回答を教えてください。可能であれば理由も教えていただけるとありがたいです。

Work in pairs. Complete sentence pairs 1-6 with these indefinite pronouns. anywhere anything everyone everything nobody nothing somebody was happy to eat pizza 1 I think 2 again. I don't think anyone was unhappy = to eat pizza again. on our menu is vegetarian. = Nothing on our menu has meat or fish in it. 3 I didn't have 4 to eat for breakfast. I had = to eat for said the food was too spicy. breakfast. = I didn't hear anyone say the food was too spicy. 5 Can anybody help me wash the dishes? = I'd like dishes. 6 We couldn't find to help me wash the that sold vegetarian food. = Nowhere we looked served vegetarian food.

英文熟考下36の解説2がよく分かりません。「助動詞＋動詞」と「動詞」を比較するってどういうことですか？

80 ◆比較 36 比較対象の前置に注意 (If she had not spent that year (in Rome)), she would be 接 S' ByJ' M₁ V' O' M'2 S By V even less competent (than she is now) (in explaining the c 接 S' M' 36186 current political situation (in Italy)〉, much less 〈in convincing others to accept her views). 日本語訳例 ※1 M2 M3 もし彼女がローマでその1年を過ごしていなかったら,イタリアの現在の政治状況 を説明する能力も、ましてや自分の意見を受け入れるように他人を説得する能力も、 今よりさらに劣っていただろう。 ※2 ※3 ※4 ※1 ※2 《 even + 比較級》 は 「さらに~」 という訳をしてください。 that year は 「その年」ではなく「その1年」 とした方が明確です。 blito dose no doym ださい。 ※3 「~においてさらに無能になっていただろう」 「~においてさらに有能ではないだろう」 など は不自然な日本語です。 「~するのがさらに難しくなっていただろう」 は可です。 ※4 much lessの前で訳を区切り、「~であろうし、まして･･･はなおさらである」とするのは不適 切です。 英文分析 28 (c) 「比較対象の前置」 は出てくると非常に難しく感じます。 しっかり理解してください。 1. 比較対象の前置 例 We must make as much effort as we can to preserve nature. 「私達は自然を守るようにできるだけ努力をしなければならない」 この文がどうなってできたかを考えてみましょう。 次の文が元の文です。本 We must make as much effort to preserve nature as we can make much effort to preserve nature. [自然を守るのにやるべき努力の量] ≧ [自然を守るのにできる努力の量] 「自然を守るためにできるだけの努力をすべきだ」 1番目のas のあとに much effort がありますが, 2番目の as の後ろの重複している 同じ部分を取り去ります。 次に共通要素の make と to preserve nature を省略すると次 のような文になります。 We must make as much effort to preserve nature as we can. この英文でも全く問題がないのですが,アメリカ人 イギリス人などの英語ネイティ - ブはQS as が離れるのを嫌がる場合があり, as we can をもっと前に置くことがあり ます。 それによって to preserve nature を強調することになります。 → We must make as much effort as we can to preserve nature. この場合に, to preserve nature と effort との関係が見えにくくなるので注意が必要 です。このように as we can などの比較対象が前に出ることを「比較対象の前置」と言 います。 本間では, she would be even less competent in (V)ing, much less in (V2)ing than she is competent in (Ving, much less in (Ving now から than she is now を competent の直後に移動しています。 2. 現実と仮想の比較? 現実と仮想の比較をする場合には 「助動詞+動詞」と「動詞」を比較します。 例 If everyone in the world spoke the same language, it would be much easier to promote world peace than it is now. 「世界のみんなが同じ言語を話すならば,現在よりも世界平和を促進しやすくなる であろう」 本問では, she would be even less competent (仮想) と than she is now (現実)が まだい 比較されています。 3. 条件節が仮定法過去完了で,主節が仮定法過去 条件節 (if節)の内容が過去のこと (仮定法過去完了)で、主節の内容が現在のこと ( 仮定法過去) の場合があります。 「昔~だったら, 今頃は･･･なのに」という意味です。 例 If I had been born in the U.S., I could speak more fluent English now. 「もしアメリカで生まれていたら、今頃はもっと流ちょうに英語が話せるのに」 本間もこの形になっていることに注意してください。 Esc 2 T 81

