学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

赤線部分についてです。私は「any species」を「いかなる種」と訳したのですが、日本語訳や解説を見るに、"any species"は"a species"という意味を表してるそうです。今までanyにひとつの物を限定するイメージを持っておらず、調べてもあまり理解できなか... 続きを読む

2 Unit 20-Cognitive Linguistics- | 519 words / 筑波大 1 識別 One of the most important things that language does for us is help us make distinctions. implicitly, automatically all other When we call something edible, we distinguish it from - R オ 2 5 things that are inedible. When we call something a fruit, we necessarily distinguish it from vegetables, meat, dairy, and so on. 初期の人 組織した。彼らの精神と 基本的な私たちがまた 有効的に ② (1) Early humans organized their minds and thoughts around basic distinctions/that we still make and find useful. One of the earliest distinctions made was between now/and not-now; / these things are happening in the moment these other things happened in the past and are now in my memory. No other species makes this self-conscious distinction among past, present, and future. Of course many species respond to time by building nests, flying south, hibernating", 10 mating but these are preprogrammed, instinctive behaviors and these actions are not the 物体の永抂 result of conscious decision, meditation, or planning. 13 Simultaneous with an understanding of now versus before is one of (2) object permanence: Something may not be in my immediate view, but that does not mean it has ceased to exist. Our 存在をつかむではない? 何かはすぐには見えないかも brains represent objects that are here-and-now as the information comes in from our sensory 2 15 receptors For example, we see a deer and we know through our eyes that the deer is standing n& right before us! When the deer is gone we can remember its image and represent it in our mind's eve, or even represent it externally by drawing or painting or sculpting it. Jon 上の 4 This human capacity to distinguish the here-and-now from the here-and-not-now.showed up 初の記校 なだがここにあって、何がここにあったか at least 50,000 years ago in cave paintings. (3) These constitute the first evidence of any species on 芝援 識別 ひきる 120 earth being able to explicitly represent the distinction between what is here and what was here. In as other words those early cave-dwelling Picassos, through the very act of painting, were making a distinction about time and place and objects, an advanced cognitive operation we now call mental representation* And what they were demonstrating was an articulated sense of time: There was a deer out there (not here on the cave wall of course). He is not there now, but he was there before. 25 Now and before are different; here (the cave wall) is merely representing there (the meadow in front of the cave). This prehistoric step in the organization of our minds mattered a great deal. 5 In making such distinctions, (4) we are implicitly forming categories, something that is often す overlooked The formation of categories in humans is guided by a cognitive principle of wanting 多くの何報をできる! 325 h to encode as much information as possible with the least possible effort. Categorization systems optimize* the ease of conception and the importance of being able to communicate about those hibernate 冬眠する sensory receptor: 感覚受容器 (体の周囲の環境情報を感知する受容器の総称。 目、鼻、耳など) cognitive : 認識の mental representation 的表象(例えば人が「イヌ」を考えるとき、それは頭の中で文字でも映像でも 音でもない 何らかの形で思い描かれるが,この「頭の中の記号」のことを心的表象という) encode:・・・を記号化する optimize ... を最大限にする permeate : ・・・ に広がる 英 6 音

解決済み 回答数: 2
英語 高校生

Be動詞って自動詞で、whatの後ろは不完全でないといけないのにBe動詞で終わってたら完全になっちゃわないですか?

