Question

りんご

高一の仮定法です。
簡単ですが、心配なので間違っているところ教えてください🙇🏻‍♀️

1|( )に入れるのに適切な語句を選び, 記号を書きなさい。
)go abroad, Iwould go to France.
(d) on
(1) If I were (
(a) by
(b) tg
(c) having
) do that if I were you.
(a) can't
(b) wouldn't
(c) won't
(d) don't
(3) If Nick(
7longer, he could have met my brother.
stays
) die, pléaseoffer my heart to someone who needs it.
(d) might
) not for the money he contributed, we couldn't have started the project.
was staying
(a) had stayed has stayed
(4) IT(
(a) should
(b) would
(c) will
(b) As if (c))Were it
Was there
(6) If I had known you were already here waiting, I (
(a) could not come
(d) Even if
) SOoner.
(b)/would have come
should not come
had come
(7) If he (
e) is not
)rescued by the fireman, he might not be alive today.
has not been ((c) bad not been
were not
), you could have met my friends.
) If you have come earlier
You had come earlier
(a) If you come earlier
(c) Had you come earlier
your help, I could not have completed the work.
(d) Without
(a) If
(b) Had
(c) But

Answer 1

こーへー

4番はshouldですね。If shouldの典型的なパターンです。後ろの主節を見ればわかるようにこの形は直接法ですので正確には仮定法ではありません。
簡単に説明します。仮定法は「現実には起こらなかった、起こっていない、起こり得ないこと」について話したい時に使います。だから主節に助動詞の過去形を用いて「現在=事実」との断絶感(現実とは違うこと)を表します。
一方、if節を用いた直接法は「現実に起こった、起こっている、起こり得ること」を表します。if節・主節ともに普通に現在形です。ですが、病気で死んだ時など普通に起こり得るけど可能性は低いような話をしたい時もあります。そのような時はif節にshouldを用いるわけですね。この場合は主節にはwillや今回のように命令形が使われます。一応wouldも使えますがあまり使われません。

りんご

ご丁寧に、ありがとうございます！