2 とする。 また, 1Pa=1N/m² である。 ① 1 ②2 ③3 ④ 4 ⑤ 5 11. 糸の長さが変わる振り子 3分 長さが1で, 伸び縮 みしない軽い糸の一端に, 質量mの小球をつけ,これを 図のように 1/2 だけ垂直な段差のついた水平な天井の点0 から段差にそってつるす。 次に, 糸がたるまないように, 小球を点Aまで持ち上げて静かに手をはなすと, 小球は 最下点Bを通過して, 点Cに達した。 小球が点Cに達するときの速さはいくらか。 次の① ⑤ のうちから正しいものを1つ選べ。 ただし, 重力加速 度の大きさをg とする。 B √gl ① gl 2 V 2 ③√gi ④√2gl 62√gl 06 (m) [2021 追試] A [2001 武蔵工大 改〕 12. ばねに押し出された小物体の運動 5分 図のように, 小物体を軽いばねに押しつ け, ばねを自然の長さからxだけ縮めた後, 静かにはなした。 小物体は水平面上を運動 した後, 曲面をのぼり, 点Aで速さ 0に なった。 小物体の質量をm, ばね定数を k, 重力加速度の大きさをgとし, すべての 面はなめらかであるものとする。 8000000 自然の長さ い h 問1 ばねから離れて水平面上を運動する小物体の速さ”を表す式として正しいものを次の①~⑥ のうちから1つ選べ。 2kx ① kx2 ② kx2 m ④ 2kx k m 2m m V m x ⑥ ko V 2m x 問2点Aの水平面からの高さんとして正しいものを次の① ⑥ のうちから1つ選べ。 112 ① mv2 02 v" mv2 (4) g g mg 2g 2g 10第1編力と運動 M+ 2mg dom M [2016 本試]

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

15年の内で私が京都を訪れる最初の時だという文には完了が使えるのに15年の内で初めて京都を訪れているという文には完了系が使えないのですか?違いが分からないので教えて頂きたいです。よろしくお願いいたします。

・「京都は15年ぶりなんです」 悩む velmi hot Jaysb we] [txen Jasq] las ・「最後に京都を訪れて以来, 15年である」 ・It is(has been fifteen years • Fifteen years have passed since I • was last in • last visited文 Kyoto last came toldjob asrt noislugoqed 1.0.0 - 補語に ならない Mである!! . ・「これは15年のうちで私が京都を訪れる最初の時だ」 This is to the first time x for the first time . last stayed in NAT (NU) Oni (lo on | Kyoto the fifteen years ⚫ I've been to [in] I've visited [come to / stayed in]] aldiazoq ai I haven't visited 「私は15年間京都を訪れていなかった」 ・「これは15年のうちで京都への最初の旅行 [訪問] だ 」 = This is my first trip [visit] to Kyoto in for [in] fifteen years. for xie すべての中で fifteen years × time to come ← 〈This is one's first +行為名詞~〉を用いる! 「私は15年のうちで初めて京都を訪れている」 ertime seri Dangliest art ・I'm visiting [staying in] Kyoto 10 for the first x visit 性 | x I have been to [in] 1x first in fifteen years まず第一の意味 「行ってきたところだ」 という〈完了〉のニュアンスになってしまう!

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

線を引いたところの訳し方を丁寧に教えて頂きたいです🙇‍♀️

L American poet Ralph Waldo Emerson once said, "Every artist was first an amateur." He likely never thought those words would apply to machines. Yet artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated a growing talent for creativity, whether writing a heavy-metal rock album or producing an original portrait that is strikingly similar to a Rembrandt. Applying AI to the art world might seem unoriginal; there are, of course, plenty of humans delivering awe-inspiring work. Supporters say, however, the real beauty of training AI to be creative does not lie in the end product-but rather in the technology's potential to expand on its own machine-learning education, and to solve problems by thinking in different ways far faster and better than humans can. For example, creative problem-solving AI could someday make snap decisions that save the lives of the passengers in a self-driving car if its sensors fail. AI with a creative component will be essential in developing highly automated systems that can respond appropriately to human life, says Mark Riedl, an associate professor at Georgia Institute of Technology's School of Interactive Computing. "The fact is, we do lots of little bits of creativity every single day; lots of problem-solving goes on," Riedl says. "If my son gets a toy stuck under the couch, I have to devise a tool from a hanger to get it out." Riedl points out human creativity is also important in human social interactions, even telling a well-timed joke or recognizing a pun. Computers struggle with such subtleties. An incomplete understanding of how humans construct metaphors, for example, was all it took for an experiment in Al-generated literature to compose a new Harry Potter chapter filled with nonsensical sentences such as, "The floor of the castle seemed like a large pile

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

(2)から(7)まで全部分かりません😭 答えと、その答えになる理由を教えてください。 沢山書き込みをしているのですが無視してください。 見にくくてすいません。🥲 お願いします🙇‍♀️

