学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

文構造について教えて頂けないでしょうか?🙇‍♂️🙇‍♂️🙇‍♂️ As odd as these and similar laws appear to be この文章は as these and similar laws appear to be as odd という事で... 続きを読む

6 19 222 | 司法 Justice @ natural1-48 條 slow 2-54 図 seange Laws Explained ⑩ Therc arc ifeW 55Semie around the world 可iewles疾軸誠We For instance/in England d dieyin 休軸6Sesl6分aglimiet. In France/it is forbiddcn to 豆語6 a pig NSPIeO. And/in the 陣S state of 上SSSGISeNtS,@ddimS tomatocs 46 東mehowder)is strictly prohibited. 褒 odd⑱ these/and similar lawy apPPear to 5e/in most cases/there is a logical explanation for the law's 王iStemee. For example, the British Houses of Parliament are in an official palace. If someone dies there, that individual is entitled to an expensive SateWineral ASifor the other laws, Napoleon remains a highly respected 館W@ in France, and INeWiEnglanders are deeply proud of thcir 厩還語訪計 頭Wie人Wof creamy and tomato讃起 clam chowder. (Original、130 words) 日72 atfrstglance 「 日72 one は代名 日73 the HHouses 口/3 nameapig Napoleon … name ABという形で「A をBと名づける」。 日79 state funeral「国発」 口/9 asfor 一「一に関しては」 日/10 fgure 「人物] 上日/.10 New Englanders「(米国北東部の) ニューイングランド地方の人 口/10 variety「種類. タイプ」 日/11 -free「てのない, を使用していない」 | forbid る 唱strictly 厳しく 日prohibit 4 日logical 論理的な 貼existence 存在 口individual 人 個人 48 | おかしな法入事情 ⑩ 世界中には., 一見したところばかばかしく思えるような, 理解しがたい法律 がかなりたくさんある。 例えば, 英国では法律上. 国会議事堂の中で死ぬことが できない。フランスでは, 懇をナポレオンと名づけることが禁じられている。そ して, 米国のマサチューセッツ州では. トマトをクラムチャウダーに加えるのは 厳しく禁じられている。これらの法律や同様の法律は奇妙に思えるが, たいてい 1e | の場合. その法律の存在に対し. 論理的な説明がなされている。例えば, 英国の 山内にある。もし誰かがそ 光ぬとその人は高額な費 なるのだ。その他の法律に関し 尊敬されている人物であ り, ーイングランド地方の人たちは, クリーミーでトマトが入ってい ない, 他とは違う自分たちのクラムチャウダーを大変誇りに思っている。 Related Terms & Expressions pass a law: 法律を可決する enforce a law: 法律を施行する amend a law: 法律を改 repeal a law: 法律を廃止する lawmaker:立: 議員 obey the law: 法律に従う break/violate the law: 法律違反をする against the law: 法律違反で by law: 法律により practice law: 弁護士として働く [英文の内容に合う場合は True, 合わない場合は False を選びなさい。 Although strange laws often appear to be nonsensical, there iS usually some reason behind them. True / False p Answer は p.423 223

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

英語の長文問題です。問3、問4の答え2.4、2であってると思いますが⁇ 問3の根拠→L4〜6、L39〜42 問4の根拠→全体的に見てそう判断しました。 答え違くない⁇と思ったら何番になるかも教えて下さい💦お願いします🤲

