かっこに同じ単語が入るらしいのですが、全く分かりません😭何が入るか教えてください🙏

1. The reviewer criticized the study for lacking a ( foundation, making its conclusions difficult to justify. 2, The mathematician presented a highly ( ) methodological ) proof that resolved a long-standing conjecture.

下の英文について質問です。 比較級の文は、「本来2つ目の接続詞のas（than）の後には一文があり、前文との兼ね合いで省略されなかったものだけが残されている（=つまり、元々は２つの文だった）」という認識でいたのですが、 今回のtwice as〜asのところでは、その構造がよ... 続きを読む

34 解答・解説 p.78 Less than half of the expected number returned to the river, despite the fact that twice as many young salmon as usual were released the previous year.

人の名前は単数系で、物は複数形で書くって覚えても大丈夫ですか？後、なぜ過去形ではないのでしょうか？前者が答えで、後者が自分が解いた時に書いたやつです。範囲の教科書も2枚目に貼っときます

4 ( d 内の動詞を適切な形に直して空欄を埋めなさい。 時制は現在で考えなさい。 1) (go) Not only Bill but also his classmates 2) (be) Neither Mom nor Dad is to church. in the house. 3) (be) Both the radio and the CD player are/were broken. 15/04 4) (be) Either his brother or my sister is are going to help you. (S

学校選択問題についてなんですけど、英語はどのように対策したのか教えてください。最後の長文問題ができません。

比較についての問題を解いてみました！ 明日授業があるので間違っていたら教えて欲しいです🙏 よろしくお願いします！

だ) る) 1 [ ]内の語を必要があれば適切な形にして、英文を完成させなさい。 (1) Japan is I (2) I drank water as (3) Taro runs (4) That camera is る) (5) Math is ...> で す。 247 smaller much. fastest the most expensive. more difficult 2 日本語の意味に合うように,( )内に適切な語を入れなさい。 A than Australia. [ small] as Cathy. [much] in my class. [fast] of the three. [ expensive ] than English for me. [difficult ] (1) これは,私の人生で私のおかしたずば抜けて一番ひどい過ちだ。 This is (by) ( far) the worst mistake I've ever the worst (2) 私のいとこのケイは私より16か月年少だ。 made i My cousin Kei is 16 (months) (older) (than) me. (3) 新しいモデルは,以前のものより3倍重い。 The new model is three(fimes)(as)(heavy in my life. ) as the former one.

比較についての問題を解いてみました！ 明日授業があるので間違っていたら教えて欲しいです🙏 よろしくお願いします！

1 [ ]内の語を必要があれば適切な形にして,英文を完成させなさい。 (3) Taro runs (1) Japan is Ti smaller (2) I drank water as る) much. fastest (4) That camera is the most expensive る) more difficult. で す。 247 (5) Math is 2 日本語の意味に合うように,( 内に適切な語を入れなさい。 A than Australia. [small] as Cathy. [much] in my class. [ fast] of the three. [ expensive] than English for me. [difficult ] (1) これは,私の人生で私のおかしたずば抜けて一番ひどい過ちだ。 This is (by) (far ) the worst mistake I've ever made in my life. (2) 私のいとこのケイは私より16か月年少だ。 My cousin Kei is 16 (months) (older) (than) me. (3) 新しいモデルは、以前のものより3倍重い。 The new model is three(flmes) (as › cheavy ) as the former one. 3 下線部の表現に注意して、次の英文を日本語にしなさい。 (1) The sooner you finish, the earlier you can go home. 早く終えれば終えるほど、早く家に帰れる。 (2) Call your parents as soon as possible. できるだけ早く両親に電話しなさい。 (3) The older you get, the wiser you become, 19 is > 歳を取れば取るほど、賢くなる。 ]内の語を並べかえなさい。 4 日本語の意味に合うように,[ (1)燃料費は昨年の平均より19パーセント高い。 The cost of fuel is [ higher / percent / than / nineteen] the average last year. ABC The cost of fuel is nineteen percent higher tharine average last year. (2) 私はできるだけ静かにドアを閉めた。 | closed the door [as/as/ could / quietly/1]. I closed the door as quietly as I could. (3) 私のイヌはあなたのイヌほど人なつこくない。 My dog is [yours/friendly/not/as/as ]. My dog is not as friendly as yours (4) たくさんの情報を得ることができるほど、その問題をよりいっそうきちんと理解できる。 The more information you get, [ you / more / understand / clearly / the / can ] the subject. The more information you get, the more clearly you. the subject. can understand 23

