学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

至急!!私立大学看護学部の過去問です。答えがないため、回答を作って欲しいです!!科目は英語です。

問題番号に対応 効とする。 うち受験票お researchers at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna, Austria, have found. Dogs won't give food to a human, even if that person gave them some food first, and that they would help other dogs that had helped them before. Therefore, the team Previous studies have shown that dogs can recognize cooperative and uncooperative humans, "reciprocal altruism"- that is, doing a good thing in return to a human who had given expected to find that their test subjects would put these two things together and show To start, the team trained a group of 37 dogs to press a button which would activate a them food first. *enclosure with the dispenser, while one of (2) two humans was in a separate enclosure with the button. One would press the button to food dispenser. Then, they put each dog in an would not. Each dog was paired with both humans in give food to the dog, and (4) unhelpful one. turn. After that, the researchers switched over the button and the dispenser. They expected that the dogs would press the button to give food to the helpful human but not to the though the dogs did press the button, they did it just as often when either human had the food dispenser, and even when no human was there at all. "In these kinds of studies (5) [perform / to / dogs / which/ trained / are in a particular behavior for an experiment, they will usually do the behavior a few times as they have simply learned the association between the behavior and getting a reward, and it may be enjoyable for them to do the behavior," said Jim McGetrick, a PhD student at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna who led the research. 身を正しく が本冊子 1番 2 次の英文を読んで下の設問に答えなさい。 (3) giving us some food? Are they a combination of reasons. "It is (6) Why wouldn't our best pals want to help us out by secretly all bad boys and girls? McGetrick believes there is possible that the dogs did not understand enough about the task to realize that only one of the humans was providing them with food," he said. It could also be because they didn't fully understand the button and dispenser system, or because they were too focused on the food to notice whether a particular human was pressing the button or not. "Having said all that, even if they did completely understand the task and were fully attentive to the actions of the humans, there is still a good possibility that they wouldn't have given food back in return," he added. "It could be that providing food to a dog as they do not typically do that in everyday life." After all, humans are the ones who human is something very strange for (7) already have food, from a dog's perspective. why would your pet need to worry about (8) making sure you have enough? However, all the humans in the study were people the dogs didn't know. "It is quite 5

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

至急!!私立大学看護学部の過去問です。答えがないため、回答を作って欲しいです!!科目は英語です。

プペンシルで解 people than ever can find an audience time filled with disasters, online, "conspiracy theories seem to be growing crazier by the day. We also tend to believe in such things under increased stress, which is unfortunate because many of these ideas are Some conspiracy theorists pride themselves on being "critical freethinkers," but a new damaging our democracies and ourselves. study showing a connection between lower critical thinking skills and increased conspiracy (2) theory belief suggests this may not be the case. "Conspiracy theories refer to attempts to explain the ultimate cause of an important event (social, political, climatic, etc.) by accusing a hidden group of perceived evil, powerful people or organizations of having secretly planned and carried out these events," say Paris Nanterre University psychologist Anthony Lantian and team in their paper. two studies, the researchers tested the critical thinking skills of 338 a French version of the Ennis-Weir Critical Thinking Essay Test. They then scored the students' tendencies towards conspiracy beliefs and their personal Across undergraduate students (4) the objective analysis and assessment of their own critical thinking skills. Critical thinking. evaluation of a situation requires a collection of cognitive skills. These include the ability to distinguish between relevant versus irrelevant information, think systematically, see other perspectives, recognize and avoid logical *fallacies, look beyond the obvious, be aware of and avoid biases, and change your mind in light of new evidence. "The more people believe in conspiracy theories, the worse they perform on a critical thinking ability test," Lantian said. "This test is characterized by an *open-ended format highlighting several areas of critical thinking ability in the context of argumentation." (6) All this is not to say that those with high critical thinking skills can't also be sucked into believing things that may not necessarily be true. The way (7) [is wired /a/ makes / thinking/ social species / our / as] us very vulnerable to believing those we identify with as part of our own cultural group- no matter how much education we have had that boosts science literacy. Trust plays a massive role in who we believe. We also have a tendency to believe each of us is above average at detecting misinformation, which can't possibly be true. Researchers have also linked this need to feel special to greater belief in conspiracies. Lantian and team point out that while their study suggests critical thinking lowers Deople's chances of believing in untrue conspiracy theories, the findings don't determine if (8) (9) た場合,そ 数学【数学 験番号 【化学 b てお 3 In a more (1) ① 次の英文を読んで、下の設問に答えなさい。 1 - (3) the po no a E

