学年

質問の種類

英語 高校生

仮定法の英作文についてです! 「もしプラスチックがなかったら」というテーマで英作文を書いたのですが、間違ってる文やおかしな部分があったら教えて欲しいです😢 暗唱テストなので、なるべく短めにしています🙇🏻‍♀️՞ よろしくお願いします🙏🏻

If there were no plastic, the environment would be cleaner. ( because waste would be reduced. 2 Also, animals would be safer because they would not eat plastic. 3 However, if there were no plastic, products would become heavier. , because they would be made of glass or metal. 4 Also, product prices would become higher because glass and metal cost more to produce. 5 If there were no plastic, the environment would improvert but life would be inconvenient. a 1 もしプラスチックがなかったら、環境ばよりきれいになるでしょう、なぜならごみが減るからです。 2.また、動物たちはプラスチックを食べなくなるので、より安全にするでしょう。 3 しかし、もしプラスチックがなかったら、製品は重くなるでしょう、なぜならガラスや金属で作られることになるから 4 また、ガラスや金属は作るのにお金がかかるので、製品の値段は高くなるでしょう。 5. もしプラスチックがなかったら、環境はよくなりますが、生活は不便になるでしょう。 で '

未解決 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

問4の⑤の計算はどうすれば合うのですか。 教えてください🙇‍♀️ 3枚目が答えです。

次の英文を読んで,下の設問に答えなさい。 Last year, 4.2 million babies died. That is the most recent number reported by UNICEF of deaths before the age of one, worldwide. We often see lonely and emotionally charged numbers like this in the news or in the materials of activist groups or organizations. They produce a reaction. Who can even imagine 4.2 million dead babies? It is so terrible, and even worse when we know that almost all died from easily preventable diseases. And how can anyone argue that 4.2 million is anything other than a huge number? You might think that nobody would even try to argue (that, but you would be wrong. That is exactly why I mentioned this number. Because it is not huge: it is beautifully small. If we even start to think about how tragic each of these deaths is for the parents who had waited for their newborn to smile, and walk, and play, and instead had to bury their baby, then this number could keep us crying for a long time. But who would be helped by these tears? Instead let's think clearly about human suffering. The number 4.2 million is for 2016. The year before, the number was 4.4 million. The year before that, it was 4.5 million. Back in 1950, it was 14.4 million. That's almost 10 million more dead babies per year, compared with today. Suddenly this terrible number starts to look smaller. In fact (2)the number has never been lower. Of course, I am the first person to wish the number was even lower and falling even faster. But to know how to act, and how to prioritize resources, nothing can be more important than doing the cool-headed math and realizing what works and what doesn't. And this is clear: more and more deaths are being prevented. comparing the numbers. (3). We would never realize that without

解決済み 回答数: 1
1/49