( 向陽 (株) 知らせ FUNIT 2 関係詞(2) what・複合関係詞 攻略のコツ 不完全」 という2つの視点で解決します。 難しいと思われている whoever なども 関係代名詞 what は 「“もの”“こと”と訳す」 では通用しません。 「名詞節を作る 今までと視点を変えることで解決していきますよ。 1 関係代名詞 whatの考え方 何が出る? 関係代名詞 whatの2つの性質は、 入試頻出です。 一方、誰もが覚えている what の「もの・こと」という意味は、ほとんど問われないのが現実です。 どう考える? 関係代名詞 what のポイント ① 「名詞節」 を作る ※ほかの関係代名詞・関係副詞は「形容詞節」 ② 後ろは 「不完全」 ※ほかの関係代名詞と同じ 普通の関係代名詞 (who which など)、 関係副詞は「形容詞節」 でしたが、 what は 「名詞節」を作る特殊な関係代名詞なんです (「名詞節を作る」ので、その カタマリはS・O・Cになります)。 また、 「後ろは不完全」 という点はほかの関係 代名詞と同じです。 英語の核心 what は 「名詞節」を作り、 後ろは 「不完全」になる! ☆先行詞がない +αは? whatを使った慣用表現 (1)原則通り 「名詞節」 を作るもの ① what I am 型 LHR SSK 山崎知 関係 (2) whatlam 「現在の私」 直訳「今現在、私があるところのもの」 □ what was what I used to be 「過去の私」 □ what she looks 「彼女の外見」 ②A is to B what Cis to D「AとBの関係はCとDの関係と同じだ」 (2) 例外的に「副詞節」と考えるもの ① what we call what is called 「いわゆる」 ② what is 比較級 what is more 「さらに」 / what is better 「さらによいことに what is worse 「さらに悪いことに」 -what makes matters worse ② 複合関係詞の考え方 どう考える? 関係詞に ever がついたものを「複合関係詞」といいます(関係代名詞+ever= 「複合関係代名詞」、関係副詞+ever = 「複合関係副詞」の2つがあります)。 複合関係詞(複合関係代名詞と複合関係副詞) 複合関係代名詞 : whoever / whomever/whichever / whatever 複合関係副詞 : whenever / wherever / however

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

赤い下線のところがどういう構造になっているか分からないです、教えてくださいm(_ _)m

moving from " (1) 点) There are historians and others who would like to make a neat division between "historical facts" and "values." The trouble is that values even enter into deciding what count as facts-there is a big leap involved in 'raw data" to a judgement of fact. More important, one finds that the more complex and multi-levelled the history is, and the more important the issues it raises for today, the less it is possible to sustain a fact-value division. But this by no means implies that there has simply to be a conflict of prejudices and biases, as the data are manipulated to suit one worldview or another. What it does mean is that the self of the historian is an important factor. The historian is shaped by experiences, contexts, norms, values, and beliefs. When dealing with history, especially the sort of history that is of most significance in philosophy, that shaping is bound to be relevant. As far as possible it needs to be articulated and open to discussion. The best historians are well aware of this. They are alert to many dimensions of bias and to the endless (and therefore endlessly discussable) significance of their own horizons and presuppositions. A great deal can of course be learned from those who do not share our presuppositions. Our capacity to make wise, well-supported judgements in matters of historical fact and significance can only be formed over years of discussion with others, many of whom have very different horizons from our own. It is possible to I have a 12-year-old chess champion or mathematical or musical genius, but it is unimaginable that the world's greatest expert on Socrates could be that age. The difficulty is not just one of the time to assimilate information; it is (2)

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

答え合ってますでしょうか🥹🥹 特に39番と42番が勘で合ってたとしてもなんでそうなるか分からないです、、 お願いします😭😭✨✨

② 次の英文の下線部には誤っている箇所が1箇所ある。その番号を選び, 38. every + There is no doubt that oil is of great benefit to every of the nations. ④ every nation どのく名命館大 39. The both children had been invited to the party, but unfortunately neither was able rol to Jeolf () ③ to go. he has. 40. Taro visits two or three temples every months, depending on how 41. Making money is not an end by itself. in itself 46141 w much f free time + month <京都外国語大〉 <宮崎大 > 42. The man who ② was driving the other car doesn't think the accident was his fault, and I 1 (*) 立 am sure it is not our, either. Yours dailyn 3 次の日本文の意味になるように, ( )内の語または語句を並べかえて適切な英文を作りなさい。 43. 他人のあら探しをする人は、自分の欠点が見えなくなりがちである。 200 m2 BS (faults/fault/with/own/ their / blind/to/those/other/who/to/tend/people/find/ be). 〈高知大〉 Data Reople tend to be blind to their own faults, who those find fault □ 44. 彼女が我々を裏切ることなど,まずありそうもないと私は思う。 adiom I ( would ever /think/that/ it / betray/she/highly unlikely) us. would ever think that she would betray □ 45. お互いに手紙を書いたおかげで、私たちは友達になりました。 14. (each/to/us/other friends become / helped / writing). is wille Writing each other helped 46. 彼はその問題と何の関わりがあるのか。 with other 〈日本大〉 〈龍谷大〉 us to become friends What (do / does / have / he /to/ with the matter? does he have to do with □ 47. ジェーンは自分で大学の授業料を払う余裕がありません。 "Sworomot Jane (pay /to/cannot / tuition / by / afford / university) herself. 〈拓殖大 〉 <聖路加看護大〉 cannot afford to pay university fuition by le shem

解決済み 回答数: 1
1/95