so decide whether the article is worthy of publication. Teedback from these readers often
results in significant revisions or changes to the document。 The author might even decide
not to proceed with firther yritng or publication i or example。 the document has major
flaws or if the research on which it is based is found to be incomplete or faulty. This
review procesS is rigorous and it usually ensures that only high-quality acles are
35 published. TE S rare that errors survive the extensive reviews_that-take_place-before an
-gFGele appears in print in a scholarly publicaton.
Now contrast that process 《9)the process of publishing on the Web. for which here is
no review of any sort no quality control in place. As soon as the first draft of the article