学年

教科

質問の種類

地理 高校生

全部あってますか?

120 150-1 800 180 150 30°1 Oh +60' +3 +5 +9 +11 ( +12 -9 +4 +6 40° World Time Zone 資料 ほか〕 <-80F 章 3:30 節 地球儀とl SOカシ +3:30 14:30+5:45 ヨーク 20° 東京 6:30 +9 ¥45:30 とうじたい 世界の等時帯 日付変更線 ひょうじゅんじ -11 同じ標準時を使う地 域のことを等時帯とい い、この図は各地域の 標準時とグリニッジ標 準時との時差を示して いる。 ナイロビー 標準時間帯 |独立時間帯 20 +5:30 (2024年) 赤数字はグリニッジ 標準時との時差 (単位:時間) ※サマータイム制度を 実施している国・地 域もある ○ ケープタウン D 4 +3 +6 +8 +13 S -9:30 +9:30 -20 リオデジャネイロ +845 +12:45 「ブエノスアイレス Ai 日本より時刻が遅い地域 日本より時刻が 早い地域 日本より時刻が遅い地域 +2 +4 +5 +9 +10 +11 +12-12-11-10-9 -8 -6 -5 4-3-2 Let's TRY とう じたいず ひょうじゅんじ STEP1 図4の等時帯図から東京とニューヨークのグリニッジ標準時との時差を読み取ろう。 東京( ) 時間 ニューヨーク ( 時間 STEP 2 STEP1 の結果からわかる、 東京とニューヨークの時差は何時間だろうか。 図中の赤数字に 注目しよう! (14)時間 ちゅうけい STEP3 日本で行われるバスケットボールの試合が、9月2日午後8時10分に始まり、世界に同時中継される。 じこく この時、ニューヨークで観戦する人にとっての試合開始時刻は、何日の何時何分だろうか。 ただし、 せいど じっし ニューヨークでは1時間のサマータイム制度を実施している。(2日 7時 分)

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

英語わかる方教えてください😭

[2] あるクラスでディベートが行われています。 (1)~(3)はディベートの前半戦, (4)(5)は後半戦における発言の (1) 一部です。 ディベートの流れを意識しながら, 進行役の先生のセリフ が流れよく成り立つよう, 下線に当てはまるものを選択肢から選び, 記号で答えなさい。 [思・判・表] (2) (教科書 P.88~89, P.92~95 参照) (3) (1) Teacher Are you ready to start our class debate? (4) Our topic is here on the board: "Digital books are better than paper books." Raise your hand if you have a reason to support for this statement. (2) Student A: With an eReader, we have access to all of the books that we own. We can read many G (5) on the train. We can't carry many books with us every day. Teacher: (3) Student B Paper books don't use electricity. It's important that we use as little electricity as possible to prevent global warming. Teacher: (5点x5) (4) Teacher: Next, we will refute the other side's opinions. Say which opinion you are refuting, give your refutation, then give an example. (5) Student C: They said that digital books are convenient, but I don't think it's a big advantage. We don't always need all of our books with us. Just one book is enough. Teacher: [選択肢] J. Good idea. "Good for the environment." . Great. "Digital books are convenient." . Let's start with the negative side. 1. Let's start with the affirmative side. I. Very good. "Not a significant advantage."

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

問4の⑤の計算はどうすれば合うのですか。 教えてください🙇‍♀️ 3枚目が答えです。

次の英文を読んで,下の設問に答えなさい。 Last year, 4.2 million babies died. That is the most recent number reported by UNICEF of deaths before the age of one, worldwide. We often see lonely and emotionally charged numbers like this in the news or in the materials of activist groups or organizations. They produce a reaction. Who can even imagine 4.2 million dead babies? It is so terrible, and even worse when we know that almost all died from easily preventable diseases. And how can anyone argue that 4.2 million is anything other than a huge number? You might think that nobody would even try to argue (that, but you would be wrong. That is exactly why I mentioned this number. Because it is not huge: it is beautifully small. If we even start to think about how tragic each of these deaths is for the parents who had waited for their newborn to smile, and walk, and play, and instead had to bury their baby, then this number could keep us crying for a long time. But who would be helped by these tears? Instead let's think clearly about human suffering. The number 4.2 million is for 2016. The year before, the number was 4.4 million. The year before that, it was 4.5 million. Back in 1950, it was 14.4 million. That's almost 10 million more dead babies per year, compared with today. Suddenly this terrible number starts to look smaller. In fact (2)the number has never been lower. Of course, I am the first person to wish the number was even lower and falling even faster. But to know how to act, and how to prioritize resources, nothing can be more important than doing the cool-headed math and realizing what works and what doesn't. And this is clear: more and more deaths are being prevented. comparing the numbers. (3). We would never realize that without

解決済み 回答数: 1
1/62