あってますか

" 8.日本語に合うように、空所に適切な英語を入れなさい。 (1) この店ではりんごはみかんより人気があります。 Apples are mare Popular than (2) 東京スカイツリーは日本で最も高い建物です。 the highest Tokyo Skytree is (3) 兄は私よりもたくさんの本を持っています。 My older brother has more books most beautiful (4) これは5つの中で最も美しい絵です 。 This is the oranges in this shop. building in Japan. than I do. painting of the five. 9-1. 次の日本語に合うように,( )に適切な英語を入れなさい。 (1) 私たちの教室は毎日そうじされます。 Our classroom ( is (2) このいすは木で作られています。 This chair ( )( cleaned ) every day. made ) ( of ) wood. (fregsuawttg) (3)これら2つの部屋はあまり使われないです。 These two rooms (aven't much. )(ofler 9-2( )内の英語を適切な形に変えなさい。(ただし, 1語になるとは限らな (1) I am (old) than my sister. older good (2). Your room is (big) than mine. bigger (3) This question was (difficult) than the others. more difficult 9.3例にならって,各単語を比較級と最上級にしよう。 (例1) long (longer) (longest) - (2) beautiful - (more beautiful) - (most beautiful) colder 1) cold - ( 2) safe - ( Safer )-( coldest ) )-( Safest )(happiest ) )-( biggest ) )-( best 3) happy (happier 4) big - ( bigger 5) good - (better 6) many/much - ( more 7) difficult - (more difficult 8) exciting (more exciting )-(most) )-(most difficult ) )-(most exciting)

英検準2級のEメールのライティングの問題です。作成した文が正しいかどうか見て欲しいです。

あなたは、外国人の知り合い (Alex) から, Eメールで質問を受け取りました。 この質問にわかりやすく答える返信メールをに英文で書きなさい。 がより理解を深めるために, 下線部の特徴を問う具体的な質問を2つしなさい。 あなたが書く返信メールの中で, Alex のEメール文中の下線部について、あなた ■あなたが書く返信メールの中で [ です。 ■に書く英文の語数の目安は40語~50話 ■ 解答は,解答用紙のB面にあるEメール解答欄に書きなさい。 なお、解答欄の外 に書かれたものは採点されません。 解答が Alex のEメールに対応していないと判断された場合は, 0点と採点される ことがあります。 Alex のEメールの内容をよく読んでから答えてください。 □の下の Best wishes, の後にあなたの名前を書く必要はありません。 Hi! I want to tell you something/ My dad and I went to/a new stadium/last Sunday. It opened two months ago. We watched/ a rugby game/between two university teams/there./ My dad taught me/some of the rules, too. It was my first time,/so it was very exciting. I will continue to watch rugby/ Do you think/more people will watch this sport? Your friend, Alex Hi, Alex! Thank you for your e-mail. 解答は,解答用紙のB面にあるEメール解答欄に書きなさい。 なお,解答欄の外に書かれたものは採点されません。

英訳問題なのですが減点箇所等あれば教えて頂きたいです。よろしくお願いいたします。

2 次の下線部を英訳せよ。 late at hight 先日夜更けに本を読んでいると、どこかで足音らしいものが聞こえたような気がした。 耳を澄ませても家の中はことごとく寝静まっているようだし, 外には風もなかった。 wondered if I'd just imagined it. The other day. when I read the book at late at night I thought that I heared some thing like foot Steps... I listened carefully, but everyone in my house seemd to sleep soundly and there was ho wind out side.

（1）（3）（14）の英文を正しい順番がわからないので並び変えてほしいです。お願いします。

https://olt.toshin.com/OLT/student4 R/Student/OACT Test Performance.aspx?ctestid=1898511201&ctestgroupid=4554&ctestattempt=2&cbigquestionnumber=3&grade=SS&kaitopattern-0 【3】 与えられた語句を意味が通るように並べ替えて最も適当な文を完成させ, 空欄に 当てはまるものを答えなさい。ただし文頭の文字も小文字になっている。 (1) Reading is not "interactive" with a set of rules or options, as games are; 2 reading is actual collaboration with the writer's mind. 正解 あなたの解答 1 8 Deverybody no up (2) [3] animals 4 the which (3) by [5] 4 you mean 7 you 6 [2] (2 is (5) not ⑧ wonder 3 5 3 it to 14 3 3 5 7 7 [4] language after all. 6 1 2 distinguishes 3 from 7 1 1 6 thing us is 28 2 2 [6] 9 3 3 could 3 explain [10] 9 6 6 those words 6 what 11 7

11:03のBut~oneの訳は 「でも、マーケティング部にはゲームを行う意義を理解していない人がいるようです。」ですが、 なぜhaving oneを「ゲームを行う」と訳すことができるのでしょうか？？