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

所々分からない部分があるので教えて欲しいです よろしくお願いします🙏

Work Complete the sentences below to match the Japanese. If everyone ( ) best-before dates properly, we ( waste. ) all children ( I( 1. 誰もが賞味期限を正しく理解していれば、フードロスをいくらか防ぐことができるのに。 2. すべての子どもたちに食物の安全な取り扱いについて学ぶ機会があればなあ。 3. 水問題についてまるで他人事のように話すべきではない。 4. この最新のオーブンレンジがなければ、より多くのフードロスが生じるでしょう。 We should not talk about water issues ( business. ) ( ) ( ) not ( there would be more food waste. ) a chance to learn about safe food handling. ) prevent some food 3.〈状況〉水問題について議論するハルトの様子を描写します。[be] Haruto is discussing water issues as if he ) they were none of our B Complete the sentences below using the verbs in the brackets. 1. <状況> もし自分がお金持ちならどんなことをするかを述べます。 [be, donate] If I rich, I 2.〈状況〉フードロスを減らすためにできるとよいことを述べます。 [plan, avoid] I wish everyone _unog srij their meals and 4. 〈状況〉もしその村に井戸がなかったら,と考えます。 [be, have If it for the well, villagers ) this latest microwave oven, to fight against food waste. impulse buying. an expert. access to drinking water.

未解決 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

赤で囲った部分 noneとかbothとかが代名詞で使われるイメージがないのですが 具体的にはどういう感じでしょうか

整理して覚える | 039 否定には, すべてを否定する 「全否定」 と, 一部を否定する 「部分否定」という表現がある。 否定するものが2つ [2人] の場合と3つ [3人] 以上の場合ではそれぞれ表現が異なる。 Shishoqata 3つ [3人] not ... any 以上 2つ [2人] not ... either (+単数名詞) = neither (+単数名詞) 「どちら (の〈名詞>) も···ない」 .. 代名詞・形容詞を用いた全否定と部分否定の表現 「すべて [どれも] ・・・ない」 eee not any +名詞 = no +名詞 「すべての 〈名詞〉が[どの〈名詞> も] ではない」 「・・・ない」 none (of A ) 「(AD) 何一つ・・・ない / (A の) だれ 一人・・・ない」 部分否定 not .... both (+複数名詞) 「どちら (の〈名詞>) も・・・というわけ ではない」 not ... all (+1) not every +単数名詞 「すべて(の〈名詞) が…というわけ either, neither, both, any, all は代名詞としても形容詞としても用いられるが, no と every は形容詞としてだけ用いられることに注意。 は「2色のど 否定は <not./ ●全否定3つ [3人]以上の場合 「すべてのペットの持ち込みを許可していない」という3つ以上のすべてを否定する全 否定なので,〈not … any + 名詞〉 と 〈no + 名詞> で文意を完成させる。 min before ●部分否定一3つ [3人] 以上の場合 「誰もが・・・ するわけではない」から、部分否定の③ Not all か④ Not everyone が正解 になる。 述語動詞が wants なので三人称単数の ④ Not everyone が正解。 every ... 「すべての・・・」は全体を構成するひとつひとつに注目する表現で, every のあとに C は単数名詞が続き、さらに 〈every +単数名詞〉 は単数扱いとなる。 everyone, everything も同様に単数扱いとなる。 733 ③ Not all は複数扱いになるので, Not all (people) want to go ... となる。 F ●全否定 2つ [2人] の場合 ではない」という両方を否定する全否定。2つの場合の 名詞) > か〈neither (+名詞)〉なので.④either が正解。

未解決 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

高1英語grammar話法についての説明なのですが、 水色マーカーの文において、なぜknowは現在形なのにwasは過去形になっているのでしょうか。 時制の一致が行われていない気がしています。 解説をお願いします。 (どんな時に合わせないのかが分からないです。)

S 1 時制の一致 1. I know (that) Tom is tired. 2. I knew (that) Tom was tired. 3. I know (that) Tom was tired. 4. I knew (that) Tom had been tired. 11 時制の一致の原則: 主節が表す時制が基準となって, 従属節の動詞の形が決まる。 主節の動 過去形であれば,それに合わせて従属節の動詞も過去形 (2) や過去完了形 (4) になる. 時制の一致と助動詞 BASER 注意 la) 過去形になるもの: will would, shall→should, can→could, may might I am afraid that I may hurt her feelings. →I was afraid that I might hurt her feelings. b)変わらないもの:should, must, need, had better, ought to, used to 2 時制の一致の例外: 次のような場合,原則として 「時制の一致」 は適用されない. 5. We learned that the earth goes around the sun. 6. Jim said that he jogs every morning. 7. He didn't know that World War ⅡI broke out in 1939. a) 真理・ことわざ (5) : 時に関わらず不変の事がらなので、 現在形のまま b) 現在も変わらない事実習慣習性(→6): 現在形のまま C) 歴史上の事実 (7) : 過去に起こったということが明らかなので、 過去形のまま d) 仮定法: 非現実のことを述べるので,主節の時制の変化による影響を受けない. He says that he would become a poet if he were born again. + He said that he would become a poet if he were born again. 11 斜体の 1) Jim 2) Yuji 3) She 4) I we 5) I he 6) I se 7) My 8) I t 2 次の 1) M 2) A 3) M 4) 5) 6) 3 1

未解決 回答数: 1