学年

教科

質問の種類

生物 高校生

高校生物🧬です!! (1)と(2)両方わかりません!! 答えを見たら置換してあって‥とか書いてあるのですがよく意味がわからなくて💦 どなたかよろしくお願いします🙇‍♀️

リード C+ 46 次の生徒と先生の会話文を読み、以下の問いに答えよ。 生徒: 分子系統解析って難しそうですね。 DNAの塩基配列で系統樹をつくることが できるといわれても、ちょっと・・・。 先生: そんなことはないですよ。 DNAを用いた分子系統解析では、祖先的と考えら れる生物と塩基配列の比較を行い,それに基づいて系統樹をつくります。 試し に簡単な分子系統樹を作成してみましょう。 近縁関係にある5種 (生物 K~O) とそれらの共通祖先種から先に分岐した種(生物X) がいるとして、この6種の DNAの塩基配列を調べたところ, 表のようになったと考えてください。 する 種名 と、この塩基配列に基づいて図のような系統樹をつくることができます。 表 6種の相同な塩基配列 塩基配列の順番 4 5 6 1 生物 X A 生物 K A A A 2G T A T T 3CCC T C C C C G C T G T T T AA TT A A AA A 7 T A 生物 L 生物 M 生物 N 生物 0 A T C G 表に基づく 6種の系統樹 生徒:祖先的な種である生物 X の塩基配列と比較して系統樹をつくるのですね。 先生: そうです。 最初に図の系統樹のiの位置で表の2番目の塩基がGからTに置 換したと考えられます。 これによって, 生物Xと他の5種の群に分かれます。 生徒:iの位置では(a)番目の塩基が(b)に置換されて、生物 (ウ)を含む群と,生物 K と () を含む群に分かれたのですね。 C T 9 C C A C A C G T A T 大学入学共通テスト対策問題 8 GGGGG C X K ( ii i V 先生:はい。さらに,生物Kと生物 (エ)に分かれた群では図の道の位置で7番目 の塩基がTからCに置換され,この2種が分かれます。同様に考えて, ivの 位置では(c)番目の塩基が(d)に置換されて,生物 (イ)と生物ウ を含む群と,生物 (ア)に分かれます。そして,vの位置で(e)番目の塩 基が ( f )に置換されて生物 (イ) と(ウ) の2種が分かれます。 生徒:なるほど。そうやって考えていくと,確かに系統樹をつくることができますね。 先生: 今回は,塩基の置換数が最も少なくなるように系統樹をつくりました。 (1) 空欄 (a)~(f) に最も適した数字または塩基 (A, T, G, C) を,次の①~⑧からそれ ぞれ選べ。 ①2 ②4 ③7 49 ⑤ A 6 T ⑦G 2)空欄(ア)~(エ)に最も適した種名 (L, M, N, 0) を,次の ①~④からそれぞれ選べ。 OL ② M 3 N 40 [21 神奈川大

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

英語の文法についてに質問です。 一と二枚目の緑の蛍光ペンのところの文法が合っているか確認していただきたいです。  三枚目に参考資料を載せてあります。 お願いします🙇‍♂️

CUTTING EDGE 1-05 絶滅危惧種の選定 Have you ever heard of the "quagga"? Perhaps not, but you may have seen a zebra before. (1)The zebra is a horse-like animal with 形M distinctive black and white stripes covering its body. The quagga was a member of the zebra family, brownish in colour with white stripes FOS around the neck and the front part of the body. (2)It is often said that quagga looked like "zebra which had forgotten to put on their pajama trousers." Quaggas lived in Southern Africa, but they died out in the 19th century due to overhunting. We can now only see their wild beauty as 3stuffed specimens. Some researchers, however, have tried to "revive" the quagga. Because of its attractive stripe pattern, the quagga has gathered much attention from those interested in animal conservation. Those who would like to see the animals walk around the savannas again have conducted the Quagga Project for over thirty years in South Africa. Fas 模様のない (3)It turns out that the quagga is genetically close to the plains zebra. In this project, researchers have attempted to selectively breed plains zebras: they chose plains zebras which have fewer stripes and look slightly like quaggas. Baby zebras born to a slightly quagga- like mother and father may look more like the quagga, with a 13 significantly reduced number of stripes. (4)This project has achieved a certain level of success, producing several lovely baby zebras which have striking similarities [to ] the quagga. . However, should we be happy about this? (5)While this new generation of zebras is visually impressive, it only resembles [X]

回答募集中 回答数: 0
英語 高校生

全文訳お願いします!

4 20 科学 420 words Chapter 1 The recipe for making any creature is written in its DNA. So last year, when 1-1 geneticists* published the near-complete DNA sequence of the long-extinct woolly mammoth, there was much speculation about whether we could bring this giant creature back to life. 5 東京理科大学 Creating a living, breathing creature from a genome* sequence that exists only in a computer's memory is not possible right now. But someone someday is sure to try it, predicts Stephan Schuster, a molecular biologist at Pennsylvania State University and a driving force behind the mammoth genome project. So besides the mammoth, what other extinct beasts might we bring back to life? Well, 12 10 it is only going to be possible with creatures for which we can recover a complete genome Without one, there is no chance. And usually when a creature dies, the (1) - DNA in any flesh left untouched is soon destroyed as it is attacked by sunshine and bacteria. sequence. There are, however, some circumstances in which DNA can be preserved. If your 15 specimen froze to death in an icy wasteland such as Siberia, or died in a dark cave or a really dry region, for instance, then the probability of finding some intact stretches of DNA is much higher. Even in ideal conditions, though, no genetic information is likely to survive more than a million years. - so dinosaurs are out and only much younger remains are likely to yield good-quality DNA. "It's really only worth studying specimens that are less than 100,000 years old," says Schuster. The genomes of several extinct species besides the mammoth are already being sequenced, but turning these into living creatures will not be easy. "It's hard to say that something will never ever be possible," says Svante Pääbo of the Max Planck Institute 25 for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany, "but it would require technologies so far removed from what we currently have that I cannot imagine how it would be done." But then (3) 50 years ago, who would have believed we would now be able to read the instructions for making humans, fix inherited diseases, clone mammals and be close to creating artificial life? Assuming that we will develop the necessary technology, we have 30 selected ten extinct creatures that might one day be resurrected. Our choice is based not just on practicality, but also on each animal's "charisma" - just how exciting the prospect of resurrecting these animals is. 1-3

回答募集中 回答数: 0
1/8