(2) 自分のしたことを他人に認めてもらおうともらうまいと問題ではない。 matter/may/others It (approve/doesn't / matter / I may /* others/whether) of your work or not, It No (4 of your work or not. I don't know why but it (as me / none / I strange / the passengers uttered a word. I don't know why but it a word. (4)我々のものの見方は、 我々の知識によって大きな影響を受ける。 (5) what we view things. */18+ ⑦ we know. not f Lost water whether, of struck/that) the passengers uttered is very much affected (☞ what / ↑ view / by / I things / how / we / very much affected) we know. (5) 失ってみて初めて, 持っているものの価値に気付くことがよくある。 (6) lost a the things. We often don't recognize (♬ have // /// 5) /them/the things / until/ + the value / we / we've). + We often don't recognize T T Ø I PIB₤. エウキ I passed (I took at // but I could never the other courses / I my university / pass botany/that/all). オ I passed 10 11 (7) 我が家族は向かい側の隣人とすぐ仲良しになりました。 made friends of cur family with neighb Soon (7 the road/family/made / neighbors / our/friends/* across/ thewith) with) Soon cur (12) I across the road No. Date

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

投げやりです。すいません。英語皆無なので代行してください。

【必答問題 5 日常使う物のデザインをする際には標準化 (standardization) という方法がある。 という内容に続く次の英文を読んで、あとの問いに答えよ。(配点44) If we examine the history of advances in all technological fields, we see that some improvements come naturally through the technology itself, while others come through standardization. The early history of the automobile is a good example. The first cars were very difficult to operate. They required strength and skill beyond the abilities of many. Some problems were solved through automation. Other aspects of cars and driving were standardized through the long process of international standards committees: . On which side of the road to drive (constant within countries) country, but variable across On which side f the car the driver sits (depends upon which side of the road the car is driven) -The (2) of essential components: steering wheel, brake, clutch, and accelerator (the same, whether on the left- or right-hand side of the car) Standardization is one type of cultural constraint. With standardization, once you have learned to drive one car, you feel confident that you can drive any car, anyplace in the world. Standardization provides a major breakthrough in usability. I have enough friends on national and international standards committees to realize that the process f determining an internationally accepted standard is laborious. Even when all members agree on the merits of standardization, the task of selecting standards becomes a long, political issue. A small company can standardize its products without too much difficulty, but it is much more difficult for an industrial, national, or international body to agree to standards. There even exists a standardized procedure for establishing national and international standards. organizations works on standards. First, a set of national and international Then when a new standard is proposed, it must work its way through each organization's approval process. Standards are usually the result of a *compromise among the various competing positions, which can often be an inferior compromise. Sometimes the answer is to agree on (4 ). Look at the existence I both metric and *English units; of left-hand- and 18 right-hand-drive automobiles. There are several international standards for the *voltages and *frequencies of electricity, and several different kinds of electrical plugs and sockets- which cannot interchanged. With all these difficulties and with the continual advances in technology, are standards really necessary? Yes, they are. Take the everyday, clock. It's standardized. Consider how much trouble you would have telling time with a backward clock, where the hands revolved "counterclockwise." A few such clocks exist, primarily as humorous conversation pieces. When a clock truly violates standards, such as (the one in Figure 1, it is difficult to determine what time is being displayed. Why? The logic behind the time display is identical to that of conventional clocks: there are only two differences - the hands move in the opposite direction (counterclockwise) and the location of "12," usually at the top, has been moved. This clock is just as logical as the standard one. It. bothers us because we have standardized on a different scheme, on the very definition of the term clockwise. Without such standardization, clock reading would be more difficult: you'd always have to figure out the "mapping. E) compromise *metric メートル法の *English units イギリスの計量法(ヤードボンド法) *frequencies of electricity 電気の周波数 voltages E *mapping 対応づけ (2つのものの間の関係を意味する専門用語) 問1 下線部(1)の内容を、 同じ段落の自動車の例に基づいて30字以内の日本語で答えよ。た だし、句読点も字数に数える。 問2 本文中の空所 (2) に入る語として最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ 選び 記号で答えよ。 7 color イ location ウ price I sight (239) 問3 第2パラグラフ (Standardization is one type of ...) について 次の Question に対す る Answer となるように、空所に入れるのに最も適当なものを,次のア~エのうちから一 つ選び、 記号で答えよ。 Question: What is "a major breakthrough in usability" provided by standardization? Answer Because of standardization, you ( device of the same kind all over the world. 7 can apply what you have learned to イ can make cannot produce I cannot use what you have learned when using 問7 下線部(5)が表す図 (Figure 1)として最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ選 び記号で答えよ。 11 12 1 12 ) any machine or 10 2 10% 9 3 1 5 6 問4 下線部(3)の示す内容を, 40字程度の日本語で答えよ。 ただし, 句読点も字数に数える。 ウ 11 6 1 問5 次の文を第3パラグラフ (Ihave enough friends...) に入れるとき,本文中の①~ のうちのどの位置に入れるのが最も適当か、 次のア~エのうちから一つ選び, 記号 で答えよ。 9 3 Each step is complex, for if there are three ways of doing something, then there are sure to be strong proponents of each of the three ways, plus people who will argue that it is too early to standardize. 70 問8 最終パラグラフ (With all these difficulties...) の内容をもとに, 次の Question に2 語程度の英語一文で答えよ。 Question: According to the writer, why is the standardization of the everyday clo necessary? イ 2 ウ H O 問6 本文中の空所 (4) に入れるのに最も適当なものを、次のア~エのうちから一つ選び 記号で答えよ。 7 a single standard 1 several different standards ウ the same standard I too few standards <<-20-> <-21->

回答募集中 回答数: 0
1/55