1 m bits 8 ,。 eating ha Y。 ing people'8 6 cle to re8 旭 You are studying 科Yan 0 her gaV@ nutrition. Your もGaC open人 od re8i informafion available at fast fo Americans the busy jifestyle of eve that than COO 2 to be higher in fat and ls Many health experts beji Ss more CO Jeads to eating out at restaurant: king and eating od tend 6 tf home. Unfortunately, restaurant fo rts_ believe that | に exDe choi eals. Health Jesterol than home-cooked Tn 1 i can make ition 1 eopJe becomn, re aware of nutr better choices_when_selecting_what to_eat。 Many restaurants provide petker choi 3 ent e goVernrn iti ntent. Th nformation such as calories and nutrition CO 1 the le are uS1ng asked a study team to examine whether peoP nformation they are given. 陣 局/ mn fact, Jaws and regulations have been created 了 tried to peopes eating habits. Some local governments have ( ules abou adver好sennents for unhealthy food. They have also made r に rOaC what foods and drinks are sold at schools. One successful app taken was to force food companies to use labels explaining what 上沼と7 exacy was in the food they sold. The laws required that the calories る contained jm food and drinks have to be shown. This was good for Sixahom、 foogd naz peope buy and cook at home. Many local governments SCarted reguiring that restaurants show the calorie information. Tn 7acz one Survey found that 54% of large restaurant chains showed 太e calorje mformation on their menus. Tjhe sudy ream hoped to find that the information required by d their awW2areCTCSS Of d about nutrition > 交 10 15 20 25

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

英語の長文問題です。問1の答え、問2の答え3、1 で合ってますか⁇ 問1の根拠→L15 問2の根拠→L26〜31 答え違くない?と思ったら何番になるか教えて欲しいです☺︎☺︎お願いします🤲

WgrIICSS Of their a 2 s and about nutrition t ・。 eating habi d ticle もO 1 3 le BYou are studying PeoP an ar er gave YO nutrition、 Your teach an od reS information available at faSt fo な le of Americans hat the busア jfestゲ rts bejieve 8 本 1 an higher in 1a ds to be 6 上 that jy, restauran 時 を at home. Unfortunate」 Tealth experts belie - 了% cholestero】 than home-cooked meals. can make |。 rition + 8 eope beco re_aware of nut Many restaurants DrOVide better choices_when_selecting_what_to_ea The iion content. nformation such as calories and nutrition Many health expei re ofte 1 taurantS nnO Jeads to eating out at re5i 電 ooking and eating gOvernrment i the le are uS1ng asked a study team to examine whether DeOP i 1 are g1Ven. に 0い regulations have been created 氏 隔 10 peoples eating habits. Some local governments have ried to imi advertisements for nnnealthy food. They have also made rules about What foods and drinks are sold at schools. One successful approach taken was to force food companies to use labels explaining what (中洛と7 exacJy was jn the food they sold. The laws required that the calories | is 4ふ SS Con4ai imed in food and drinks have to be shown. This was good for foog tnat peop7e buy and cook at home. Many 1ocal governments Starfed requiring tnat restaurants show the calorie information、Tm fac6 one Survey found that 54% of large restaurant chains showed 妨e cajorje information on ther menus. 20 The study team hoped to fnd that the information required by 25

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

星マークの付いている文(Are there limits beyond which offensive or hateful speech deserves to be suppressed by state power?)のところの訳(2枚目星マーク)が意訳なのか、どうし... 続きを読む

| | Read the PaSsage and answer the questions below. In the summer of 1990, a group of teenagers in the city of St Paul, Minnesota, burned a cross in front of the house of an African-American family. The teenagers were arrested and charged with violating a St. Paul law called the “Bias-motivated Crime Ordinance.” The law made which one knows or has reasonable grounds to know arouses anger, alarm or ツ it iegal to place “on public or private property a symbol .… resentment in others on the basis of race, color, creed, religion or gender.” The teenagers challenged the legal basis of their arrest。 and in 1992、 the US Supreme Court declared the St. Paul aw an unconstitutional violation of freedom of speech. A European court would almost certainly have decided the case differently. Domestic national courts in Europe, as well as the European Court of Human Rights, are far more likely than their American counterparts to | 16 | “extreme speech"- speech that offends personal dignity on the basis of factors such as race ethnicity。 religion and sexual orientation. HateG crime prohibitions are familiar throughout Europe - laws that would not stand a chance of being accepted as constitutional in the United States. The differences between American and European approaches to the law raise pressing questions about the nature and limits of expressive freedom in democratic nations. What role, if any, should the law play in democracies in policing speech? there imits beyond which offensive or hateful speech deserves to be suppressed by state power? Do efforts to punish extreme speech produce a healthier democracy? ② One way to determine the extent to which free speech should be guaranteed would be to take into consideration the cultural and historical 2 ン 。 に

未解決 回答数: 1