Questions 22-25 refer to the following online chat discussion. 9 ERIC DAVIS [11:01 A.M.] Hi all. I'd like to know how preparations for next month's trade show are going. Are we still on schedule? JIM COCHRANE [11:02 A.M.] We planned out the booth, and it's going to look awesome. All our new exercise machines will be on display. DONNA WRIGHT [11:03 A.M.] We haven't decided on a game yet, though. I want something big and colorful so that it catches everyone's attention. But some people on the marketing team don't see the point of having one. ANNETT LEWIS [11:04 A.M.] Well, I get it. But we'll be letting visitors try out the bikes and other machines. That alone will draw plenty of interest to the booth. DONNA WRIGHT [11:05 A.M.] But we should use a game to give out coupons for our products. Plus, games make it easier to start up conversations with potential customers. JIM COCHRANE [11:06 A.M.] And we want people to submit their business cards for a chance to win a big gift at the end of the show. How about a prize wheel? They're eye-catching and amusing. 30

どうしても分からなくて‪😖💧‬ 教えてください

4A 方向 [3] Hello, 英文を読み, 各問に答えなさい。 (教科書 p40~41参照) everyone. My name is Utsunomiya Seika. I'm a train driver for the Sanriku Railway. The railway runs (小) the Sanriku Coast. ②[the/to/by/I/operate/myself/ have / train}, so I am always busy with my duties. However, I like the beautiful scenery from the train windows. I can see and feel the differences of the four seasons. (1) ( ① )に当てはまる前置詞を解答欄に書きなさい。 (2) 下線部②の単語を並び替えて 「私はひとりで電車を操縦しなければならない。」 という英文を作りなさい。

金沢大学2024英語の英作文の添削をしていただけませんか。見づらかったらすみません。

In my opinion, we should be promote equality and recognition of educational background. Now, stady devide continue to spread further. For example. TV problem I have watched showed a poor boy do in South Africa The boy who working housewort not have time enough to go and money enough to do To the school 26 I proved that there are many childrench would like to go to school. I believe that everyone , but they cannot do should understand those situation in which children suffer from having little money. Moreover, put into we. practice such as donating money and volunteer that we help them to study. Through those experiences, educational background may close to equality 11年

写真の黄色い線の部分の文構造を教えていただきたいです🙇 また、 ①ifは「ーかどうか」で訳していいのか ②thisは何を指しているか ③itは何を指しているか も教えていただきたいです。 よろしくお願いします💦

Phil Hello. This is 6 Minute English from BBC Learning English. I'm Phil. Beth And I'm Beth. Phil So, Beth, we're talking about the best education systems in the world today. You went to school here in Britain. What do you think of the British education system? Do you think it could be the best? Beth I think that it's quite good, there's probably a couple of things that I personally would change about it, but I would say it's quite good, but maybe not the best in the world. Phil Well, in this programme, we're going to be talking about the Pisa rankings. Beth The rankings are based on tests carried out by the OECD, that's an international organisation, every three years. The tests attempt to show which countries are the most effective at teaching maths, science and reading. But is that really possible to measure? Well, here is former BBC education correspondent Sean Coughlan talking to BBC World Service programme 'The Global Story'. Sean Coughlan When they were introduced first of all, that was a very contentious idea, because people said 'how can you possibly compare big countries... how can you compare America to Luxembourg or to, you know, or to parts of China, or whatever?' Phil Sean said that the tests were contentious. If something is contentious, then it is something that people might argue about it's controversial. So, at first, Pisa tests were contentious because not everyone believed it was fair to compare very different countries. Beth Phil, I've got a question for you about them. So, in 2022, Singapore was top of the reading rankings. But which of these countries came second? Was it: a) The USA? b) Ireland? or, c) The UK? Phil I think it might be b) Ireland. Beth OK. Well, we will find out if that's correct at the end of the programme. A common pattern in the Pisa rankings is that the most successful countries tend to be smaller. Talking to BBC World Service programme 'The Global Story', Sean Coughlan tells us that many large countries from Western Europe don't score that highly in the rankings. Sean Coughlan They're being outpaced and outperformed by these fast, upcoming countries - you know, Singapore, or Estonia, or Taiwan, or those sort of places which we don't historically think of as being economic rivals, but I suppose the argument for Pisa tests is, if you want to have a knowledge economy, an economy based on skills, this is how you measure it. Phil We heard that many large European countries are being outpaced by smaller nations. If someone outpaces you, they are going faster than you - at a higher pace.