学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

2行目赤線部 なぜ形容詞のカタマリが後ろに回ったんですか? そんなの気づかないし、むずくないですか? 倒置でもないし、どうしたら気付きますかね

nced 29 Cook as a baby nces [in es clear C learn], pol)]>" ませ ウォッ [ 脳科 長に 新し の幼 示し よい 料不 ense ead 明 究 変わりませんよね (Rule 73 p.180)。 また,, which ~はa child's readiness to learn を先行詞とする関係代名詞の非制限用法です。 研究 show~の形 31 The findings (further) show the importance [of government food assistance V 0 programs, says Cook. 32 “These programs are very effective (in ensuring both the V S S V C food security and the health of school children and enabling them to go to school [ready to learn])," he says. 38 Making sure ({that kids get enough to eat) is good S V 33 S V C (for society) (in the long run), he says, (because hunger [experienced early in S life] can (really) set the direction [for a child's "ability to compete (in the job market) and to earn enough money to survive (as a member of society)]])." 訳 31 この研究結果はさらに,政府による食料支援政策の重要性を示していると TRY クは言う。 32 「そういった政策は,食料安全保証と学童の健康の両方を確保し、ま た彼らが,学習レディネスを備えた状態で学校に通えるようにするのにとても効 chlod 果的です」と彼は述べる。 33 子どもたちが十分な食料を得られるようにすること は,長い目で見れば社会にとってよいことであると彼は言うが,それは,人生の 初期段階で飢えを経験すると実際に,子どもの「労働市場で競争し、社会の一員 として生き残るのに十分なお金を稼ぐ能力」 の方向性が定まってしまう可能性が あるからである。 bypalom 31 food assistance 食料支援/program 名政策計画/32 ensure 確保する/ make sure {that} ~ 確実に~する, 〜を確実にする / in the long run 長期的 に見れば/set 設定する 決める / direction 名 方向性 / compete 競争す る / survive 生き残る, どうにかやっていく ebo 33 Lesson 11 ・構文 322つ目のand は2つの-ing (ensuring ~/enabling ~) を結んでいます。 ま ready to learn は, 直前のthem (= school children) を修飾する形容詞のカタ マリが後ろに回った形です。 33 Making sure 〜のカタマリを分詞構文と誤読して しまっても、後ろに is (V) が続いているため, 動名詞の主語だったと判断する ことができます。 また, and は2つの to不定詞 (to compete ~ / to earn ~ )を結 bloom & stow abil んでいます。 Tewal svad od ablo-diam- 12 bool # in food security and the health of school children and enabling them to go to school ready to learn," he says. Making sure kids get enough to eat is good for society in 20 the long run, he says, because hunger experienced early in life can really set the direction for a child's "bility to compete in the ich 197

解決済み 回答数: 2
英語 高校生

赤い下線のところがどういう構造になっているか分からないです、教えてくださいm(_ _)m

moving from " (1) 点) There are historians and others who would like to make a neat division between "historical facts" and "values." The trouble is that values even enter into deciding what count as facts-there is a big leap involved in 'raw data" to a judgement of fact. More important, one finds that the more complex and multi-levelled the history is, and the more important the issues it raises for today, the less it is possible to sustain a fact-value division. But this by no means implies that there has simply to be a conflict of prejudices and biases, as the data are manipulated to suit one worldview or another. What it does mean is that the self of the historian is an important factor. The historian is shaped by experiences, contexts, norms, values, and beliefs. When dealing with history, especially the sort of history that is of most significance in philosophy, that shaping is bound to be relevant. As far as possible it needs to be articulated and open to discussion. The best historians are well aware of this. They are alert to many dimensions of bias and to the endless (and therefore endlessly discussable) significance of their own horizons and presuppositions. A great deal can of course be learned from those who do not share our presuppositions. Our capacity to make wise, well-supported judgements in matters of historical fact and significance can only be formed over years of discussion with others, many of whom have very different horizons from our own. It is possible to I have a 12-year-old chess champion or mathematical or musical genius, but it is unimaginable that the world's greatest expert on Socrates could be that age. The difficulty is not just one of the time to assimilate information; it is (2)

解決済み 回答数: 1