Question

流星

こちらの59番と64番の問題なんですがいずれもwould　have doneが使われない理由がわかりません。仮定法や時制の一致による未来完了とも考えられる気がします

ロロロ Dshould not hav
③ may have seen
(4) cannot have seen
53
)there yesterday, but we didn't see him.
理
63 Tom (
ロロ 0 should be
③ may not have been
2 might have been
いす
O1)
2)
4 must be
Point024
P
64 Why did you try tofix the computer by yourself? You (
ロロ help before you gave up.
6
O should ask
③ would ask
② should have asked
④ would have asked
65 I (
yet.
O could have received
③ ought to have received
) an e-mail from Jane in the morning but it hasn'ton
2 must have received
may haye received
CC
e

③ had no better
Point 022
) be.
58 I suppose this is where an old church (
ロロ
① was used to ② used to
③ would often
4 was kept (学習
59 She (
) often come to see us when she was a child.
ロロロ
O has ② should ③ would ④ would have
Point023
60 The street is all wet; it (
) during the night.
① must have rained
③ cannot have rained
② should rain
4)
may rain
(立命

Answer 1

✨ ベストアンサー ✨

Dεακγ

まず、59はwouldを使った過去の回想みたいな感じですね。
We would often talk when young.
(私たちは若い頃よく話していたな)
この場合はwouldだけでいいです。
これはこう覚えるしか無いですね。

64は、shouldとwouldの違いが分かれば瞬殺です。
wouldは「するだろう」
shouldは「すべきだ」
64を日本語にすると、
「なんで、君は自力でパソコンを直そうとしたの？
　君は諦める前に助けてを求め( )」みたいになります。
ここに、would have askedが入ると、
「助けを求めただろう」明らかにおかしいですよね
should have askedなら、
「助けを求めるべきだった」完全にあうので、
should have asked か適切ですね。

流星

ありがとうございます！