学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

添削お願いしますm(_ _)m

:45 演習 45 (問題→本冊: p.91) Some people are able to consider unemotionally all the good points and bad points of a decision. This method is certainly effective, although most of us generate emotions that interfere with logic. Let me repeat that you cannot make “no” decision, only a decision either to risk a choice or a decision not to risk a choice. [全文訳】 決心したことの長所と短所をすべて感情に動かされずに検討することのでき る人がいる。確かにこの方法は効果的である,とは言うものの私たちの中の大部分 の者は論理を阻害する感情を来たす。 繰り返して言わせてもらうと決心 「しない」 ということはできないし、むしろいちかばちか選択する決意をするか, 敢えて選択 しないという決意をするしかないのだ。 【解説】第1文の unemotionally は副詞で, consider (Vt) と2つの points という目 的語の間に割り込んでいる。 第2文の副詞 certainly は文中に入り込んでいるが,文修飾の役割を果たしている (→ 100 課)。 although 以下は文の流れから,また直前にカンマがあるので追加的に使 われていると考え、主節の後に訳すのがよい。 interfere の前のthatは関係代名詞主 格である。 第3文は Let の後の repeat が V で, その目的語である that 節内のカンマの前後を 比較して以下のようにとらえる。 you cannot make "no" decision, カンマ = but (you can) only (make) a decision either (to risk a choice) or (a decision) not (to risk a choice), カンマの後に not を置かないこと。 カンマが but の役割を果たしていて(→8課) decision を to risk, not to risk が形容詞的に修飾している(→57課)。

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

問4の⑤の計算はどうすれば合うのですか。 教えてください🙇‍♀️ 3枚目が答えです。

次の英文を読んで,下の設問に答えなさい。 Last year, 4.2 million babies died. That is the most recent number reported by UNICEF of deaths before the age of one, worldwide. We often see lonely and emotionally charged numbers like this in the news or in the materials of activist groups or organizations. They produce a reaction. Who can even imagine 4.2 million dead babies? It is so terrible, and even worse when we know that almost all died from easily preventable diseases. And how can anyone argue that 4.2 million is anything other than a huge number? You might think that nobody would even try to argue (that, but you would be wrong. That is exactly why I mentioned this number. Because it is not huge: it is beautifully small. If we even start to think about how tragic each of these deaths is for the parents who had waited for their newborn to smile, and walk, and play, and instead had to bury their baby, then this number could keep us crying for a long time. But who would be helped by these tears? Instead let's think clearly about human suffering. The number 4.2 million is for 2016. The year before, the number was 4.4 million. The year before that, it was 4.5 million. Back in 1950, it was 14.4 million. That's almost 10 million more dead babies per year, compared with today. Suddenly this terrible number starts to look smaller. In fact (2)the number has never been lower. Of course, I am the first person to wish the number was even lower and falling even faster. But to know how to act, and how to prioritize resources, nothing can be more important than doing the cool-headed math and realizing what works and what doesn't. And this is clear: more and more deaths are being prevented. comparing the numbers. (3). We would never realize that without

解決済み 回答数: 1
1/60