下線部（４）に関して、この質問に込められているDaveの気持ちを基本後で説明しなさい に対して 申し訳なさだと思ったんですけどこれってどんな意味があるんですか

4 20 Chapter 1 英文を読んで、 設問に答えなさい。 物語 271 words Time: 35 minutes Ted had a son, but his son had no mother. Ted and his seven-year-old A-1 son, Dave, lived alone. Ted was not very rich, so he had to work hard every day. One evening, Ted was driving home after his hard work. He was very 5 tired, but he loved his son. "(A) Dave must be feeling lonely now. I have to go home as soon as possible." He hurried home, but he came back home at nine o'clock. Dave was still awake when he saw his father, and said, "Dad, how much do you make an 時きゅうないとどうなの? 10 hour?" 息子 15 Ted got angry at his son. He was not making enough money for their living. And he was too tired to stay calm "Why do you ask (1)such a silly question when I come home from hard work? I make twenty dollars an hour. Is that good enough for you?" "I'm sorry, Dad. But... (B) will you give me ten dollars?" "Another silly question! Just go to bed and sleep! Right now!" A-2 After Dave went to his room, Ted sat down on his sofa and had a drink. (2)He came to himself again, and thought he was wrong to his son. He went 自分自身のうに into Dave's room. fr 理性をとりどす. "I'm sorry, my son. I didn't want to get angry with you. Here's your ten dollars." A-3 "Thank you, Dad!" 25 Dave got up and opened his treasure box. He had another ten dollars in it. When Ted saw this, (3)he got angry again. "Why do you want another ten dollars? You already have ten dollars!" But Dave asked, watching his Dad's eyes, "(4)Dad, can I buy your one hour with these twenty dollars?" come to oneself. begin acting and thinking like one's normal self A-4 「速読」 1. x >

(3)お願いします。最小値がないということはこの式が単調増加であるということだと思うのですけど、これをどう使うのかわからないです

第2問 (必答問題)(配点15) 太郎さんと花子さんは、次の問題について話している。 (2) 問題 αを定数とする。リーザーα・3の最小値を求めよ。 花子 - イ ウ I αのとき、最小値は になると思うよ。 オ 4 太郎:ちょっと待って!alのときも4-1のときもだから (1) 太郎のグラフをかいたらどうなるのかな。 花子コンピュータソフトを使ってのときと1のときのグラフを かくと次のようになるね。 エ a=1のときも4-1のときも最小値は一 になるけれど、グ オ ラフを見ると1のときは最小値が存在しないはずだよね。 V/A k- イ ウ -α とする。 a=1のときの最小値を H とするのが誤りで オ ある理由として正しいものは である。 a=1のとき I 4-1のとき 太郎=1のときはgの最小値が存在するけれど,-1のときは最小値が 存在しないみたいだね。 最小値を求めるにはどうすればよいかな。 カ については、最も適当なものを、次の①~③のうちから一つ選べ。 ⑩t>0であり, 4-1 のときは となることはないから。 ① 1>0であり、a=1のときはt-kとなることはないから。 ② t<0であり、a=1のときは1=kとなることはないから。 1 <0であり, a=-1のときはt=kとなることはないから。 花子 : 3 とおきμをtの式で表してみよう。 ワンド t" とおくとは =ドー アat となる。 2 イ I a a² オム (数学 II, 数学 B. 数学C第2問は次ページに続く』 (3)yの最小値が存在しないとき,αのとり得る値の範囲は キ である。 キ の解答群 a>0 ① a≥O ③ a≤1 a <0 ② a<1 a≤0 (数学Ⅱ. 数学 B. 数学C第2間は次ページに続く。) -5-

問4の⑤の計算はどうすれば合うのですか。 教えてください🙇‍♀️ 3枚目が答えです。

次の英文を読んで,下の設問に答えなさい。 Last year, 4.2 million babies died. That is the most recent number reported by UNICEF of deaths before the age of one, worldwide. We often see lonely and emotionally charged numbers like this in the news or in the materials of activist groups or organizations. They produce a reaction. Who can even imagine 4.2 million dead babies? It is so terrible, and even worse when we know that almost all died from easily preventable diseases. And how can anyone argue that 4.2 million is anything other than a huge number? You might think that nobody would even try to argue (that, but you would be wrong. That is exactly why I mentioned this number. Because it is not huge: it is beautifully small. If we even start to think about how tragic each of these deaths is for the parents who had waited for their newborn to smile, and walk, and play, and instead had to bury their baby, then this number could keep us crying for a long time. But who would be helped by these tears? Instead let's think clearly about human suffering. The number 4.2 million is for 2016. The year before, the number was 4.4 million. The year before that, it was 4.5 million. Back in 1950, it was 14.4 million. That's almost 10 million more dead babies per year, compared with today. Suddenly this terrible number starts to look smaller. In fact (2)the number has never been lower. Of course, I am the first person to wish the number was even lower and falling even faster. But to know how to act, and how to prioritize resources, nothing can be more important than doing the cool-headed math and realizing what works and what doesn't. And this is clear: more and more deaths are being prevented. comparing the numbers. (3). We would never realize that without

間違っている下線部がどれなのかわかる方教えていただきたいです。

(1) Although numerous attempts to solve the complex equation, the (2) mathematician struggled to find a viable solution. (3) (4)