学年

教科

質問の種類

英語 高校生

仮定法の英作文についてです! 「もしプラスチックがなかったら」というテーマで英作文を書いたのですが、間違ってる文やおかしな部分があったら教えて欲しいです😢 暗唱テストなので、なるべく短めにしています🙇🏻‍♀️՞ よろしくお願いします🙏🏻

If there were no plastic, the environment would be cleaner. ( because waste would be reduced. 2 Also, animals would be safer because they would not eat plastic. 3 However, if there were no plastic, products would become heavier. , because they would be made of glass or metal. 4 Also, product prices would become higher because glass and metal cost more to produce. 5 If there were no plastic, the environment would improvert but life would be inconvenient. a 1 もしプラスチックがなかったら、環境ばよりきれいになるでしょう、なぜならごみが減るからです。 2.また、動物たちはプラスチックを食べなくなるので、より安全にするでしょう。 3 しかし、もしプラスチックがなかったら、製品は重くなるでしょう、なぜならガラスや金属で作られることになるから 4 また、ガラスや金属は作るのにお金がかかるので、製品の値段は高くなるでしょう。 5. もしプラスチックがなかったら、環境はよくなりますが、生活は不便になるでしょう。 で '

未解決 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

英検2級の英作文問題です。 内容の添削をお願いします。 字が汚くて読みにくくてすいません🙇🏻‍♀️

ライティ. ださい。 この問題は解答用紙B面の5 の解答欄に解答を記人 5 ライティング (英作文) •POINTS は理由を書く際の参考となる観点を示したものです。 ただし, これら ◆以下の TOPICについて,あなたの意見とその理由を2つ書きなさい。 以外の観点から理由を書いてもかまいません。 ●語数の目安は80語~100語です。 ●解答は,解答用紙のB面にある英作文解答欄に書きなさい。なお, 解答欄の外 に書かれたものは採点されません。文 ●解答が TOPIC に示された問いの答えになっていない場合や, TOPIC からずれ していると判断された場合は, 0点と採点されることがあります。 TOPIC の内容 TOPIC をよく読んでから答えてください。 TO STIL goiq how s-hode ni ainam 01 52005 In Japan, some people say that famous tourist sites, such as castles and temples, should limit the number of visitors. Do you agree with this opinion? ad asineqmos oalA 300m gaphow we algosy to bailedw bag to one POINTS nsbute tanto wonda 39g of atugbuna wolls aqidamsin ● Cleanliness hub Tod sibo Hom Local economiesselves ●Reputation of of good almsbul li bund to or no gniob 8 yerli doj od brabo of alda od son yam yadı qidala aqidamstai ni neq solat od alusbute.oalAbas agiriamaini si soled asibula isdi ni llow ob a slashilib a bait yam arind

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

英検2級のライティング添削お願いします。アドバイス等もお願いします

以下の英文を読んで その内容を45~55語の英語で要約し, 解答欄に記入しなさい。 解答は、解答用紙のB面にある英文要約解答欄に書きなさい。 なお、解答欄の外 に書かれたものは採点されません。 解答が英文の要約になっていないと判断された場合は, 0点と採点されることが あります。英文をよく読んでから答えてください。 Nowadays, consumers have become increasingly concerned about various environmental issues across different industries. Within these trends, reducing wrapping materials has attracted particular attention. Recently, more businesses have begun adopting this policy. What are the benefits of this? Reducing wrapping materials significantly lowers the overall environmental impact. Fewer wrapping materials mean less waste is created and fewer natural resources are consumed. Additionally, decreasing wrapping materials can ease the financial burden on producers. It leads to lower production costs and allows companies to offer their products at more reasonable prices to consumers. However, reducing wrapping materials does have some drawbacks. Products could suffer quality issues because wrapping materials help protect them from damage during transportation. Moreover, reducing the amount of wrapping paper may result in consumers having to pay for wrapping when buying gifts and other items. Thus, some people find this annoying and inconvenient.

解決済み 回答数: 1
英語 高校生

問4の⑤の計算はどうすれば合うのですか。 教えてください🙇‍♀️ 3枚目が答えです。

次の英文を読んで,下の設問に答えなさい。 Last year, 4.2 million babies died. That is the most recent number reported by UNICEF of deaths before the age of one, worldwide. We often see lonely and emotionally charged numbers like this in the news or in the materials of activist groups or organizations. They produce a reaction. Who can even imagine 4.2 million dead babies? It is so terrible, and even worse when we know that almost all died from easily preventable diseases. And how can anyone argue that 4.2 million is anything other than a huge number? You might think that nobody would even try to argue (that, but you would be wrong. That is exactly why I mentioned this number. Because it is not huge: it is beautifully small. If we even start to think about how tragic each of these deaths is for the parents who had waited for their newborn to smile, and walk, and play, and instead had to bury their baby, then this number could keep us crying for a long time. But who would be helped by these tears? Instead let's think clearly about human suffering. The number 4.2 million is for 2016. The year before, the number was 4.4 million. The year before that, it was 4.5 million. Back in 1950, it was 14.4 million. That's almost 10 million more dead babies per year, compared with today. Suddenly this terrible number starts to look smaller. In fact (2)the number has never been lower. Of course, I am the first person to wish the number was even lower and falling even faster. But to know how to act, and how to prioritize resources, nothing can be more important than doing the cool-headed math and realizing what works and what doesn't. And this is clear: more and more deaths are being prevented. comparing the numbers. (3). We would never realize that without

解決済み 回答数: 1
1/158